We Need Structured Output: Towards User-centered Constraints on Large Language Model Output

Read original: arXiv:2404.07362 - Published 4/12/2024 by Michael Xieyang Liu, Frederick Liu, Alexander J. Fiannaca, Terry Koo, Lucas Dixon, Michael Terry, Carrie J. Cai
Total Score

0

We Need Structured Output: Towards User-centered Constraints on Large Language Model Output

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper discusses the need for "structured output" from large language models (LLMs), where the output is constrained to meet specific user requirements.
  • The authors conducted a survey with industry professionals to understand their perspectives on the challenges and desired features for LLMs in real-world applications.
  • The paper highlights the importance of user-centered constraints on LLM output to ensure the models' usefulness and reliability in practical settings.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) like GPT-3 have shown impressive capabilities in generating human-like text. However, in many real-world applications, the open-ended and unconstrained nature of their output can be problematic. Guiding Large Language Models to Generate Computer and StructBench: Are Large Language Models Really Capable? have highlighted the challenges in using LLMs for tasks that require structured and reliable outputs.

This paper aims to address this issue by exploring the need for "structured output" from LLMs, where the model's output is constrained to meet specific user requirements. The authors conducted a survey with industry professionals to understand their perspectives on the challenges and desired features for LLMs in real-world applications. The survey results reveal that industry professionals want LLMs to produce outputs that are more reliable, consistent, and tailored to their specific needs.

The key insight is that while LLMs can generate impressive text, their unconstrained nature can lead to outputs that are not useful or even potentially harmful in practical settings. By incorporating user-centered constraints on the LLM output, the models can be made more reliable and trustworthy for real-world applications. This aligns with the findings in Large Human Language Models Need Challenges, which emphasizes the importance of developing LLMs that can handle more structured and constrained tasks.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a survey-based study to understand the perspectives of industry professionals on the use of large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications. The authors conducted a survey with 40 participants from various industries, including technology, finance, and healthcare.

The survey aimed to uncover the key challenges and desired features that industry professionals have when considering the use of LLMs. The participants were asked about their experiences with LLMs, the types of tasks they would like to use them for, and the specific requirements they have for the models' outputs.

The survey results revealed that industry professionals are interested in using LLMs for a wide range of tasks, including content generation, data analysis, and customer service. However, they also expressed concerns about the reliability, consistency, and lack of structure in the models' outputs. Many participants emphasized the need for LLMs to produce outputs that are tailored to their specific needs and can be easily integrated into their workflows.

To address these concerns, the authors propose the concept of "structured output" for LLMs, where the models' outputs are constrained to meet user-defined requirements. This could involve, for example, generating text that adheres to a specific format, includes specific information, or aligns with predetermined rules or guidelines.

The findings of this study align with the insights presented in Apprentices to Research Assistants: Advancing Research with Large Language Models and Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better, which emphasize the importance of developing LLMs that can handle more structured and constrained tasks.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides valuable insights into the perspectives of industry professionals on the use of large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications. The survey-based approach allows the authors to gather first-hand feedback from potential users of these models, which is crucial for ensuring the development of LLMs that are truly useful and aligned with practical needs.

One potential limitation of the study is the relatively small sample size of 40 participants. While the authors provide a diverse range of industry backgrounds, a larger sample size could have provided more robust and generalizable insights. Additionally, the paper does not delve into the specific use cases or domains where industry professionals would like to employ LLMs, which could have provided more nuanced understanding of their needs.

The authors' proposal for "structured output" from LLMs is an important step in addressing the challenges identified in the survey. Incorporating user-centered constraints on LLM output could indeed enhance the reliability, consistency, and usefulness of these models in real-world applications. However, the paper does not provide a detailed technical framework or implementation details for how such structured output could be achieved, which could be an area for further research and development.

Overall, this paper highlights the importance of user-centered design and feedback in the development of large language models. By addressing the specific needs and concerns of industry professionals, researchers can work towards creating LLMs that are truly valuable and impactful in practical settings.

Conclusion

This paper emphasizes the need for "structured output" from large language models (LLMs) to better align with the requirements of industry professionals. The survey-based study reveals that while industry professionals are interested in using LLMs, they have concerns about the reliability, consistency, and lack of structure in the models' outputs.

To address these concerns, the authors propose the concept of user-centered constraints on LLM output, where the models' outputs are tailored to specific user requirements. This approach could help ensure that LLMs produce outputs that are more useful, trustworthy, and easily integrated into real-world workflows.

