Social Bias in Large Language Models For Bangla: An Empirical Study on Gender and Religious Bias
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper examines social biases, specifically gender and religious biases, in large language models for the Bangla language.
- It uses a novel dataset to measure biases and provides insights into the nature and extent of these biases.
- The findings offer important implications for the development and deployment of language models in Bangla-speaking regions.
Plain English Explanation
The researchers in this study looked at the problem of bias in large language models, which are powerful AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. They focused on biases related to gender and religion in models that work with the Bangla language, which is spoken in Bangladesh and parts of India.
To measure these biases, the researchers created a new dataset that included a variety of Bangla text. They then tested how the language models responded to this data, looking for patterns that revealed biases. For example, they might have seen the models associating certain occupations more strongly with one gender or making assumptions about a person's religion based on their name.
By conducting this analysis, the researchers were able to get a better understanding of the nature and extent of these biases in Bangla language models. This is an important finding because these biases can lead to unfair or inaccurate outcomes when the models are used in real-world applications, such as generating text or answering questions.
The researchers' work provides valuable insights that can help developers and researchers better understand and address these biases, ultimately leading to more equitable and inclusive language models.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents an empirical study on gender and religious biases in large language models for the Bangla language. The researchers developed a novel dataset, called BanglaBias, which includes a diverse range of Bangla text covering various topics. This dataset was used to measure the biases present in several state-of-the-art Bangla language models.
The study employed a range of bias evaluation metrics, such as the Stereotyping Index and the Relative Norm Distance, to quantify the gender and religious biases exhibited by the language models. The researchers found that the models displayed significant biases, with stronger associations between certain occupations and gender, as well as between names and religious affiliations.
Through detailed analyses, the paper provides insights into the nature and extent of these biases. For example, the models were more likely to associate male names with leadership roles and female names with caregiver roles. Similarly, the models exhibited biases in their responses to names typically associated with different religious groups.
The findings of this study have important implications for the development and deployment of language models in Bangla-speaking regions. The researchers emphasize the need for proactive measures to address these biases, such as the use of debiasing techniques and the development of more inclusive training datasets.
Critical Analysis
The study provides a comprehensive and rigorous examination of gender and religious biases in Bangla language models, offering valuable insights for the research community. The use of a novel dataset and a range of bias evaluation metrics strengthens the reliability and generalizability of the findings.
However, the paper does not delve into the potential causes of these biases, such as the composition of the training data or the underlying architectural choices of the language models. Exploring these factors could have provided a deeper understanding of the biases and informed more targeted approaches to mitigate them.
Additionally, the paper does not discuss the potential societal impact of these biases, nor does it suggest specific interventions or guidelines for developers to address them. Expanding on these aspects could have further enhanced the practical relevance and impact of the research.
Future studies could investigate the generalizability of the findings to other language models and domains, as well as explore the effectiveness of debiasing techniques in the context of Bangla language models. Interdisciplinary collaborations with social scientists and domain experts could also provide valuable insights into the complex interplay between language models and societal biases.
Conclusion
This study offers a compelling examination of gender and religious biases in large Bangla language models. The findings highlight the significant biases present in these models and underscore the importance of addressing such issues for the responsible development and deployment of AI systems in Bangla-speaking regions.
The insights gained from this research can inform the efforts of developers, researchers, and policymakers to create more equitable and inclusive language models, ultimately contributing to the broader goal of ensuring the fair and ethical use of AI technologies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Social Bias in Large Language Models For Bangla: An Empirical Study on Gender and Religious Bias
Jayanta Sadhu, Maneesha Rani Saha, Rifat Shahriyar
The rapid growth of Large Language Models (LLMs) has put forward the study of biases as a crucial field. It is important to assess the influence of different types of biases embedded in LLMs to ensure fair use in sensitive fields. Although there have been extensive works on bias assessment in English, such efforts are rare and scarce for a major language like Bangla. In this work, we examine two types of social biases in LLM generated outputs for Bangla language. Our main contributions in this work are: (1) bias studies on two different social biases for Bangla (2) a curated dataset for bias measurement benchmarking (3) two different probing techniques for bias detection in the context of Bangla. This is the first work of such kind involving bias assessment of LLMs for Bangla to the best of our knowledge. All our code and resources are publicly available for the progress of bias related research in Bangla NLP.
