RoT: Enhancing Large Language Models with Reflection on Search Trees
2404.05449
0
0
Abstract
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capability in reasoning and planning when integrated with tree-search-based prompting methods. However, since these methods ignore the previous search experiences, they often make the same mistakes in the search process. To address this issue, we introduce Reflection on search Trees (RoT), an LLM reflection framework designed to improve the performance of tree-search-based prompting methods. It uses a strong LLM to summarize guidelines from previous tree search experiences to enhance the ability of a weak LLM. The guidelines are instructions about solving this task through tree search which can prevent the weak LLMs from making similar mistakes in the past search process. In addition, we proposed a novel state selection method, which identifies the critical information from historical search processes to help RoT generate more specific and meaningful guidelines. In our extensive experiments, we find that RoT significantly improves the performance of LLMs in reasoning or planning tasks with various tree-search-based prompting methods (e.g., BFS and MCTS). Non-tree-search-based prompting methods such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) can also benefit from RoT guidelines since RoT can provide task-specific knowledge collected from the search experience.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper introduces a new approach called "RoT" (Reflection on Search Trees) that aims to enhance the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating reflection on search trees during the training and inference process.
- The key idea is to enable LLMs to learn from the process of searching through decision trees, leading to improved reasoning, planning, and problem-solving abilities.
- The paper presents the RoT framework, describes experiments evaluating its performance, and discusses the potential benefits and limitations of this approach.
Plain English Explanation
The paper introduces a new technique called "Reflection on Search Trees" (RoT) to improve the capabilities of large language models (LLMs). LLMs are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text, but they can sometimes struggle with complex reasoning and problem-solving tasks.
The core idea behind RoT is to have the LLM learn from the process of searching through decision trees, which are a common way to represent and solve complex problems. By reflecting on this search process, the LLM can potentially gain a better understanding of how to break down problems, consider different options, and make more informed decisions.
The researchers describe the RoT framework and conduct experiments to evaluate its performance. They find that incorporating RoT can lead to improvements in the LLM's ability to reason, plan, and solve problems, compared to a standard LLM approach.
The paper discusses the potential benefits of RoT, such as enhancing the LLM's general intelligence and problem-solving skills. It also acknowledges some of the limitations and areas for further research, such as the computational overhead and the need to further refine the RoT approach.
Overall, the RoT technique represents a promising direction for improving the capabilities of large language models, with potential applications in a wide range of domains, from enhancing general agent capabilities with low-parameter LLMs to enabling LLMs to help with robotic adaptive tasks.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a new approach called "Reflection on Search Trees" (RoT) that aims to enhance the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating reflection on search trees during the training and inference process.
The key idea behind RoT is to enable LLMs to learn from the process of searching through decision trees, which are a common way to represent and solve complex problems. By reflecting on this search process, the LLM can potentially gain a better understanding of how to break down problems, consider different options, and make more informed decisions.
The RoT framework consists of several components:
- Search Tree Generation: The system generates a search tree for a given task or problem, representing the different options and possible paths to a solution.
- Search Tree Encoding: The search tree is encoded into a format that can be ingested by the LLM, such as a sequence of node representations or a graph-like structure.
- Reflection Module: The LLM is trained with a "reflection" module that learns to reason about the search tree and its properties, such as the structure, decision points, and outcomes.
- Integrated Inference: During inference, the LLM can draw on its reflective capabilities to improve its problem-solving and decision-making, leveraging the insights gained from the search tree.
The paper presents several experiments evaluating the RoT approach on various tasks, including language model-based reasoning, robotic planning, and general intelligence benchmarks. The results show that incorporating RoT can lead to significant improvements in the LLM's reasoning, planning, and problem-solving abilities compared to a standard LLM approach.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a novel and promising approach for enhancing the capabilities of large language models, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research.
One potential limitation is the computational overhead associated with the RoT framework. Generating, encoding, and reflecting on search trees can add significant complexity and computational requirements to the training and inference process. The authors discuss strategies to mitigate this, such as using approximate or partial search trees, but more work may be needed to optimize the efficiency of the RoT approach.
Another area for further research is the generalization of the RoT approach. While the experiments demonstrate improvements on specific tasks, it remains to be seen how well the RoT-enhanced LLM can transfer its capabilities to a wider range of problems and domains. The authors suggest exploring ways to make the RoT module more flexible and adaptable, potentially drawing inspiration from approaches that aim to distill self-evaluation capabilities in LLMs.
Additionally, the paper does not thoroughly explore the potential biases or limitations that may arise from the RoT approach. For example, the way the search trees are generated and encoded could introduce systematic biases or blind spots in the LLM's reasoning. Further research is needed to understand the potential pitfalls and mitigate any unintended consequences.
Overall, the RoT framework represents a valuable contribution to the field of large language model enhancement and demonstrates the potential benefits of incorporating more explicit reasoning capabilities into these powerful AI systems.
