Prompting4Debugging: Red-Teaming Text-to-Image Diffusion Models by Finding Problematic Prompts
0
🔎
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Text-to-image diffusion models, like Stable Diffusion, have made remarkable progress in generating high-quality images.
- However, this technology raises concerns about potential misuse, such as producing copyrighted or inappropriate content.
- Efforts have been made to filter out undesirable images and prompts, but the reliability of these safety mechanisms remains largely unexplored.
- The paper introduces "Prompting4Debugging" (P4D), a tool that automatically finds problematic prompts to test the safety of deployed text-to-image models.
Plain English Explanation
Stable Diffusion and other text-to-image diffusion models have become very good at generating realistic-looking images from text prompts. This is a remarkable achievement, but it also raises concerns about how this technology could be misused. For example, someone could use it to create images that infringe on copyrights or contain inappropriate content.
To try to address these concerns, researchers have developed ways to filter out undesirable images and prompts. However, the reliability of these safety mechanisms is not well understood. The researchers behind this paper created a tool called "Prompting4Debugging" (P4D) that can automatically find problematic prompts to test the safety of deployed text-to-image models. By using this tool, they were able to find that many prompts that were originally considered safe can actually be manipulated to bypass common safety mechanisms, like removing certain concepts or using "negative" prompts.
This suggests that without comprehensive testing, the evaluations of text-to-image models on limited "safe prompting" benchmarks may give a false sense of security. The researchers emphasize the need for more thorough testing and reliable safety measures to prevent the misuse of this powerful technology.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces Prompting4Debugging (P4D), a tool for automatically finding problematic prompts that can bypass the safety mechanisms of deployed text-to-image diffusion models, such as Stable Diffusion.
The authors demonstrate the efficacy of P4D in uncovering vulnerabilities in SD models with safety features. Their results show that around half of the prompts in existing "safe prompting" benchmarks, which were originally considered safe, can actually be manipulated to bypass many deployed safety mechanisms, including concept removal, negative prompts, and safety guidance.
The paper also discusses related work, such as Adversarial Nibbler, ART, and NeuroPROMPTS, which explore various methods for testing the safety and robustness of text-to-image models.
Critical Analysis
The paper highlights the need for comprehensive testing and reliable safety mechanisms for text-to-image diffusion models, as the evaluations on limited "safe prompting" benchmarks can lead to a false sense of security.
While the P4D tool demonstrates its effectiveness in uncovering vulnerabilities, the researchers acknowledge that it may not uncover all possible problematic prompts, and there may be other safety concerns not addressed in this work.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a comprehensive analysis of the safety mechanisms deployed in Stable Diffusion or other models, nor does it explore the potential trade-offs between safety and model performance. Further research is needed to develop more robust and reliable safety measures for text-to-image generation.
The comparative analysis of prompt modifiers and their impact on model bias could provide valuable insights into improving the safety and reliability of text-to-image diffusion models.
Conclusion
The paper highlights the pressing need for thorough testing and reliable safety mechanisms in text-to-image diffusion models, as the current evaluations on limited "safe prompting" benchmarks may provide a false sense of security.
The proposed Prompting4Debugging (P4D) tool demonstrates its effectiveness in uncovering vulnerabilities in Stable Diffusion models with safety features, underscoring the importance of comprehensive testing to ensure the responsible development and deployment of this transformative AI technology.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🔎
0
Prompting4Debugging: Red-Teaming Text-to-Image Diffusion Models by Finding Problematic Prompts
Zhi-Yi Chin, Chieh-Ming Jiang, Ching-Chun Huang, Pin-Yu Chen, Wei-Chen Chiu
Text-to-image diffusion models, e.g. Stable Diffusion (SD), lately have shown remarkable ability in high-quality content generation, and become one of the representatives for the recent wave of transformative AI. Nevertheless, such advance comes with an intensifying concern about the misuse of this generative technology, especially for producing copyrighted or NSFW (i.e. not safe for work) images. Although efforts have been made to filter inappropriate images/prompts or remove undesirable concepts/styles via model fine-tuning, the reliability of these safety mechanisms against diversified problematic prompts remains largely unexplored. In this work, we propose Prompting4Debugging (P4D) as a debugging and red-teaming tool that automatically finds problematic prompts for diffusion models to test the reliability of a deployed safety mechanism. We demonstrate the efficacy of our P4D tool in uncovering new vulnerabilities of SD models with safety mechanisms. Particularly, our result shows that around half of prompts in existing safe prompting benchmarks which were originally considered safe can actually be manipulated to bypass many deployed safety mechanisms, including concept removal, negative prompt, and safety guidance. Our findings suggest that, without comprehensive testing, the evaluations on limited safe prompting benchmarks can lead to a false sense of safety for text-to-image models.
