Why does Knowledge Distillation Work? Rethink its Attention and Fidelity Mechanism
2405.00739
0
0
๐งช
Abstract
Does Knowledge Distillation (KD) really work? Conventional wisdom viewed it as a knowledge transfer procedure where a perfect mimicry of the student to its teacher is desired. However, paradoxical studies indicate that closely replicating the teacher's behavior does not consistently improve student generalization, posing questions on its possible causes. Confronted with this gap, we hypothesize that diverse attentions in teachers contribute to better student generalization at the expense of reduced fidelity in ensemble KD setups. By increasing data augmentation strengths, our key findings reveal a decrease in the Intersection over Union (IoU) of attentions between teacher models, leading to reduced student overfitting and decreased fidelity. We propose this low-fidelity phenomenon as an underlying characteristic rather than a pathology when training KD. This suggests that stronger data augmentation fosters a broader perspective provided by the divergent teacher ensemble and lower student-teacher mutual information, benefiting generalization performance. These insights clarify the mechanism on low-fidelity phenomenon in KD. Thus, we offer new perspectives on optimizing student model performance, by emphasizing increased diversity in teacher attentions and reduced mimicry behavior between teachers and student.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Knowledge Distillation (KD) is a technique for transferring knowledge from a complex "teacher" model to a simpler "student" model.
- Conventional wisdom viewed KD as a process of perfect mimicry, where the student aims to replicate the teacher's behavior exactly.
- However, some studies have found that closely replicating the teacher does not consistently improve the student's generalization performance, raising questions about the underlying mechanisms.
Plain English Explanation
The paper explores the paradoxical finding that closely copying a teacher model does not always lead to better performance in the student model. The researchers hypothesize that having diverse "attentions" (focus) in the teacher models can actually benefit the student's generalization ability, even if it reduces the fidelity (accuracy) of the student's mimicry.
By increasing the strength of data augmentation techniques, the researchers found that the attentions (focus) of the different teacher models became more divergent (different). This decreased the overlap between the teacher models' attentions, leading to less overfitting and better generalization in the student model.
The researchers propose that this "low-fidelity" phenomenon, where the student doesn't perfectly match the teacher, is actually a desirable characteristic of KD. By having a more diverse set of perspectives from the teacher ensemble, and less direct mimicry, the student model can learn a broader understanding and perform better on new, unseen data.
Technical Explanation
The researchers investigated the underlying mechanisms behind the paradoxical finding that closely replicating a teacher model does not consistently improve student generalization. They hypothesized that diverse attentions (focus) in the teacher models contribute to better student generalization, even at the expense of reduced fidelity (accuracy) in mimicking the teacher.
To test this hypothesis, the researchers increased the strength of data augmentation techniques, which led to a decrease in the Intersection over Union (IoU) of attentions between the teacher models. This reduced overlap in the teacher models' attentions resulted in less overfitting and improved generalization performance in the student model, despite the student exhibiting lower fidelity to the individual teacher models.
The researchers propose that this "low-fidelity" phenomenon, where the student doesn't perfectly match the teacher, is an underlying characteristic rather than a pathology of knowledge distillation. By fostering a broader perspective from the divergent teacher ensemble and reducing the mutual information between the student and teacher, stronger data augmentation can benefit the student's generalization performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper provides valuable insights into the mechanisms underlying knowledge distillation and challenges the conventional wisdom of perfect mimicry as the goal. By highlighting the benefits of diverse teacher attentions and reduced student-teacher fidelity, the researchers offer new perspectives on optimizing student model performance.
However, the paper does not delve into potential limitations or caveats of this approach. For instance, it's unclear how the findings would scale to larger and more complex models, or how the approach would perform in different domains or tasks. Additionally, the researchers could have discussed the potential computational and resource trade-offs of maintaining a diverse ensemble of teacher models.
Further research could explore the optimal balance between teacher diversity and student fidelity, and investigate the generalizability of these findings across a wider range of scenarios. Exploring the application of these insights to other knowledge distillation techniques, such as target-aware transformer-based KD or contrastive KD, could also yield valuable insights.
Conclusion
This paper challenges the conventional wisdom of perfect mimicry as the goal of knowledge distillation. By demonstrating that diverse attentions in teacher models can lead to better student generalization, even at the expense of reduced fidelity, the researchers offer new perspectives on optimizing student model performance.
