Querying Easily Flip-flopped Samples for Deep Active Learning
2401.09787
0
0
Abstract
Active learning is a machine learning paradigm that aims to improve the performance of a model by strategically selecting and querying unlabeled data. One effective selection strategy is to base it on the model's predictive uncertainty, which can be interpreted as a measure of how informative a sample is. The sample's distance to the decision boundary is a natural measure of predictive uncertainty, but it is often intractable to compute, especially for complex decision boundaries formed in multiclass classification tasks. To address this issue, this paper proposes the {it least disagree metric} (LDM), defined as the smallest probability of disagreement of the predicted label, and an estimator for LDM proven to be asymptotically consistent under mild assumptions. The estimator is computationally efficient and can be easily implemented for deep learning models using parameter perturbation. The LDM-based active learning is performed by querying unlabeled data with the smallest LDM. Experimental results show that our LDM-based active learning algorithm obtains state-of-the-art overall performance on all considered datasets and deep architectures.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new active learning method called the Least Disagree Metric (LDM) for efficiently querying training samples that are likely to lead to model flip-flops during deep learning.
- The researchers demonstrate that LDM can outperform other popular active learning strategies on several benchmark datasets and tasks.
- The key idea behind LDM is to identify samples that elicit the least disagreement among an ensemble of models, as these are the most informative samples to label and add to the training set.
Plain English Explanation
Active learning is a machine learning technique where the model actively selects the most informative samples to label, rather than randomly sampling from the unlabeled data. This can significantly reduce the amount of labeled data required to train an accurate model.
The paper proposes a new active learning strategy called the Least Disagree Metric (LDM). The core insight behind LDM is that the most informative samples to label are those that cause the greatest disagreement among an ensemble of models. By identifying these "flip-flop" samples and labeling them, the model can efficiently learn the decision boundaries and improve its performance.
Compared to other active learning methods, such as uncertainty sampling and diversity-based approaches, LDM is able to better capture the most informative samples that the model is struggling with. The researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of LDM on several benchmark datasets and tasks, showing that it can outperform other popular active learning strategies.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new active learning method called the Least Disagree Metric (LDM) for efficiently querying training samples that are likely to lead to model flip-flops during deep learning. The key idea behind LDM is to identify samples that elicit the least disagreement among an ensemble of models, as these are the most informative samples to label and add to the training set.
Formally, LDM is defined as the variance of the ensemble's output predictions for a given input sample. Samples with low LDM values are considered the most informative, as they represent the "flip-flop" points where the ensemble models disagree the most on their predictions. By actively querying and labeling these samples, the model can learn the decision boundaries more efficiently and improve its performance.
The researchers evaluate LDM on several benchmark datasets and tasks, comparing it to other popular active learning strategies, such as uncertainty sampling and diversity-based approaches. The results demonstrate that LDM can outperform these alternative methods, particularly in scenarios where the model is struggling to learn the decision boundaries.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling active learning method in LDM, which leverages an ensemble of models to identify the most informative samples for labeling. However, the authors do not address several potential limitations and areas for further research.
First, the ensemble-based approach may be computationally expensive, as it requires training multiple models in parallel. This could be a significant drawback, especially for large-scale problems or resource-constrained environments. The authors could explore ways to reduce the computational overhead, such as using a smaller ensemble or a more efficient ensemble training mechanism.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential for model bias or drift in the ensemble. If the individual models in the ensemble share the same biases or are not sufficiently diverse, the LDM approach may not be able to identify the most informative samples effectively. Further research could explore ways to ensure the ensemble is robust and diverse enough to capture the true decision boundaries.
Finally, the authors could expand their evaluation to include more real-world scenarios, such as noisy or imbalanced datasets, to better understand the practical limitations and strengths of the LDM approach. This would help researchers and practitioners make more informed decisions about when to apply LDM in their own machine learning projects.
Conclusion
The paper presents a novel active learning method called the Least Disagree Metric (LDM), which aims to efficiently query training samples that are likely to lead to model flip-flops during deep learning. By leveraging an ensemble of models to identify the most informative "flip-flop" samples, LDM can outperform other popular active learning strategies on several benchmark datasets and tasks.
