Reliability and Interpretability in Science and Deep Learning

Read original: arXiv:2401.07359 - Published 6/13/2024 by Luigi Scorzato

🤿

Overview

Examines the importance of reliability and interpretability in science and deep learning models
Discusses sources of errors and methods for assessing the reliability of model predictions
Explores techniques for interpreting the inner workings of deep learning models to improve their trustworthiness

Plain English Explanation

The paper focuses on the critical issues of reliability and interpretability in scientific research and deep learning models. Reliability refers to the consistency and trustworthiness of model predictions, while interpretability is about understanding how a model arrives at its outputs.

In the scientific domain, sources of errors can come from factors like measurement errors, sampling biases, and model assumptions. The paper discusses ways to assess the reliability of scientific models, such as quantifying uncertainty, cross-validation, and sensitivity analysis.

Similarly, in machine learning and deep learning, there are various sources of unreliability, including noisy or biased training data, model overfitting, and lack of robustness to distributional shifts. The paper explores methods for improving the reliability of deep learning models, such as leveraging interpretable models and using probabilistic techniques to better understand their predictions.

Interpretability is crucial for building trust in deep learning models, especially in high-stakes domains like healthcare and finance. The paper discusses techniques for interpreting the inner workings of deep neural networks to make their decision-making more transparent and explainable.

Overall, the paper highlights the importance of reliability and interpretability in both scientific research and deep learning, and presents various methods and approaches to address these critical challenges.

Technical Explanation

The paper examines the importance of reliability and interpretability in scientific research and deep learning models. Reliability refers to the consistency and trustworthiness of model predictions, while interpretability is about understanding how a model arrives at its outputs.

In the scientific domain, the paper discusses various sources of errors that can affect the reliability of models, such as measurement errors, sampling biases, and model assumptions. It outlines methods for assessing the reliability of scientific models, including quantifying uncertainty, cross-validation, and sensitivity analysis.

Similarly, in machine learning and deep learning, the paper explores sources of unreliability, such as noisy or biased training data, model overfitting, and lack of robustness to distributional shifts. It presents techniques for improving the reliability of deep learning models, such as leveraging interpretable models and using probabilistic techniques to better understand their predictions.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges and importance of reliability and interpretability in both scientific research and deep learning. However, it does not delve deeply into the specific limitations or potential drawbacks of the proposed methods. For example, the paper could have discussed the trade-offs between model complexity, interpretability, and reliability, or the practical challenges of implementing some of the suggested techniques in real-world scenarios.

Additionally, the paper could have explored the ethical implications of improving interpretability in deep learning models, particularly in high-stakes applications where model decisions can have significant impacts on individuals or society. Issues such as bias, fairness, and transparency should be considered when developing more interpretable deep learning systems.

Finally, the paper could have addressed the need for interdisciplinary collaboration between domain experts, statisticians, and machine learning researchers to tackle the complex challenges of reliability and interpretability in both scientific and deep learning domains.

Conclusion

The paper highlights the critical importance of reliability and interpretability in scientific research and deep learning models. By understanding the sources of errors and developing methods to assess and improve the reliability of model predictions, researchers can enhance the trustworthiness and credibility of their work.

Similarly, improving the interpretability of deep learning models is essential for building trust and transparency, particularly in high-stakes applications. The paper presents various techniques for interpreting the inner workings of deep neural networks, paving the way for more explainable and trustworthy artificial intelligence systems.

Overall, the paper's focus on the intersection of reliability and interpretability in science and deep learning is a valuable contribution to the ongoing efforts to make these fields more robust, transparent, and accountable.

This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

🤿

Reliability and Interpretability in Science and Deep Learning

Luigi Scorzato

In recent years, the question of the reliability of Machine Learning (ML) methods has acquired significant importance, and the analysis of the associated uncertainties has motivated a growing amount of research. However, most of these studies have applied standard error analysis to ML models, and in particular Deep Neural Network (DNN) models, which represent a rather significant departure from standard scientific modelling. It is therefore necessary to integrate the standard error analysis with a deeper epistemological analysis of the possible differences between DNN models and standard scientific modelling and the possible implications of these differences in the assessment of reliability. This article offers several contributions. First, it emphasises the ubiquitous role of model assumptions (both in ML and traditional Science) against the illusion of theory-free science. Secondly, model assumptions are analysed from the point of view of their (epistemic) complexity, which is shown to be language-independent. It is argued that the high epistemic complexity of DNN models hinders the estimate of their reliability and also their prospect of long-term progress. Some potential ways forward are suggested. Thirdly, this article identifies the close relation between a model's epistemic complexity and its interpretability, as introduced in the context of responsible AI. This clarifies in which sense, and to what extent, the lack of understanding of a model (black-box problem) impacts its interpretability in a way that is independent of individual skills. It also clarifies how interpretability is a precondition for assessing the reliability of any model, which cannot be based on statistical analysis alone. This article focuses on the comparison between traditional scientific models and DNN models. But, Random Forest and Logistic Regression models are also briefly considered.

