On Training Data Influence of GPT Models
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the influence of the training data used to create GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) language models.
- The researchers investigate how the characteristics of the training data, such as its size, content, and diversity, can impact the performance and behavior of GPT models.
- The paper explores potential biases and limitations that may arise in GPT models due to the nature of their training data.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models like GPT have become incredibly powerful at tasks like generating human-like text. However, the training data used to create these models can have a significant influence on their performance and behavior. This paper explores how the size, content, and diversity of the training data can lead to biases and limitations in GPT models.
The researchers looked at how changing the training data affected the models' abilities to complete various tasks, as well as the types of biases and errors that emerged. For example, if the training data was heavily skewed towards a particular topic or style of writing, the GPT model might struggle with tasks outside of that domain or show signs of that bias in its own generated text.
By understanding these training data influences, the researchers hope to provide insights that can help developers build more robust and reliable language models in the future. This is an important issue as these models become increasingly prevalent in applications like text generation, mathematical reasoning, and content creation.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by providing an overview of GPT language models and the role that training data plays in their development. The researchers then describe their experimental setup, which involved training GPT models on datasets of varying size, content, and diversity, and evaluating the models' performance on a range of tasks.
The results of their experiments showed that the characteristics of the training data had a significant impact on the GPT models' capabilities. For example, models trained on larger datasets tended to perform better on a wider range of tasks, while models trained on more specialized data exhibited higher performance on related tasks but struggled in other areas.
The researchers also observed that the diversity of the training data was an important factor, as models trained on more diverse corpora were less prone to exhibiting biases or making mistakes that were heavily influenced by the specific content of the training data.
To further explore these findings, the paper includes a geographic diversity analysis that examines how the geographic distribution of the training data can affect the performance and biases of the resulting GPT models.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides a thorough and well-designed study on the influence of training data on GPT models. The researchers have done a commendable job of carefully controlling their experiments and analyzing the results to draw meaningful insights.
However, one potential limitation of the study is that it focuses primarily on the quantitative performance of the models, without delving too deeply into the qualitative aspects of the biases and errors that emerged. It would be interesting to see a more in-depth exploration of the specific types of biases and errors that were observed, as well as how they might manifest in real-world applications.
Additionally, while the researchers acknowledge the importance of training data diversity, they don't provide much guidance on how to effectively measure or achieve diversity in practice. Further research in this area could be valuable for developers looking to build more robust and unbiased language models.
Conclusion
This paper offers important insights into the ways that the training data used to create GPT language models can influence their performance and behavior. By carefully examining the impact of dataset size, content, and diversity, the researchers have provided a valuable contribution to our understanding of how these models work and the factors that can lead to biases and limitations.
As GPT and other large language models continue to become more prevalent in a wide range of applications, this research highlights the need for careful consideration of the training data used to develop these powerful AI systems. By addressing these issues, we can work towards building more reliable and trustworthy language models that can be deployed with confidence in real-world scenarios.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
On Training Data Influence of GPT Models
Qingyi Liu, Yekun Chai, Shuohuan Wang, Yu Sun, Qiwei Peng, Keze Wang, Hua Wu
Amidst the rapid advancements in generative language models, the investigation of how training data shapes the performance of GPT models is still emerging. This paper presents GPTfluence, a novel approach that leverages a featurized simulation to assess the impact of training examples on the training dynamics of GPT models. Our approach not only traces the influence of individual training instances on performance trajectories, such as loss and other key metrics, on targeted test points but also enables a comprehensive comparison with existing methods across various training scenarios in GPT models, ranging from 14 million to 2.8 billion parameters, across a range of downstream tasks. Contrary to earlier methods that struggle with generalization to new data, GPTfluence introduces a parameterized simulation of training dynamics, demonstrating robust generalization capabilities to unseen training data. This adaptability is evident across both fine-tuning and instruction-tuning scenarios, spanning tasks in natural language understanding and generation. We will make our code and data publicly available.
Read more4/17/2024
🏋️
119
The Curse of Recursion: Training on Generated Data Makes Models Forget
Ilia Shumailov, Zakhar Shumaylov, Yiren Zhao, Yarin Gal, Nicolas Papernot, Ross Anderson
Stable Diffusion revolutionised image creation from descriptive text. GPT-2, GPT-3(.5) and GPT-4 demonstrated astonishing performance across a variety of language tasks. ChatGPT introduced such language models to the general public. It is now clear that large language models (LLMs) are here to stay, and will bring about drastic change in the whole ecosystem of online text and images. In this paper we consider what the future might hold. What will happen to GPT-{n} once LLMs contribute much of the language found online? We find that use of model-generated content in training causes irreversible defects in the resulting models, where tails of the original content distribution disappear. We refer to this effect as Model Collapse and show that it can occur in Variational Autoencoders, Gaussian Mixture Models and LLMs. We build theoretical intuition behind the phenomenon and portray its ubiquity amongst all learned generative models. We demonstrate that it has to be taken seriously if we are to sustain the benefits of training from large-scale data scraped from the web. Indeed, the value of data collected about genuine human interactions with systems will be increasingly valuable in the presence of content generated by LLMs in data crawled from the Internet.
Read more4/16/2024
0
Chattronics: using GPTs to assist in the design of data acquisition systems
Jonathan Paul Driemeyer Brown, Tiago Oliveira Weber
The usefulness of Large Language Models (LLM) is being continuously tested in various fields. However, their intrinsic linguistic characteristic is still one of the limiting factors when applying these models to exact sciences. In this article, a novel approach to use General Pre-Trained Transformers to assist in the design phase of data acquisition systems will be presented. The solution is packaged in the form of an application that retains the conversational aspects of LLMs, in such a manner that the user must provide details on the desired project in order for the model to draft both a system-level architectural diagram and the block-level specifications, following a Top-Down methodology based on restrictions. To test this tool, two distinct user emulations were used, one of which uses an additional GPT model. In total, 4 different data acquisition projects were used in the testing phase, each with its own measurement requirements: angular position, temperature, acceleration and a fourth project with both pressure and superficial temperature measurements. After 160 test iterations, the study concludes that there is potential for these models to serve adequately as synthesis/assistant tools for data acquisition systems, but there are still technological limitations. The results show coherent architectures and topologies, but that GPTs have difficulties in simultaneously considering all requirements and many times commits theoretical mistakes.
Read more9/24/2024
0
Is Child-Directed Speech Effective Training Data for Language Models?
Steven Y. Feng, Noah D. Goodman, Michael C. Frank
While high-performing language models are typically trained on hundreds of billions of words, human children become fluent language users with a much smaller amount of data. What are the features of the data they receive, and how do these features support language modeling objectives? To investigate this question, we train GPT-2 models on 29M words of English-language child-directed speech and a new matched, synthetic dataset (TinyDialogues), comparing to a heterogeneous blend of datasets from the BabyLM challenge. We evaluate both the syntactic and semantic knowledge of these models using developmentally-inspired evaluations. Through pretraining experiments, we test whether the global developmental ordering or the local discourse ordering of children's training data support high performance relative to other datasets. The local properties of the data affect model results, but somewhat surprisingly, global properties do not. Further, child language input is not uniquely valuable for training language models. These findings support the hypothesis that, rather than proceeding from better data, children's learning is instead substantially more efficient than current language modeling techniques.
Read more8/9/2024