Scaling Laws and Compute-Optimal Training Beyond Fixed Training Durations
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores scaling laws and compute-optimal training for large language models (LLMs) beyond fixed training durations.
- It proposes an approach called "compute-optimal training" that aims to find the optimal amount of compute to use during training.
- The researchers investigate the relationship between compute, training duration, and model performance, with the goal of improving the efficiency and effectiveness of LLM training.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this paper looked at how the performance of large language models (LLMs) changes as you give them more computing power and train them for longer periods of time. They wanted to find the most efficient way to train these models - the "sweet spot" where you're getting the best performance without wasting a lot of extra compute.
Normally, LLMs are trained for a fixed duration, but the researchers proposed a new approach called "compute-optimal training." This tries to dynamically adjust the training duration based on how the model is performing, to find the point where adding more compute stops yielding significant improvements.
The key insight is that there's often a point of diminishing returns where throwing more compute at a model doesn't lead to much better performance. The researchers wanted to identify this point to make training more efficient and effective. This could save a lot of time and money, which is especially important as LLMs continue to grow in size and complexity.
Technical Explanation
The paper builds on previous research on scaling laws and neural scaling laws that have explored the relationships between model size, compute, and performance. However, it goes beyond fixed training durations to investigate compute-optimal training.
The key innovation is an approach that dynamically adjusts the training duration based on a model's performance during training. This is in contrast to the more common practice of training for a fixed duration. The researchers hypothesize that there is an "optimal" amount of compute that should be used for training, beyond which additional compute provides diminishing returns.
To test this, they trained large language models using a cosine learning rate schedule, which has been shown to be effective for LLMs in prior work (Scaling Laws and Compute-Optimal Training Beyond Fixed Training Durations). They then measured model performance at different training durations and compute budgets to explore the relationship between these variables.
The insights from this analysis inform the proposed "compute-optimal training" approach, which aims to automatically determine the point at which additional compute no longer significantly improves model performance. This could lead to more efficient use of computational resources during LLM training.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the importance of going beyond fixed training durations and exploring compute-optimal training for large language models. The researchers provide a thorough analysis of the relationships between compute, training duration, and model performance.
However, a potential limitation is that the experiments were conducted on a single task (language modeling) and may not generalize to other types of models or tasks. Additionally, the compute-optimal training approach relies on accurately measuring performance improvements during training, which could be challenging in practice.
Another area for further research is the potential interaction between model architecture, training data, and the compute-optimal training approach. It's possible that different model types or training datasets could exhibit different scaling behaviors that would require tailored approaches.
Overall, this paper makes a valuable contribution to the understanding of scaling laws and efficient training of large language models. The compute-optimal training concept is a promising direction for improving the cost-effectiveness and performance of these powerful AI systems.
Conclusion
This paper presents an important step forward in understanding the relationships between compute, training duration, and the performance of large language models. The proposed compute-optimal training approach aims to find the sweet spot where additional compute no longer provides significant improvements, potentially leading to more efficient use of computational resources.
While the research is focused on language modeling, the insights and techniques could have broader implications for the training of large-scale AI models across various domains. As these models continue to grow in size and complexity, finding ways to optimize their training process will be crucial for making progress in the field of artificial intelligence.
The concepts and findings discussed in this paper provide a foundation for further research and exploration in the areas of scaling laws and compute-optimal training for large language models and beyond.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Scaling Laws and Compute-Optimal Training Beyond Fixed Training Durations
Alexander Hagele, Elie Bakouch, Atli Kosson, Loubna Ben Allal, Leandro Von Werra, Martin Jaggi
Scale has become a main ingredient in obtaining strong machine learning models. As a result, understanding a model's scaling properties is key to effectively designing both the right training setup as well as future generations of architectures. In this work, we argue that scale and training research has been needlessly complex due to reliance on the cosine schedule, which prevents training across different lengths for the same model size. We investigate the training behavior of a direct alternative - constant learning rate and cooldowns - and find that it scales predictably and reliably similar to cosine. Additionally, we show that stochastic weight averaging yields improved performance along the training trajectory, without additional training costs, across different scales. Importantly, with these findings we demonstrate that scaling experiments can be performed with significantly reduced compute and GPU hours by utilizing fewer but reusable training runs. Our code is available at https://github.com/epfml/schedules-and-scaling.
