Self-Supervised Vision Transformers for Writer Retrieval

Read original: arXiv:2409.00751 - Published 9/4/2024 by Tim Raven, Arthur Matei, Gernot A. Fink
Total Score

0

Self-Supervised Vision Transformers for Writer Retrieval

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • The paper presents a self-supervised approach for writer retrieval using Vision Transformers (ViTs).
  • The method leverages self-supervised pre-training on large-scale image datasets to learn robust visual features for writer identification.
  • Experiments show the proposed approach outperforms state-of-the-art methods on multiple historical document datasets.

Plain English Explanation

The paper discusses a new way to identify the writer of a historical document based on the visual appearance of the handwriting. The key idea is to use a type of machine learning model called a Vision Transformer (ViT) that has been pre-trained on a large collection of general images. This pre-training allows the ViT to learn visual features that are useful for extracting texture and other information from the document images, which can then be used to match the writing style to a specific writer.

The authors show that this self-supervised approach outperforms other state-of-the-art methods for writer identification on several historical document datasets. This suggests the ViT is able to capture meaningful visual features from the handwriting that are generalizable across different writers and documents.

Technical Explanation

The paper proposes a self-supervised learning framework for writer retrieval using Vision Transformers (ViTs). The key contributions are:

  1. Self-Supervised Pre-Training: The authors pre-train the ViT model on a large-scale image dataset (e.g. ImageNet) using a self-supervised contrastive learning objective. This allows the model to learn robust visual representations without requiring manual annotation of the historical document images.

  2. Writer Retrieval Fine-Tuning: After pre-training, the ViT is fine-tuned on the writer retrieval task using labeled historical document images. The model learns to map the visual features of the handwriting to the identity of the writer.

  3. Experiments: The authors evaluate their approach on multiple historical document datasets and show it outperforms state-of-the-art methods for writer retrieval. They also conduct ablation studies to analyze the impact of the self-supervised pre-training.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and promising approach for writer retrieval using self-supervised Vision Transformers. The key strength is leveraging general visual knowledge from pre-training to improve performance on the specific task of writer identification.

However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or caveats of the approach. For example, it's unclear how the method would scale to larger datasets with more writers, or how robust the performance would be to variations in writing styles, document quality, or other real-world challenges.

Additionally, the authors do not compare their approach to alternatives that use different self-supervised learning techniques or architectural choices. A more comprehensive comparison to the state-of-the-art would help contextualize the contributions of this work.

Overall, the research is a valuable contribution, but further analysis of the method's limitations and comparisons to other approaches would strengthen the paper.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a self-supervised learning framework for writer retrieval using Vision Transformers. By pre-training the ViT on large-scale image datasets and fine-tuning on historical document data, the approach is able to outperform state-of-the-art methods for identifying the writer of a document based on the visual appearance of the handwriting.

The key innovation is leveraging general visual knowledge learned through self-supervised pre-training to improve performance on the specific task of writer identification. This suggests ViTs can be a powerful tool for historical document analysis and other applications that require extracting meaningful information from visual data.

While the paper demonstrates the effectiveness of this approach, further research is needed to fully understand its limitations and compare it to alternative methods. Nevertheless, this work represents an important step forward in using self-supervised vision transformers for challenging document analysis tasks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Self-Supervised Vision Transformers for Writer Retrieval
Total Score

0

Self-Supervised Vision Transformers for Writer Retrieval

Tim Raven, Arthur Matei, Gernot A. Fink

While methods based on Vision Transformers (ViT) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in many domains, they have not yet been applied successfully in the domain of writer retrieval. The field is dominated by methods using handcrafted features or features extracted from Convolutional Neural Networks. In this work, we bridge this gap and present a novel method that extracts features from a ViT and aggregates them using VLAD encoding. The model is trained in a self-supervised fashion without any need for labels. We show that extracting local foreground features is superior to using the ViT's class token in the context of writer retrieval. We evaluate our method on two historical document collections. We set a new state-at-of-art performance on the Historical-WI dataset (83.1% mAP), and the HisIR19 dataset (95.0% mAP). Additionally, we demonstrate that our ViT feature extractor can be directly applied to modern datasets such as the CVL database (98.6% mAP) without any fine-tuning.