The insights from this paper have important implications for the ongoing development and deployment of large language models. By incorporating user feedback and designing LLMs with practical needs in mind, researchers can work towards creating models that are truly valuable and impactful in a wide range of industries and applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

We Need Structured Output: Towards User-centered Constraints on Large Language Model Output
Total Score

0

We Need Structured Output: Towards User-centered Constraints on Large Language Model Output

Michael Xieyang Liu, Frederick Liu, Alexander J. Fiannaca, Terry Koo, Lucas Dixon, Michael Terry, Carrie J. Cai

Large language models can produce creative and diverse responses. However, to integrate them into current developer workflows, it is essential to constrain their outputs to follow specific formats or standards. In this work, we surveyed 51 experienced industry professionals to understand the range of scenarios and motivations driving the need for output constraints from a user-centered perspective. We identified 134 concrete use cases for constraints at two levels: low-level, which ensures the output adhere to a structured format and an appropriate length, and high-level, which requires the output to follow semantic and stylistic guidelines without hallucination. Critically, applying output constraints could not only streamline the currently repetitive process of developing, testing, and integrating LLM prompts for developers, but also enhance the user experience of LLM-powered features and applications. We conclude with a discussion on user preferences and needs towards articulating intended constraints for LLMs, alongside an initial design for a constraint prototyping tool.

Read more

4/12/2024

Translate-and-Revise: Boosting Large Language Models for Constrained Translation
Total Score

0

Translate-and-Revise: Boosting Large Language Models for Constrained Translation

Pengcheng Huang, Yongyu Mu, Yuzhang Wu, Bei Li, Chunyang Xiao, Tong Xiao, Jingbo Zhu

Imposing constraints on machine translation systems presents a challenging issue because these systems are not trained to make use of constraints in generating adequate, fluent translations. In this paper, we leverage the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) for constrained translation, given that LLMs can easily adapt to this task by taking translation instructions and constraints as prompts. However, LLMs cannot always guarantee the adequacy of translation, and, in some cases, ignore the given constraints. This is in part because LLMs might be overly confident in their predictions, overriding the influence of the constraints. To overcome this overiding behaviour, we propose to add a revision process that encourages LLMs to correct the outputs by prompting them about the constraints that have not yet been met. We evaluate our approach on four constrained translation tasks, encompassing both lexical and structural constraints in multiple constraint domains. Experiments show 15% improvement in constraint-based translation accuracy over standard LLMs and the approach also significantly outperforms neural machine translation (NMT) state-of-the-art methods.

Read more

7/19/2024

💬

Total Score

0

ConCodeEval: Evaluating Large Language Models for Code Constraints in Domain-Specific Languages

Mehant Kammakomati, Sameer Pimparkhede, Srikanth Tamilselvam, Prince Kumar, Pushpak Bhattacharyya

Recent work shows Large Language Models (LLMs) struggle to understand natural language constraints for various text generation tasks in zero- and few-shot settings. While, in the code domain, there is wide usage of constraints in code format to maintain the integrity of code written in Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs) like JSON and YAML which are widely used for system-level programming tasks in enterprises. Given that LLMs are increasingly used for system-level code tasks, evaluating if they can comprehend these code constraints is crucial. However, no work has been done to evaluate their controllability over code constraints. Hence, we introduce ConCodeEval, a first-of-its-kind benchmark having two novel tasks for code constraints across five representations. Our findings suggest that language models struggle with code constraints. Code languages that perform excellently for normal code tasks do not perform well when the same languages represent fine-grained constraints.

Read more

9/2/2024

Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding
Total Score

0

Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding

Lifu Tu, Semih Yavuz, Jin Qu, Jiacheng Xu, Rui Meng, Caiming Xiong, Yingbo Zhou

Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated a powerful ability for text generation. However, achieving optimal results with a given prompt or instruction can be challenging, especially for billion-sized models. Additionally, undesired behaviors such as toxicity or hallucinations can manifest. While much larger models (e.g., ChatGPT) may demonstrate strength in mitigating these issues, there is still no guarantee of complete prevention. In this work, we propose formalizing text generation as a future-constrained generation problem to minimize undesirable behaviors and enforce faithfulness to instructions. The estimation of future constraint satisfaction, accomplished using LLMs, guides the text generation process. Our extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach across three distinct text generation tasks: keyword-constrained generation (Lin et al., 2020), toxicity reduction (Gehman et al., 2020), and factual correctness in question-answering (Gao et al., 2023).

Read more

6/27/2024