Primal-Dual iLQR
2403.00748
0
0
🌀
Abstract
We introduce a new algorithm for solving unconstrained discrete-time optimal control problems. Our method follows a direct multiple shooting approach, and consists of applying the SQP method together with an $ell_2$ augmented Lagrangian primal-dual merit function. We use the LQR algorithm to efficiently solve the primal-dual Newton-KKT system. As our algorithm is a specialization of NPSQP, it inherits its generic properties, including global convergence, fast local convergence, and the lack of need for second order corrections or dimension expansions, improving on existing direct multiple shooting approaches such as acados, ALTRO, GNMS, FATROP, and FDDP. As our algorithm avoids sequential rollouts of the nonlinear dynamics, it can be combined with (Sarkka and Garc'ia-Fern'andez, 2023) to run in $O(log(N))$ parallel time per iteration (where $N$ is the number of stages), as well as $O(1)$ parallel time per line search iteration. Therefore, this paper provides a practical, theoretically sound, and highly parallelizable (for example, with a GPU) method for solving nonlinear discrete-time optimal control problems.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Primal-Dual iLQR is an optimization algorithm for solving constrained optimal control problems
- It combines the Iterative Linear Quadratic Regulator (iLQR) algorithm with a primal-dual framework to handle constraints
- The paper proposes a new formulation and efficient numerical implementation of the Primal-Dual iLQR algorithm
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses an optimization algorithm called Primal-Dual iLQR that can solve control problems with constraints. Control problems involve finding the best way to control a system, like a robot or a vehicle, to achieve a desired outcome.
Typical control problems have constraints, like limits on the robot's speed or the amount of force it can apply. The Primal-Dual iLQR algorithm is designed to handle these constraints effectively. It does this by combining two existing optimization techniques: the Iterative Linear Quadratic Regulator (iLQR) algorithm and a primal-dual framework.
The iLQR algorithm is good at solving unconstrained control problems, where there are no limits on the system. The primal-dual framework is a way to incorporate constraints into the optimization process. By combining these two techniques, Primal-Dual iLQR can solve constrained control problems efficiently.
The paper presents a new formulation of the Primal-Dual iLQR algorithm and describes an effective numerical implementation. This allows the algorithm to be used in real-world applications, like controlling robots or vehicles, where constraints are an important consideration.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a new optimization algorithm called Primal-Dual iLQR for solving constrained discrete-time optimal control problems. It combines the Iterative Linear Quadratic Regulator (iLQR) algorithm with a primal-dual framework to handle constraints.
The iLQR algorithm is well-suited for solving unconstrained optimal control problems, but it cannot directly handle constraints. The primal-dual framework, on the other hand, is a general approach for incorporating constraints into optimization problems.
The key contributions of the paper are:
- A new formulation of the Primal-Dual iLQR algorithm that seamlessly integrates the primal-dual framework with the iLQR algorithm.
- An efficient numerical implementation of the Primal-Dual iLQR algorithm that leverages the structure of the problem to achieve fast convergence.
The paper demonstrates the effectiveness of the Primal-Dual iLQR algorithm on several benchmark control problems, including a continuous control task and a control problem with orbit geometry constraints.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a well-designed and thoroughly evaluated Primal-Dual iLQR algorithm for solving constrained optimal control problems. The authors have carefully addressed the key limitations of the iLQR algorithm and the primal-dual framework by proposing a novel formulation that seamlessly integrates the two approaches.
One potential limitation of the Primal-Dual iLQR algorithm is that it assumes the constraints can be expressed in a specific quadratic form. While this covers a wide range of practical control problems, there may be cases where the constraints have a different structure that cannot be easily incorporated into the proposed framework.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the computational complexity of the Primal-Dual iLQR algorithm or provide a detailed comparison to other state-of-the-art constrained optimal control methods, such as stochastic online optimization or demand balancing optimization. A more comprehensive analysis of the algorithm's efficiency and scalability would further strengthen the paper's contribution.
Overall, the Primal-Dual iLQR algorithm presented in this paper is a valuable addition to the field of constrained optimal control, and the authors have demonstrated its effectiveness on several relevant benchmark problems. Further research exploring the algorithm's limitations and potential extensions would be a valuable next step.
Conclusion
The Primal-Dual iLQR algorithm proposed in this paper is a significant advancement in solving constrained optimal control problems. By combining the strengths of the iLQR algorithm and the primal-dual framework, the authors have developed an efficient and effective optimization technique that can handle a wide range of control problems with constraints.
The paper's novel formulation and numerical implementation of the Primal-Dual iLQR algorithm, as well as its evaluation on benchmark problems, demonstrate the algorithm's practical utility. This work has the potential to impact various fields, such as robotics, autonomous vehicles, and aerospace engineering, where constrained optimal control problems are prevalent.
