Where is the answer? Investigating Positional Bias in Language Model Knowledge Extraction

Overview

• Large language models (LLMs) need to be updated or fine-tuned with new documents to stay current and adapt to new domains.
• A key challenge is memorizing the latest information in a way that it can be easily extracted through a query prompt.
• However, LLMs suffer from a phenomenon called the "perplexity curse," where minimizing document perplexity during fine-tuning does not necessarily lead to effective information extraction via prompts.
• Interestingly, LLMs can accurately answer questions about the first sentence, but struggle to extract information from the middle or end of the documents used for fine-tuning.
• This issue is attributed to the autoregressive training of LLMs, where each token is predicted based on all previous tokens, making it difficult to recall information from specific parts of the training documents.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models, such as GPT-3, are powerful tools for natural language processing, but they need to be regularly updated or fine-tuned with new information to remain relevant and useful. One of the key challenges is finding a way to effectively store and extract the latest knowledge from these models.

In this paper, the researchers discovered an intriguing phenomenon: while LLMs can accurately answer questions about the first sentence of a document, they struggle to extract information from the middle or end of the document, even after fine-tuning on that document. This is because the way LLMs are trained, where each word is predicted based on all the previous words, makes it difficult for them to recall specific details from different parts of the training data.

To better understand this issue, the researchers created synthetic and real-world datasets to evaluate how the position of information within a document affects the model's ability to answer questions about it. Their findings suggest that even large language models suffer from this "perplexity curse," but that techniques like denoising autoregressive loss can help improve the model's ability to extract information from diverse positions within the text.

These insights are important for improving the way knowledge is extracted from LLMs and for understanding the tradeoffs between different approaches to adapting these models to new domains, such as fine-tuning versus other techniques like Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG).

Technical Explanation

The researchers in this study investigate a phenomenon known as the "perplexity curse" in large language models (LLMs). They found that despite minimizing document perplexity during fine-tuning, LLMs struggle to extract information through a query prompt, especially for information located in the middle or end of the documents used for fine-tuning.

To conduct a deeper analysis, the researchers published both synthetic and real-world datasets to evaluate the question-answering (QA) performance of LLMs with respect to the position of the answer within the document. Their investigation revealed that even large language models suffer from the perplexity curse, where the autoregressive training approach (predicting each token based on all previous tokens) hinders the model's ability to recall information from specific parts of the training documents.

The researchers suggest that this issue is caused by the autoregressive nature of LLM training, which makes it difficult for the models to extract information from diverse positions within the training documents. However, they found that regularization techniques, such as denoising autoregressive loss, can help enhance the models' ability to retrieve information from various positions within the text.

These findings have important implications for improving knowledge extraction from LLMs and for understanding the tradeoffs between different approaches to adapting these models to new domains, such as fine-tuning versus Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG).

Critical Analysis

The researchers provide a thoughtful analysis of the challenges faced by large language models in effectively extracting information from the training documents, particularly when the relevant information is located in the middle or end of the text. Their findings highlight the limitations of the autoregressive training approach and suggest that more research is needed to address the "perplexity curse" that plagues these models.

One potential area for further investigation could be exploring alternative training approaches or architectural designs that can better capture and recall information from diverse positions within the training data. Additionally, the researchers could delve deeper into the implications of their findings for real-world applications, such as question-answering systems or knowledge-base construction, and explore ways to mitigate the identified issues.

While the researchers have made a valuable contribution to our understanding of LLM behavior, it is essential to continue challenging and questioning aspects of the research to push the field forward and ensure the development of robust and reliable language models that can effectively extract and utilize knowledge from diverse sources.

Conclusion

This study sheds light on a significant challenge facing large language models: the "perplexity curse" that hinders their ability to effectively extract information from the middle or end of documents used for fine-tuning, despite their strong performance on the first sentence.

The researchers' findings have important implications for improving knowledge extraction from LLMs and understanding the tradeoffs between different approaches to adapting these models to new domains. Their insights suggest that addressing the autoregressive training issue and exploring regularization techniques, such as denoising autoregressive loss, could be promising avenues for enhancing the information extraction capabilities of large language models.

As the field of natural language processing continues to evolve, it is crucial to continue exploring these challenges and pushing the boundaries of what is possible with large language models. The researchers' work contributes valuable knowledge to this ongoing effort and lays the groundwork for future advancements in the field.