ROB 204: Introduction to Human-Robot Systems at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Curriculum design for an undergraduate robotics course at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
- Covers key technical topics and the course schedule
- Provides insights into the evolution of the course based on lessons learned
Plain English Explanation
This paper discusses the design and implementation of an undergraduate robotics course, ROB 204: Introduction to Human-Robot Systems, at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. The course aims to introduce students to the fundamentals of human-robot interaction and systems.
The paper outlines the technical topics covered in the course, including robot kinematics, control, perception, and planning, as well as their integration with human-robot interaction. The course schedule is also provided, which includes lectures, labs, and projects that allow students to apply the concepts they've learned.
The authors share the lessons they've learned from the evolution of the course over time, highlighting the importance of balancing participation and incorporating large language models to enhance the learning experience. They also discuss the challenges of anticipating human-object interactions and planning for prosocial robot behaviors.
Overall, this paper provides a comprehensive overview of the curriculum design and evolution of an undergraduate robotics course, offering valuable insights for educators and researchers in the field of human-robot interaction.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents the curriculum design and implementation of an undergraduate robotics course, ROB 204: Introduction to Human-Robot Systems, at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. The course aims to provide students with a comprehensive understanding of human-robot interaction and systems.
The technical topics covered in the course include robot kinematics, control, perception, and planning, as well as their integration with human-robot interaction. The authors discuss the evolution of the course curriculum, which has been refined over time based on lessons learned. They highlight the importance of balancing participation and incorporating large language models to enhance the learning experience.
The course schedule includes lectures, labs, and projects that allow students to apply the concepts they've learned. The authors also discuss the challenges of anticipating human-object interactions and planning for prosocial robot behaviors, which are important considerations in the field of human-robot interaction.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a comprehensive overview of the curriculum design and evolution of an undergraduate robotics course, but it does not delve deeply into the specific challenges or limitations of the course. While the authors mention the importance of balancing participation and incorporating large language models, they do not provide detailed insights into the effectiveness or implementation of these strategies.
Additionally, the paper could have explored the potential impact of the course on students' learning outcomes and their ability to apply the concepts in real-world scenarios. It would have been valuable to understand the feedback from students and how it has influenced the course's development over time.
Furthermore, the paper could have addressed the broader implications of the course for the field of human-robot interaction, such as the potential applications of the skills and knowledge gained by students, or the contribution of the course to the overall understanding of human-robot systems.
Conclusion
The paper presents a detailed overview of the curriculum design and implementation of an undergraduate robotics course, ROB 204: Introduction to Human-Robot Systems, at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. The authors share the key technical topics covered in the course, as well as the lessons they've learned from the evolution of the curriculum.
The insights provided in this paper can be valuable for educators and researchers in the field of human-robot interaction, as they showcase the importance of balancing participation, incorporating advanced technologies, and addressing the challenges of anticipating human behavior and planning for prosocial robot behaviors. The paper serves as a useful resource for those interested in designing and implementing effective undergraduate robotics courses that prepare students for the rapidly evolving field of human-robot systems.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
ROB 204: Introduction to Human-Robot Systems at the University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Leia Stirling, Joseph Montgomery, Mark Draelos, Christoforos Mavrogiannis, Lionel P. Robert Jr., Odest Chadwicke Jenkins
The University of Michigan Robotics program focuses on the study of embodied intelligence that must sense, reason, act, and work with people to improve quality of life and productivity equitably across society. ROB 204, part of the core curriculum towards the undergraduate degree in Robotics, introduces students to topics that enable conceptually designing a robotic system to address users' needs from a sociotechnical context. Students are introduced to human-robot interaction (HRI) concepts and the process for socially-engaged design with a Learn-Reinforce-Integrate approach. In this paper, we discuss the course topics and our teaching methodology, and provide recommendations for delivering this material. Overall, students leave the course with a new understanding and appreciation for how human capabilities can inform requirements for a robotics system, how humans can interact with a robot, and how to assess the usability of robotic systems.
Read more5/27/2024
🤯
0
Lessons Learned: The Evolution of an Undergraduate Robotics Course in Computer Science
R. Pito Salas
Seven years ago (2016), we began integrating Robotics into our Computer Science curriculum. This paper explores the mission, initial goals and objectives, specific choices we made along the way, and why and outcomes. Of course, we were not the first to do so. Our contribution in this paper is to describe a seven-year experience in the hope that others going down this road will benefit, perhaps avoiding some missteps and dead-ends. We offer our answers to many questions that anyone undertaking bootstrapping a new robotics program may have to deal with. At the end of the paper, we discuss a set of lessons learned, including striking the right balance between depth and breadth in syllabus design and material organization, the significance of utilizing physical robots and criteria for selecting a suitable robotics platform, insights into the scope and design of a robotics lab, the necessity of standardizing hardware and software configurations, along with implementation methods, and strategies for preparing students for the steep learning curve.
Read more4/30/2024
0
Undergraduate Robotics Education with General Instructors using a Student-Centered Personalized Learning Framework
Rui Wu, David J Feil-Seifer, Ponkoj C Shill, Hossein Jamali, Sergiu Dascalu, Fred Harris, Laura Rosof, Bryan Hutchins, Marjorie Campo Ringler, Zhen Zhu
Recent advancements in robotics, including applications like self-driving cars, unmanned systems, and medical robots, have had a significant impact on the job market. On one hand, big robotics companies offer training programs based on the job requirements. However, these training programs may not be as beneficial as general robotics programs offered by universities or community colleges. On the other hand, community colleges and universities face challenges with required resources, especially qualified instructors, to offer students advanced robotics education. Furthermore, the diverse backgrounds of undergraduate students present additional challenges. Some students bring extensive industry experiences, while others are newcomers to the field. To address these challenges, we propose a student-centered personalized learning framework for robotics. This framework allows a general instructor to teach undergraduate-level robotics courses by breaking down course topics into smaller components with well-defined topic dependencies, structured as a graph. This modular approach enables students to choose their learning path, catering to their unique preferences and pace. Moreover, our framework's flexibility allows for easy customization of teaching materials to meet the specific needs of host institutions. In addition to teaching materials, a frequently-asked-questions document would be prepared for a general instructor. If students' robotics questions cannot be answered by the instructor, the answers to these questions may be included in this document. For questions not covered in this document, we can gather and address them through collaboration with the robotics community and course content creators. Our user study results demonstrate the promise of this method in delivering undergraduate-level robotics education tailored to individual learning outcomes and preferences.
Read more6/13/2024
0
Designing for Fairness in Human-Robot Interactions
Houston Claure
The foundation of successful human collaboration is deeply rooted in the principles of fairness. As robots are increasingly prevalent in various parts of society where they are working alongside groups and teams of humans, their ability to understand and act according to principles of fairness becomes crucial for their effective integration. This is especially critical when robots are part of multi-human teams, where they must make continuous decisions regarding the allocation of resources. These resources can be material, such as tools, or communicative, such as gaze direction, and must be distributed fairly among team members to ensure optimal team performance and healthy group dynamics. Therefore, our research focuses on understanding how robots can effectively participate within human groups by making fair decisions while contributing positively to group dynamics and outcomes. In this paper, I discuss advances toward ensuring that robots are capable of considering human notions of fairness in their decision-making.
Read more6/3/2024