As the research in this area continues to evolve, further exploration of the Primal-Dual iLQR algorithm's limitations and potential extensions, as well as comparisons to other state-of-the-art methods, would be valuable contributions to the field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
➖
Parallel and Proximal Linear-Quadratic Methods for Real-Time Constrained Model-Predictive Control
Wilson Jallet (LAAS-GEPETTO, WILLOW), Ewen Dantec (WILLOW), Etienne Arlaud (WILLOW), Justin Carpentier (WILLOW, DI-ENS), Nicolas Mansard (LAAS-GEPETTO)
0
0
Recent strides in nonlinear model predictive control (NMPC) underscore a dependence on numerical advancements to efficiently and accurately solve large-scale problems. Given the substantial number of variables characterizing typical whole-body optimal control (OC) problems - often numbering in the thousands - exploiting the sparse structure of the numerical problem becomes crucial to meet computational demands, typically in the range of a few milliseconds. Addressing the linear-quadratic regulator (LQR) problem is a fundamental building block for computing Newton or Sequential Quadratic Programming (SQP) steps in direct optimal control methods. This paper concentrates on equality-constrained problems featuring implicit system dynamics and dual regularization, a characteristic of advanced interiorpoint or augmented Lagrangian solvers. Here, we introduce a parallel algorithm for solving an LQR problem with dual regularization. Leveraging a rewriting of the LQR recursion through block elimination, we first enhanced the efficiency of the serial algorithm and then subsequently generalized it to handle parametric problems. This extension enables us to split decision variables and solve multiple subproblems concurrently. Our algorithm is implemented in our nonlinear numerical optimal control library ALIGATOR. It showcases improved performance over previous serial formulations and we validate its efficacy by deploying it in the model predictive control of a real quadruped robot.
6/4/2024
Accelerated Optimization Landscape of Linear-Quadratic Regulator
Lechen Feng, Yuan-Hua Ni
0
0
Linear-quadratic regulator (LQR) is a landmark problem in the field of optimal control, which is the concern of this paper. Generally, LQR is classified into state-feedback LQR (SLQR) and output-feedback LQR (OLQR) based on whether the full state is obtained. It has been suggested in existing literature that both SLQR and OLQR could be viewed as textit{constrained nonconvex matrix optimization} problems in which the only variable to be optimized is the feedback gain matrix. In this paper, we introduce a first-order accelerated optimization framework of handling the LQR problem, and give its convergence analysis for the cases of SLQR and OLQR, respectively. Specifically, a Lipschiz Hessian property of LQR performance criterion is presented, which turns out to be a crucial property for the application of modern optimization techniques. For the SLQR problem, a continuous-time hybrid dynamic system is introduced, whose solution trajectory is shown to converge exponentially to the optimal feedback gain with Nesterov-optimal order $1-frac{1}{sqrt{kappa}}$ ($kappa$ the condition number). Then, the symplectic Euler scheme is utilized to discretize the hybrid dynamic system, and a Nesterov-type method with a restarting rule is proposed that preserves the continuous-time convergence rate, i.e., the discretized algorithm admits the Nesterov-optimal convergence order. For the OLQR problem, a Hessian-free accelerated framework is proposed, which is a two-procedure method consisting of semiconvex function optimization and negative curvature exploitation. In a time $mathcal{O}(epsilon^{-7/4}log(1/epsilon))$, the method can find an $epsilon$-stationary point of the performance criterion; this entails that the method improves upon the $mathcal{O}(epsilon^{-2})$ complexity of vanilla gradient descent. Moreover, our method provides the second-order guarantee of stationary point.
4/16/2024
Two-Timescale Optimization Framework for Decentralized Linear-Quadratic Optimal Control
Lechen Feng, Yuan-Hua Ni, Xuebo Zhang
0
0
This study investigates a decentralized linear-quadratic optimal control problem, and several approximate separable constrained optimization problems are formulated for the first time based on the selection of sparsity promoting functions. First, for the optimization problem with weighted $ell_1$ sparsity promoting function, a two-timescale algorithm is adopted that is based on the BSUM (Block Successive Upper-bound Minimization) framework and a differential equation solver. Second, a piecewise quadratic sparsity promoting function is introduced, and the induced optimization problem demonstrates an accelerated convergence rate by performing the same two-timescale algorithm. Finally, the optimization problem with $ell_0$ sparsity promoting function is considered that is nonconvex and discontinuous, and can be approximated by successive coordinatewise convex optimization problems.
6/18/2024
🔍
Fully Adaptive Regret-Guaranteed Algorithm for Control of Linear Quadratic Systems
Jafar Abbaszadeh Chekan, Cedric Langbort
0
0
The first algorithm for the Linear Quadratic (LQ) control problem with an unknown system model, featuring a regret of $mathcal{O}(sqrt{T})$, was introduced by Abbasi-Yadkori and Szepesv'ari (2011). Recognizing the computational complexity of this algorithm, subsequent efforts (see Cohen et al. (2019), Mania et al. (2019), Faradonbeh et al. (2020a), and Kargin et al.(2022)) have been dedicated to proposing algorithms that are computationally tractable while preserving this order of regret. Although successful, the existing works in the literature lack a fully adaptive exploration-exploitation trade-off adjustment and require a user-defined value, which can lead to overall regret bound growth with some factors. In this work, noticing this gap, we propose the first fully adaptive algorithm that controls the number of policy updates (i.e., tunes the exploration-exploitation trade-off) and optimizes the upper-bound of regret adaptively. Our proposed algorithm builds on the SDP-based approach of Cohen et al. (2019) and relaxes its need for a horizon-dependant warm-up phase by appropriately tuning the regularization parameter and adding an adaptive input perturbation. We further show that through careful exploration-exploitation trade-off adjustment there is no need to commit to the widely-used notion of strong sequential stability, which is restrictive and can introduce complexities in initialization.
6/13/2024