The Trembling-Hand Problem for LTLf Planning

Overview

• This paper examines the problem of an agent trying to achieve a goal over time, but with the potential for mistakes or imprecision in its actions due to a "trembling hand".
• The authors study this "trembling-hand" problem in the context of reasoning about actions and planning for temporally extended goals expressed in Linear Temporal Logic on finite traces (LTLf).
• The goal is to synthesize a strategy (or plan) that maximizes the probability of satisfying the LTLf goal, despite the agent's potential mistakes.
• The authors consider both deterministic and nondeterministic (adversarial) environments.

Plain English Explanation

Imagine you're trying to complete a task over time, but your hand shakes a little, so you might accidentally do the wrong thing sometimes. This paper looks at how to plan for that situation, specifically when the task is expressed as a temporal logic goal that needs to be achieved.

The key idea is to find a plan (or strategy) that has the best chance of satisfying the goal, even though the agent might make some unintended mistakes along the way due to the "trembling hand" problem. This is important in many real-world situations where agents (like robots or autonomous systems) need to reliably achieve complex goals over time.

The paper considers two different types of environments: deterministic, where the outcomes of actions are known, and nondeterministic (or adversarial), where there's uncertainty or even an adversary trying to interfere. For each case, the authors propose solution techniques using Markov Decision Processes to model the problem and find the best plan.

Technical Explanation

The key technical contribution of this paper is the formulation and solution of the "trembling-hand" problem in the context of reasoning about actions and planning for temporally extended goals expressed in Linear Temporal Logic on finite traces (LTLf).

In this problem, the agent aims to achieve its LTLf goal, but with a certain probability of accidentally performing unintended actions due to faults or imprecision in its action selection mechanism. The authors propose solution techniques for both deterministic and nondeterministic (adversarial) domains.

For the deterministic case, the authors model the problem using a Markov Decision Process (MDP) and provide an algorithm to synthesize an optimal strategy that maximizes the probability of satisfying the LTLf goal.

For the nondeterministic case, the authors introduce Markov Decision Processes with Set-valued Transitions (MDPSTs) to capture both the environmental nondeterminism and the agent's potential action instruction errors. They then present an algorithm to find the optimal strategy in this setting.

The authors formally prove the correctness of their solution techniques and demonstrate their effectiveness through experimental evaluation on a proof-of-concept implementation.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a novel and relevant problem formulation, addressing the practical challenge of achieving temporally extended goals in the face of potential action execution errors. The proposed solutions, based on MDPs and MDPSTs, are technically sound and the experimental results suggest the approaches are effective.

However, the paper does not discuss potential limitations or caveats of the proposed techniques. For example, it is unclear how the methods would scale to larger, more complex problem instances, or how sensitive the solutions are to the specific probability distributions assumed for the "trembling hand" errors.

Additionally, the paper does not compare or contextualize the proposed approaches within the broader literature on planning under uncertainty or temporally extended goal reasoning. Situating the work more firmly within this related research could help readers better understand the novelty and significance of the contributions.

Conclusion

This paper introduces an important problem, the "trembling-hand" problem, in the context of planning for temporally extended goals expressed in LTLf. The authors propose solution techniques based on Markov Decision Processes, both for deterministic and nondeterministic environments, and demonstrate the effectiveness of their approaches through experiments.

The work highlights the practical challenges of reliable goal achievement in the face of potential action execution errors, which is a crucial consideration for many real-world autonomous systems and robotics applications. While the paper presents a solid technical foundation, further research is needed to fully understand the limitations and scaling potential of the proposed methods, as well as to contextualize the contributions within the broader literature on planning under uncertainty and temporal logic reasoning.