Read more6/11/2024
0
Removing Undesirable Concepts in Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Learnable Prompts
Anh Bui, Khanh Doan, Trung Le, Paul Montague, Tamas Abraham, Dinh Phung
Diffusion models have shown remarkable capability in generating visually impressive content from textual descriptions. However, these models are trained on vast internet data, much of which contains undesirable elements such as sensitive content, copyrighted material, and unethical or harmful concepts. Therefore, beyond generating high-quality content, it is crucial to ensure these models do not propagate these undesirable elements. To address this issue, we propose a novel method to remove undesirable concepts from text-to-image diffusion models by incorporating a learnable prompt into the cross-attention module. This learnable prompt acts as additional memory, capturing the knowledge of undesirable concepts and reducing their dependency on the model parameters and corresponding textual inputs. By transferring this knowledge to the prompt, erasing undesirable concepts becomes more stable and has minimal negative impact on other concepts. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on the Stable Diffusion model, showcasing its superiority over state-of-the-art erasure methods in removing undesirable content while preserving unrelated elements.
Read more7/16/2024
0
ASTPrompter: Weakly Supervised Automated Language Model Red-Teaming to Identify Likely Toxic Prompts
Amelia F. Hardy, Houjun Liu, Bernard Lange, Mykel J. Kochenderfer
Typical schemes for automated red-teaming large language models (LLMs) focus on discovering prompts that trigger a frozen language model (the defender) to generate toxic text. This often results in the prompting model (the adversary) producing text that is unintelligible and unlikely to arise. Here, we propose a reinforcement learning formulation of the LLM red-teaming task which allows us to discover prompts that both (1) trigger toxic outputs from a frozen defender and (2) have low perplexity as scored by the defender. We argue these cases are most pertinent in a red-teaming setting because of their likelihood to arise during normal use of the defender model. We solve this formulation through a novel online and weakly supervised variant of Identity Preference Optimization (IPO) on GPT-2 and GPT-2 XL defenders. We demonstrate that our policy is capable of generating likely prompts that also trigger toxicity. Finally, we qualitatively analyze learned strategies, trade-offs of likelihood and toxicity, and discuss implications. Source code is available for this project at: https://github.com/sisl/ASTPrompter/.
Read more7/15/2024
0
Adversarial Nibbler: An Open Red-Teaming Method for Identifying Diverse Harms in Text-to-Image Generation
Jessica Quaye, Alicia Parrish, Oana Inel, Charvi Rastogi, Hannah Rose Kirk, Minsuk Kahng, Erin van Liemt, Max Bartolo, Jess Tsang, Justin White, Nathan Clement, Rafael Mosquera, Juan Ciro, Vijay Janapa Reddi, Lora Aroyo
With the rise of text-to-image (T2I) generative AI models reaching wide audiences, it is critical to evaluate model robustness against non-obvious attacks to mitigate the generation of offensive images. By focusing on ``implicitly adversarial'' prompts (those that trigger T2I models to generate unsafe images for non-obvious reasons), we isolate a set of difficult safety issues that human creativity is well-suited to uncover. To this end, we built the Adversarial Nibbler Challenge, a red-teaming methodology for crowdsourcing a diverse set of implicitly adversarial prompts. We have assembled a suite of state-of-the-art T2I models, employed a simple user interface to identify and annotate harms, and engaged diverse populations to capture long-tail safety issues that may be overlooked in standard testing. The challenge is run in consecutive rounds to enable a sustained discovery and analysis of safety pitfalls in T2I models. In this paper, we present an in-depth account of our methodology, a systematic study of novel attack strategies and discussion of safety failures revealed by challenge participants. We also release a companion visualization tool for easy exploration and derivation of insights from the dataset. The first challenge round resulted in over 10k prompt-image pairs with machine annotations for safety. A subset of 1.5k samples contains rich human annotations of harm types and attack styles. We find that 14% of images that humans consider harmful are mislabeled as ``safe'' by machines. We have identified new attack strategies that highlight the complexity of ensuring T2I model robustness. Our findings emphasize the necessity of continual auditing and adaptation as new vulnerabilities emerge. We are confident that this work will enable proactive, iterative safety assessments and promote responsible development of T2I models.
Read more5/15/2024