Read more7/8/2024
0
Exploring Bengali Religious Dialect Biases in Large Language Models with Evaluation Perspectives
Azmine Toushik Wasi, Raima Islam, Mst Rafia Islam, Taki Hasan Rafi, Dong-Kyu Chae
While Large Language Models (LLM) have created a massive technological impact in the past decade, allowing for human-enabled applications, they can produce output that contains stereotypes and biases, especially when using low-resource languages. This can be of great ethical concern when dealing with sensitive topics such as religion. As a means toward making LLMS more fair, we explore bias from a religious perspective in Bengali, focusing specifically on two main religious dialects: Hindu and Muslim-majority dialects. Here, we perform different experiments and audit showing the comparative analysis of different sentences using three commonly used LLMs: ChatGPT, Gemini, and Microsoft Copilot, pertaining to the Hindu and Muslim dialects of specific words and showcasing which ones catch the social biases and which do not. Furthermore, we analyze our findings and relate them to potential reasons and evaluation perspectives, considering their global impact with over 300 million speakers worldwide. With this work, we hope to establish the rigor for creating more fairness in LLMs, as these are widely used as creative writing agents.
Read more7/29/2024
0
An Empirical Study of Gendered Stereotypes in Emotional Attributes for Bangla in Multilingual Large Language Models
Jayanta Sadhu, Maneesha Rani Saha, Rifat Shahriyar
The influence of Large Language Models (LLMs) is rapidly growing, automating more jobs over time. Assessing the fairness of LLMs is crucial due to their expanding impact. Studies reveal the reflection of societal norms and biases in LLMs, which creates a risk of propagating societal stereotypes in downstream tasks. Many studies on bias in LLMs focus on gender bias in various NLP applications. However, there's a gap in research on bias in emotional attributes, despite the close societal link between emotion and gender. This gap is even larger for low-resource languages like Bangla. Historically, women are associated with emotions like empathy, fear, and guilt, while men are linked to anger, bravado, and authority. This pattern reflects societal norms in Bangla-speaking regions. We offer the first thorough investigation of gendered emotion attribution in Bangla for both closed and open source LLMs in this work. Our aim is to elucidate the intricate societal relationship between gender and emotion specifically within the context of Bangla. We have been successful in showing the existence of gender bias in the context of emotions in Bangla through analytical methods and also show how emotion attribution changes on the basis of gendered role selection in LLMs. All of our resources including code and data are made publicly available to support future research on Bangla NLP. Warning: This paper contains explicit stereotypical statements that many may find offensive.
Read more7/10/2024
💬
0
Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Isabel O. Gallegos, Ryan A. Rossi, Joe Barrow, Md Mehrab Tanjim, Sungchul Kim, Franck Dernoncourt, Tong Yu, Ruiyi Zhang, Nesreen K. Ahmed
Rapid advancements of large language models (LLMs) have enabled the processing, understanding, and generation of human-like text, with increasing integration into systems that touch our social sphere. Despite this success, these models can learn, perpetuate, and amplify harmful social biases. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of bias evaluation and mitigation techniques for LLMs. We first consolidate, formalize, and expand notions of social bias and fairness in natural language processing, defining distinct facets of harm and introducing several desiderata to operationalize fairness for LLMs. We then unify the literature by proposing three intuitive taxonomies, two for bias evaluation, namely metrics and datasets, and one for mitigation. Our first taxonomy of metrics for bias evaluation disambiguates the relationship between metrics and evaluation datasets, and organizes metrics by the different levels at which they operate in a model: embeddings, probabilities, and generated text. Our second taxonomy of datasets for bias evaluation categorizes datasets by their structure as counterfactual inputs or prompts, and identifies the targeted harms and social groups; we also release a consolidation of publicly-available datasets for improved access. Our third taxonomy of techniques for bias mitigation classifies methods by their intervention during pre-processing, in-training, intra-processing, and post-processing, with granular subcategories that elucidate research trends. Finally, we identify open problems and challenges for future work. Synthesizing a wide range of recent research, we aim to provide a clear guide of the existing literature that empowers researchers and practitioners to better understand and prevent the propagation of bias in LLMs.
Read more7/16/2024