Read more5/30/2024
📈
0
Navigating Scaling Laws: Compute Optimality in Adaptive Model Training
Sotiris Anagnostidis, Gregor Bachmann, Imanol Schlag, Thomas Hofmann
In recent years, the state-of-the-art in deep learning has been dominated by very large models that have been pre-trained on vast amounts of data. The paradigm is very simple: investing more computational resources (optimally) leads to better performance, and even predictably so; neural scaling laws have been derived that accurately forecast the performance of a network for a desired level of compute. This leads to the notion of a `compute-optimal' model, i.e. a model that allocates a given level of compute during training optimally to maximize performance. In this work, we extend the concept of optimality by allowing for an `adaptive' model, i.e. a model that can change its shape during training. By doing so, we can design adaptive models that optimally traverse between the underlying scaling laws and outpace their `static' counterparts, leading to a significant reduction in the required compute to reach a given target performance. We show that our approach generalizes across modalities and different shape parameters.
Read more5/24/2024
0
Unraveling the Mystery of Scaling Laws: Part I
Hui Su, Zhi Tian, Xiaoyu Shen, Xunliang Cai
Scaling law principles indicate a power-law correlation between loss and variables such as model size, dataset size, and computational resources utilized during training. These principles play a vital role in optimizing various aspects of model pre-training, ultimately contributing to the success of large language models such as GPT-4, Llama and Gemini. However, the original scaling law paper by OpenAI did not disclose the complete details necessary to derive the precise scaling law formulas, and their conclusions are only based on models containing up to 1.5 billion parameters. Though some subsequent works attempt to unveil these details and scale to larger models, they often neglect the training dependency of important factors such as the learning rate, context length and batch size, leading to their failure to establish a reliable formula for predicting the test loss trajectory. In this technical report, we confirm that the scaling law formulations proposed in the original OpenAI paper remain valid when scaling the model size up to 33 billion, but the constant coefficients in these formulas vary significantly with the experiment setup. We meticulously identify influential factors and provide transparent, step-by-step instructions to estimate all constant terms in scaling-law formulas by training on models with only 1M~60M parameters. Using these estimated formulas, we showcase the capability to accurately predict various attributes for models with up to 33B parameters before their training, including (1) the minimum possible test loss; (2) the minimum required training steps and processed tokens to achieve a specific loss; (3) the critical batch size with an optimal time/computation trade-off at any loss value; and (4) the complete test loss trajectory with arbitrary batch size.
Read more4/8/2024
0
Resolving Discrepancies in Compute-Optimal Scaling of Language Models
Tomer Porian, Mitchell Wortsman, Jenia Jitsev, Ludwig Schmidt, Yair Carmon
Kaplan et al. and Hoffmann et al. developed influential scaling laws for the optimal model size as a function of the compute budget, but these laws yield substantially different predictions. We explain the discrepancy by reproducing the Kaplan scaling law on two datasets (OpenWebText2 and RefinedWeb) and identifying three factors causing the difference: last layer computational cost, warmup duration, and scale-dependent optimizer tuning. With these factors corrected, we obtain excellent agreement with the Hoffmann et al. (i.e., Chinchilla) scaling law. Counter to a hypothesis of Hoffmann et al., we find that careful learning rate decay is not essential for the validity of their scaling law. As a secondary result, we derive scaling laws for the optimal learning rate and batch size, finding that tuning the AdamW $beta_2$ parameter is essential at lower batch sizes.
Read more7/26/2024