Towards Robust Recommendation: A Review and an Adversarial Robustness Evaluation Library
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper provides a comprehensive review of the field of adversarial robustness in recommender systems, highlighting the importance of developing more reliable and secure recommendation models.
- The authors also introduce an open-source library called "AdveRec" that allows researchers and practitioners to easily evaluate the adversarial robustness of their recommender systems.
Plain English Explanation
Recommender systems are algorithms that suggest products, services, or content to users based on their past preferences and behaviors. These systems are widely used in e-commerce, entertainment platforms, and social media to enhance the user experience and increase engagement.
However, recommender systems can be vulnerable to adversarial attacks, where malicious actors manipulate the input data to trick the system into making incorrect recommendations. This can have serious consequences, such as users being recommended inappropriate or harmful content, or businesses losing revenue due to ineffective recommendations.
To address this issue, the authors of this paper have conducted a thorough review of the field of adversarial robustness in machine learning, with a specific focus on recommender systems. They have identified key challenges and research directions in this area, and have developed an open-source library called "AdveRec" to help researchers and practitioners evaluate the adversarial robustness of their recommender models.
The AdveRec library provides a standardized framework for assessing the robustness of recommender systems to various types of adversarial attacks, such as adding or removing user-item interactions, or manipulating the content of items. By using this library, researchers and developers can better understand the vulnerabilities of their recommender systems and work to improve their adversarial robustness.
Overall, this paper and the accompanying AdveRec library represent an important step towards building more secure and trustworthy recommender systems that can better protect users and businesses from malicious attacks.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing a comprehensive overview of the field of adversarial robustness in recommender systems. The authors discuss the different types of adversarial attacks that can be leveraged against these systems, such as adding or removing user-item interactions, manipulating item content, and exploiting the biases of the recommendation algorithms.
The authors then review the various approaches that have been proposed to improve the adversarial robustness of recommender systems, including robust model training, adversarial data augmentation, and robust recommendation algorithms. They discuss the strengths and limitations of these approaches, and identify key research challenges and open problems in the field.
To address these challenges, the authors introduce the AdveRec library, an open-source tool for evaluating the adversarial robustness of recommender systems. The library provides a standardized framework for generating and applying various types of adversarial attacks, as well as metrics for quantifying the robustness of recommender models. The authors demonstrate the use of the AdveRec library on several benchmark datasets and recommender algorithms, showcasing its effectiveness in assessing and comparing the adversarial robustness of different systems.
Critical Analysis
The authors have provided a comprehensive and insightful review of the field of adversarial robustness in recommender systems, highlighting key challenges and research directions. The introduction of the AdveRec library is a particularly valuable contribution, as it can help accelerate research and development in this important area.
One potential limitation of the paper is that it focuses primarily on the technical aspects of adversarial robustness, and does not delve deeply into the broader societal implications of these issues. For example, the paper does not discuss how adversarial attacks on recommender systems can exacerbate issues of misinformation, polarization, and algorithmic bias. It would be useful for the authors to explore these broader societal concerns in future work.
Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed comparison of the AdveRec library with other existing tools for evaluating the adversarial robustness of recommender systems. It would be helpful for the authors to situate their library within the broader landscape of available tools and frameworks, and to highlight its unique features and capabilities.
Conclusion
This paper represents an important contribution to the field of adversarial robustness in recommender systems. By providing a comprehensive review of the state-of-the-art and introducing the AdveRec library, the authors have laid the groundwork for further research and development in this critical area.
As recommender systems become increasingly ubiquitous in our digital lives, ensuring their robustness and security is of paramount importance. The insights and tools presented in this paper can help researchers and practitioners build more reliable and trustworthy recommendation models, ultimately enhancing the user experience and protecting businesses and individuals from malicious attacks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Towards Robust Recommendation: A Review and an Adversarial Robustness Evaluation Library
Lei Cheng, Xiaowen Huang, Jitao Sang, Jian Yu
Recently, recommender system has achieved significant success. However, due to the openness of recommender systems, they remain vulnerable to malicious attacks. Additionally, natural noise in training data and issues such as data sparsity can also degrade the performance of recommender systems. Therefore, enhancing the robustness of recommender systems has become an increasingly important research topic. In this survey, we provide a comprehensive overview of the robustness of recommender systems. Based on our investigation, we categorize the robustness of recommender systems into adversarial robustness and non-adversarial robustness. In the adversarial robustness, we introduce the fundamental principles and classical methods of recommender system adversarial attacks and defenses. In the non-adversarial robustness, we analyze non-adversarial robustness from the perspectives of data sparsity, natural noise, and data imbalance. Additionally, we summarize commonly used datasets and evaluation metrics for evaluating the robustness of recommender systems. Finally, we also discuss the current challenges in the field of recommender system robustness and potential future research directions. Additionally, to facilitate fair and efficient evaluation of attack and defense methods in adversarial robustness, we propose an adversarial robustness evaluation library--ShillingREC, and we conduct evaluations of basic attack models and recommendation models. ShillingREC project is released at https://github.com/chengleileilei/ShillingREC.