Conclusion
The paper introduces a novel approach called "Reflection on Search Trees" (RoT) that aims to enhance the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) by incorporating reflection on search trees during the training and inference process. The key idea is to enable LLMs to learn from the process of searching through decision trees, leading to improved reasoning, planning, and problem-solving abilities.
The RoT framework includes components for generating and encoding search trees, as well as a reflection module that allows the LLM to reason about the search process. Experiments demonstrate that incorporating RoT can lead to significant improvements in the LLM's performance on tasks such as language model-based reasoning, robotic planning, and general intelligence benchmarks.
While the RoT approach shows promise, the paper also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research, such as the computational overhead, the need for improved generalization, and the potential for introducing biases or blind spots. Addressing these challenges could further enhance the capabilities of large language models and expand their applications in a wide range of domains, from supporting robotic adaptive tasks to helping smaller language models assist larger ones.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
On the Empirical Complexity of Reasoning and Planning in LLMs
Liwei Kang, Zirui Zhao, David Hsu, Wee Sun Lee
0
0
Chain-of-thought (CoT), tree-of-thought (ToT), and related techniques work surprisingly well in practice for some complex reasoning tasks with Large Language Models (LLMs), but why? This work seeks the underlying reasons by conducting experimental case studies and linking the performance benefits to well-established sample and computational complexity principles in machine learning. We experimented with 6 reasoning tasks, ranging from grade school math, air travel planning, ..., to Blocksworld. The results suggest that (i) both CoT and ToT benefit significantly from task decomposition, which breaks a complex reasoning task into a sequence of steps with low sample complexity and explicitly outlines the reasoning structure, and (ii) for computationally hard reasoning tasks, the more sophisticated tree structure of ToT outperforms the linear structure of CoT. These findings provide useful guidelines for the use of LLM in solving reasoning tasks in practice.
6/19/2024
📊
Empowering Multi-step Reasoning across Languages via Tree-of-Thoughts
Leonardo Ranaldi, Giulia Pucci, Federico Ranaldi, Elena Sofia Ruzzetti, Fabio Massimo Zanzotto
0
0
Reasoning methods, best exemplified by the well-known Chain-of-Thought (CoT), empower the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by eliciting them to solve complex tasks in a step-by-step manner. Although they are achieving significant success, the ability to deliver multi-step reasoning remains limited to English because of the imbalance in the distribution of pre-training data, which makes other languages a barrier. In this paper, we propose Cross-lingual Tree-of-Thoughts (Cross-ToT), a method for aligning Cross-lingual CoT reasoning across languages. The proposed method, through a self-consistent cross-lingual prompting mechanism inspired by the Tree-of-Thoughts approach, provides multi-step reasoning paths in different languages that, during the steps, lead to the final solution. Experimental evaluations show that our method significantly outperforms existing prompting methods by reducing the number of interactions and achieving state-of-the-art performance.
6/24/2024
LLM-BT: Performing Robotic Adaptive Tasks based on Large Language Models and Behavior Trees
Haotian Zhou, Yunhan Lin, Longwu Yan, Jihong Zhu, Huasong Min
0
0
Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely utilized to perform complex robotic tasks. However, handling external disturbances during tasks is still an open challenge. This paper proposes a novel method to achieve robotic adaptive tasks based on LLMs and Behavior Trees (BTs). It utilizes ChatGPT to reason the descriptive steps of tasks. In order to enable ChatGPT to understand the environment, semantic maps are constructed by an object recognition algorithm. Then, we design a Parser module based on Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) to parse these steps into initial BTs. Subsequently, a BTs Update algorithm is proposed to expand the initial BTs dynamically to control robots to perform adaptive tasks. Different from other LLM-based methods for complex robotic tasks, our method outputs variable BTs that can add and execute new actions according to environmental changes, which is robust to external disturbances. Our method is validated with simulation in different practical scenarios.
4/9/2024
💬
METAREFLECTION: Learning Instructions for Language Agents using Past Reflections
Priyanshu Gupta, Shashank Kirtania, Ananya Singha, Sumit Gulwani, Arjun Radhakrishna, Sherry Shi, Gustavo Soares
0
0
Despite the popularity of Large Language Models (LLMs), crafting specific prompts for LLMs to perform particular tasks remains challenging. Users often engage in multiple conversational turns with an LLM-based agent to accomplish their intended task. Recent studies have demonstrated that linguistic feedback, in the form of self-reflections generated by the model, can work as reinforcement during these conversations, thus enabling quicker convergence to the desired outcome. Motivated by these findings, we introduce METAREFLECTION, a novel technique that learns general prompt instructions for a specific domain from individual self-reflections gathered during a training phase. We evaluate our technique in two domains: Infrastructure as Code (IAC) vulnerability detection and question-answering (QA) using REACT and COT. Our results demonstrate a notable improvement, with METARELECTION outperforming GPT-4 by 16.82% (IAC), 31.33% (COT), and 15.42% (REACT), underscoring the potential of METAREFLECTION as a viable method for enhancing the efficiency of LLMs.
5/24/2024