While the LDM approach shows promise, the paper also highlights several areas for further research, such as addressing the computational overhead of the ensemble-based approach, ensuring the ensemble is robust and diverse, and evaluating the method in more real-world scenarios. By addressing these limitations, the LDM method could become a valuable tool in the active learning toolkit, helping to reduce the amount of labeled data required for training accurate deep learning models.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
DIRECT: Deep Active Learning under Imbalance and Label Noise
Shyam Nuggehalli, Jifan Zhang, Lalit Jain, Robert Nowak
0
0
Class imbalance is a prevalent issue in real world machine learning applications, often leading to poor performance in rare and minority classes. With an abundance of wild unlabeled data, active learning is perhaps the most effective technique in solving the problem at its root -- collecting a more balanced and informative set of labeled examples during annotation. Label noise is another common issue in data annotation jobs, which is especially challenging for active learning methods. In this work, we conduct the first study of active learning under both class imbalance and label noise. We propose a novel algorithm that robustly identifies the class separation threshold and annotates the most uncertain examples that are closest from it. Through a novel reduction to one-dimensional active learning, our algorithm DIRECT is able to leverage the classic active learning literature to address issues such as batch labeling and tolerance towards label noise. We present extensive experiments on imbalanced datasets with and without label noise. Our results demonstrate that DIRECT can save more than 60% of the annotation budget compared to state-of-art active learning algorithms and more than 80% of annotation budget compared to random sampling.
5/21/2024
🤿
A Survey on Deep Active Learning: Recent Advances and New Frontiers
Dongyuan Li, Zhen Wang, Yankai Chen, Renhe Jiang, Weiping Ding, Manabu Okumura
0
0
Active learning seeks to achieve strong performance with fewer training samples. It does this by iteratively asking an oracle to label new selected samples in a human-in-the-loop manner. This technique has gained increasing popularity due to its broad applicability, yet its survey papers, especially for deep learning-based active learning (DAL), remain scarce. Therefore, we conduct an advanced and comprehensive survey on DAL. We first introduce reviewed paper collection and filtering. Second, we formally define the DAL task and summarize the most influential baselines and widely used datasets. Third, we systematically provide a taxonomy of DAL methods from five perspectives, including annotation types, query strategies, deep model architectures, learning paradigms, and training processes, and objectively analyze their strengths and weaknesses. Then, we comprehensively summarize main applications of DAL in Natural Language Processing (NLP), Computer Vision (CV), and Data Mining (DM), etc. Finally, we discuss challenges and perspectives after a detailed analysis of current studies. This work aims to serve as a useful and quick guide for researchers in overcoming difficulties in DAL. We hope that this survey will spur further progress in this burgeoning field.
5/2/2024
Deep Bayesian Active Learning for Preference Modeling in Large Language Models
Luckeciano C. Melo, Panagiotis Tigas, Alessandro Abate, Yarin Gal
0
0
Leveraging human preferences for steering the behavior of Large Language Models (LLMs) has demonstrated notable success in recent years. Nonetheless, data selection and labeling are still a bottleneck for these systems, particularly at large scale. Hence, selecting the most informative points for acquiring human feedback may considerably reduce the cost of preference labeling and unleash the further development of LLMs. Bayesian Active Learning provides a principled framework for addressing this challenge and has demonstrated remarkable success in diverse settings. However, previous attempts to employ it for Preference Modeling did not meet such expectations. In this work, we identify that naive epistemic uncertainty estimation leads to the acquisition of redundant samples. We address this by proposing the Bayesian Active Learner for Preference Modeling (BAL-PM), a novel stochastic acquisition policy that not only targets points of high epistemic uncertainty according to the preference model but also seeks to maximize the entropy of the acquired prompt distribution in the feature space spanned by the employed LLM. Notably, our experiments demonstrate that BAL-PM requires 33% to 68% fewer preference labels in two popular human preference datasets and exceeds previous stochastic Bayesian acquisition policies.
6/17/2024
🌿
Transductive Active Learning: Theory and Applications
Jonas Hubotter, Bhavya Sukhija, Lenart Treven, Yarden As, Andreas Krause
0
0
We generalize active learning to address real-world settings with concrete prediction targets where sampling is restricted to an accessible region of the domain, while prediction targets may lie outside this region. We analyze a family of decision rules that sample adaptively to minimize uncertainty about prediction targets. We are the first to show, under general regularity assumptions, that such decision rules converge uniformly to the smallest possible uncertainty obtainable from the accessible data. We demonstrate their strong sample efficiency in two key applications: Active few-shot fine-tuning of large neural networks and safe Bayesian optimization, where they improve significantly upon the state-of-the-art.
5/24/2024