Read more4/30/2024
0
A practical approach to evaluating the adversarial distance for machine learning classifiers
Georg Siedel, Ekagra Gupta, Andrey Morozov
Robustness is critical for machine learning (ML) classifiers to ensure consistent performance in real-world applications where models may encounter corrupted or adversarial inputs. In particular, assessing the robustness of classifiers to adversarial inputs is essential to protect systems from vulnerabilities and thus ensure safety in use. However, methods to accurately compute adversarial robustness have been challenging for complex ML models and high-dimensional data. Furthermore, evaluations typically measure adversarial accuracy on specific attack budgets, limiting the informative value of the resulting metrics. This paper investigates the estimation of the more informative adversarial distance using iterative adversarial attacks and a certification approach. Combined, the methods provide a comprehensive evaluation of adversarial robustness by computing estimates for the upper and lower bounds of the adversarial distance. We present visualisations and ablation studies that provide insights into how this evaluation method should be applied and parameterised. We find that our adversarial attack approach is effective compared to related implementations, while the certification method falls short of expectations. The approach in this paper should encourage a more informative way of evaluating the adversarial robustness of ML classifiers.
Read more9/6/2024
0
Improving the Shortest Plank: Vulnerability-Aware Adversarial Training for Robust Recommender System
Kaike Zhang, Qi Cao, Yunfan Wu, Fei Sun, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng
Recommender systems play a pivotal role in mitigating information overload in various fields. Nonetheless, the inherent openness of these systems introduces vulnerabilities, allowing attackers to insert fake users into the system's training data to skew the exposure of certain items, known as poisoning attacks. Adversarial training has emerged as a notable defense mechanism against such poisoning attacks within recommender systems. Existing adversarial training methods apply perturbations of the same magnitude across all users to enhance system robustness against attacks. Yet, in reality, we find that attacks often affect only a subset of users who are vulnerable. These perturbations of indiscriminate magnitude make it difficult to balance effective protection for vulnerable users without degrading recommendation quality for those who are not affected. To address this issue, our research delves into understanding user vulnerability. Considering that poisoning attacks pollute the training data, we note that the higher degree to which a recommender system fits users' training data correlates with an increased likelihood of users incorporating attack information, indicating their vulnerability. Leveraging these insights, we introduce the Vulnerability-aware Adversarial Training (VAT), designed to defend against poisoning attacks in recommender systems. VAT employs a novel vulnerability-aware function to estimate users' vulnerability based on the degree to which the system fits them. Guided by this estimation, VAT applies perturbations of adaptive magnitude to each user, not only reducing the success ratio of attacks but also preserving, and potentially enhancing, the quality of recommendations. Comprehensive experiments confirm VAT's superior defensive capabilities across different recommendation models and against various types of attacks.
Read more9/27/2024
🛸
0
Robust Information Retrieval
Yu-An Liu, Ruqing Zhang, Jiafeng Guo, Maarten de Rijke
Beyond effectiveness, the robustness of an information retrieval (IR) system is increasingly attracting attention. When deployed, a critical technology such as IR should not only deliver strong performance on average but also have the ability to handle a variety of exceptional situations. In recent years, research into the robustness of IR has seen significant growth, with numerous researchers offering extensive analyses and proposing myriad strategies to address robustness challenges. In this tutorial, we first provide background information covering the basics and a taxonomy of robustness in IR. Then, we examine adversarial robustness and out-of-distribution (OOD) robustness within IR-specific contexts, extensively reviewing recent progress in methods to enhance robustness. The tutorial concludes with a discussion on the robustness of IR in the context of large language models (LLMs), highlighting ongoing challenges and promising directions for future research. This tutorial aims to generate broader attention to robustness issues in IR, facilitate an understanding of the relevant literature, and lower the barrier to entry for interested researchers and practitioners.
Read more6/14/2024