6/13/2024

🤿

A Structured Review of Literature on Uncertainty in Machine Learning & Deep Learning

Fahimeh Fakour, Ali Mosleh, Ramin Ramezani

The adaptation and use of Machine Learning (ML) in our daily lives has led to concerns in lack of transparency, privacy, reliability, among others. As a result, we are seeing research in niche areas such as interpretability, causality, bias and fairness, and reliability. In this survey paper, we focus on a critical concern for adaptation of ML in risk-sensitive applications, namely understanding and quantifying uncertainty. Our paper approaches this topic in a structured way, providing a review of the literature in the various facets that uncertainty is enveloped in the ML process. We begin by defining uncertainty and its categories (e.g., aleatoric and epistemic), understanding sources of uncertainty (e.g., data and model), and how uncertainty can be assessed in terms of uncertainty quantification techniques (Ensembles, Bayesian Neural Networks, etc.). As part of our assessment and understanding of uncertainty in the ML realm, we cover metrics for uncertainty quantification for a single sample, dataset, and metrics for accuracy of the uncertainty estimation itself. This is followed by discussions on calibration (model and uncertainty), and decision making under uncertainty. Thus, we provide a more complete treatment of uncertainty: from the sources of uncertainty to the decision-making process. We have focused the review of uncertainty quantification methods on Deep Learning (DL), while providing the necessary background for uncertainty discussion within ML in general. Key contributions in this review are broadening the scope of uncertainty discussion, as well as an updated review of uncertainty quantification methods in DL.

6/4/2024

🤿

Explaining Deep Neural Networks by Leveraging Intrinsic Methods

Biagio La Rosa

Despite their impact on the society, deep neural networks are often regarded as black-box models due to their intricate structures and the absence of explanations for their decisions. This opacity poses a significant challenge to AI systems wider adoption and trustworthiness. This thesis addresses this issue by contributing to the field of eXplainable AI, focusing on enhancing the interpretability of deep neural networks. The core contributions lie in introducing novel techniques aimed at making these networks more interpretable by leveraging an analysis of their inner workings. Specifically, the contributions are threefold. Firstly, the thesis introduces designs for self-explanatory deep neural networks, such as the integration of external memory for interpretability purposes and the usage of prototype and constraint-based layers across several domains. Secondly, this research delves into novel investigations on neurons within trained deep neural networks, shedding light on overlooked phenomena related to their activation values. Lastly, the thesis conducts an analysis of the application of explanatory techniques in the field of visual analytics, exploring the maturity of their adoption and the potential of these systems to convey explanations to users effectively.

7/18/2024

✨

Between Randomness and Arbitrariness: Some Lessons for Reliable Machine Learning at Scale

A. Feder Cooper

To develop rigorous knowledge about ML models -- and the systems in which they are embedded -- we need reliable measurements. But reliable measurement is fundamentally challenging, and touches on issues of reproducibility, scalability, uncertainty quantification, epistemology, and more. This dissertation addresses criteria needed to take reliability seriously: both criteria for designing meaningful metrics, and for methodologies that ensure that we can dependably and efficiently measure these metrics at scale and in practice. In doing so, this dissertation articulates a research vision for a new field of scholarship at the intersection of machine learning, law, and policy. Within this frame, we cover topics that fit under three different themes: (1) quantifying and mitigating sources of arbitrariness in ML, (2) taming randomness in uncertainty estimation and optimization algorithms, in order to achieve scalability without sacrificing reliability, and (3) providing methods for evaluating generative-AI systems, with specific focuses on quantifying memorization in language models and training latent diffusion models on open-licensed data. By making contributions in these three themes, this dissertation serves as an empirical proof by example that research on reliable measurement for machine learning is intimately and inescapably bound up with research in law and policy. These different disciplines pose similar research questions about reliable measurement in machine learning. They are, in fact, two complementary sides of the same research vision, which, broadly construed, aims to construct machine-learning systems that cohere with broader societal values.

8/13/2024