The insights from this work suggest that fostering a broader perspective through a divergent teacher ensemble and reduced student-teacher mutual information can be beneficial for knowledge distillation. These findings have the potential to inform the development of more effective and robust knowledge distillation techniques, ultimately leading to improved performance of lightweight student models across a variety of applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
๐
Toward Student-Oriented Teacher Network Training For Knowledge Distillation
Chengyu Dong, Liyuan Liu, Jingbo Shang
0
0
How to conduct teacher training for knowledge distillation is still an open problem. It has been widely observed that a best-performing teacher does not necessarily yield the best-performing student, suggesting a fundamental discrepancy between the current teacher training practice and the ideal teacher training strategy. To fill this gap, we explore the feasibility of training a teacher that is oriented toward student performance with empirical risk minimization (ERM). Our analyses are inspired by the recent findings that the effectiveness of knowledge distillation hinges on the teacher's capability to approximate the true label distribution of training inputs. We theoretically establish that the ERM minimizer can approximate the true label distribution of training data as long as the feature extractor of the learner network is Lipschitz continuous and is robust to feature transformations. In light of our theory, we propose a teacher training method SoTeacher which incorporates Lipschitz regularization and consistency regularization into ERM. Experiments on benchmark datasets using various knowledge distillation algorithms and teacher-student pairs confirm that SoTeacher can improve student accuracy consistently.
5/10/2024
Improve Knowledge Distillation via Label Revision and Data Selection
Weichao Lan, Yiu-ming Cheung, Qing Xu, Buhua Liu, Zhikai Hu, Mengke Li, Zhenghua Chen
0
0
Knowledge distillation (KD) has become a widely used technique in the field of model compression, which aims to transfer knowledge from a large teacher model to a lightweight student model for efficient network development. In addition to the supervision of ground truth, the vanilla KD method regards the predictions of the teacher as soft labels to supervise the training of the student model. Based on vanilla KD, various approaches have been developed to further improve the performance of the student model. However, few of these previous methods have considered the reliability of the supervision from teacher models. Supervision from erroneous predictions may mislead the training of the student model. This paper therefore proposes to tackle this problem from two aspects: Label Revision to rectify the incorrect supervision and Data Selection to select appropriate samples for distillation to reduce the impact of erroneous supervision. In the former, we propose to rectify the teacher's inaccurate predictions using the ground truth. In the latter, we introduce a data selection technique to choose suitable training samples to be supervised by the teacher, thereby reducing the impact of incorrect predictions to some extent. Experiment results demonstrate the effectiveness of our proposed method, and show that our method can be combined with other distillation approaches, improving their performance.
4/8/2024
๐ฏ
Tailoring Instructions to Student's Learning Levels Boosts Knowledge Distillation
Yuxin Ren, Zihan Zhong, Xingjian Shi, Yi Zhu, Chun Yuan, Mu Li
0
0
It has been commonly observed that a teacher model with superior performance does not necessarily result in a stronger student, highlighting a discrepancy between current teacher training practices and effective knowledge transfer. In order to enhance the guidance of the teacher training process, we introduce the concept of distillation influence to determine the impact of distillation from each training sample on the student's generalization ability. In this paper, we propose Learning Good Teacher Matters (LGTM), an efficient training technique for incorporating distillation influence into the teacher's learning process. By prioritizing samples that are likely to enhance the student's generalization ability, our LGTM outperforms 10 common knowledge distillation baselines on 6 text classification tasks in the GLUE benchmark.
5/16/2024
Robust Knowledge Distillation Based on Feature Variance Against Backdoored Teacher Model
Jinyin Chen, Xiaoming Zhao, Haibin Zheng, Xiao Li, Sheng Xiang, Haifeng Guo
0
0
Benefiting from well-trained deep neural networks (DNNs), model compression have captured special attention for computing resource limited equipment, especially edge devices. Knowledge distillation (KD) is one of the widely used compression techniques for edge deployment, by obtaining a lightweight student model from a well-trained teacher model released on public platforms. However, it has been empirically noticed that the backdoor in the teacher model will be transferred to the student model during the process of KD. Although numerous KD methods have been proposed, most of them focus on the distillation of a high-performing student model without robustness consideration. Besides, some research adopts KD techniques as effective backdoor mitigation tools, but they fail to perform model compression at the same time. Consequently, it is still an open problem to well achieve two objectives of robust KD, i.e., student model's performance and backdoor mitigation. To address these issues, we propose RobustKD, a robust knowledge distillation that compresses the model while mitigating backdoor based on feature variance. Specifically, RobustKD distinguishes the previous works in three key aspects: (1) effectiveness: by distilling the feature map of the teacher model after detoxification, the main task performance of the student model is comparable to that of the teacher model; (2) robustness: by reducing the characteristic variance between the teacher model and the student model, it mitigates the backdoor of the student model under backdoored teacher model scenario; (3) generic: RobustKD still has good performance in the face of multiple data models (e.g., WRN 28-4, Pyramid-200) and diverse DNNs (e.g., ResNet50, MobileNet).
6/6/2024