Read more

9/4/2024

HTR-VT: Handwritten Text Recognition with Vision Transformer
Total Score

0

HTR-VT: Handwritten Text Recognition with Vision Transformer

Yuting Li, Dexiong Chen, Tinglong Tang, Xi Shen

We explore the application of Vision Transformer (ViT) for handwritten text recognition. The limited availability of labeled data in this domain poses challenges for achieving high performance solely relying on ViT. Previous transformer-based models required external data or extensive pre-training on large datasets to excel. To address this limitation, we introduce a data-efficient ViT method that uses only the encoder of the standard transformer. We find that incorporating a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) for feature extraction instead of the original patch embedding and employ Sharpness-Aware Minimization (SAM) optimizer to ensure that the model can converge towards flatter minima and yield notable enhancements. Furthermore, our introduction of the span mask technique, which masks interconnected features in the feature map, acts as an effective regularizer. Empirically, our approach competes favorably with traditional CNN-based models on small datasets like IAM and READ2016. Additionally, it establishes a new benchmark on the LAM dataset, currently the largest dataset with 19,830 training text lines. The code is publicly available at: https://github.com/YutingLi0606/HTR-VT.

Read more

9/16/2024

👀

Total Score

15

Vision Transformers Need Registers

Timoth'ee Darcet, Maxime Oquab, Julien Mairal, Piotr Bojanowski

Transformers have recently emerged as a powerful tool for learning visual representations. In this paper, we identify and characterize artifacts in feature maps of both supervised and self-supervised ViT networks. The artifacts correspond to high-norm tokens appearing during inference primarily in low-informative background areas of images, that are repurposed for internal computations. We propose a simple yet effective solution based on providing additional tokens to the input sequence of the Vision Transformer to fill that role. We show that this solution fixes that problem entirely for both supervised and self-supervised models, sets a new state of the art for self-supervised visual models on dense visual prediction tasks, enables object discovery methods with larger models, and most importantly leads to smoother feature maps and attention maps for downstream visual processing.

Read more

4/15/2024

A Comparative Survey of Vision Transformers for Feature Extraction in Texture Analysis
Total Score

0

A Comparative Survey of Vision Transformers for Feature Extraction in Texture Analysis

Leonardo Scabini, Andre Sacilotti, Kallil M. Zielinski, Lucas C. Ribas, Bernard De Baets, Odemir M. Bruno

Texture, a significant visual attribute in images, has been extensively investigated across various image recognition applications. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), which have been successful in many computer vision tasks, are currently among the best texture analysis approaches. On the other hand, Vision Transformers (ViTs) have been surpassing the performance of CNNs on tasks such as object recognition, causing a paradigm shift in the field. However, ViTs have so far not been scrutinized for texture recognition, hindering a proper appreciation of their potential in this specific setting. For this reason, this work explores various pre-trained ViT architectures when transferred to tasks that rely on textures. We review 21 different ViT variants and perform an extensive evaluation and comparison with CNNs and hand-engineered models on several tasks, such as assessing robustness to changes in texture rotation, scale, and illumination, and distinguishing color textures, material textures, and texture attributes. The goal is to understand the potential and differences among these models when directly applied to texture recognition, using pre-trained ViTs primarily for feature extraction and employing linear classifiers for evaluation. We also evaluate their efficiency, which is one of the main drawbacks in contrast to other methods. Our results show that ViTs generally outperform both CNNs and hand-engineered models, especially when using stronger pre-training and tasks involving in-the-wild textures (images from the internet). We highlight the following promising models: ViT-B with DINO pre-training, BeiTv2, and the Swin architecture, as well as the EfficientFormer as a low-cost alternative. In terms of efficiency, although having a higher number of GFLOPs and parameters, ViT-B and BeiT(v2) can achieve a lower feature extraction time on GPUs compared to ResNet50.

Read more

6/11/2024