Backdoor Attacks and Defenses on Semantic-Symbol Reconstruction in Semantic Communications

Read original: arXiv:2404.13279 - Published 4/23/2024 by Yuan Zhou, Rose Qingyang Hu, Yi Qian
Total Score

0

Backdoor Attacks and Defenses on Semantic-Symbol Reconstruction in Semantic Communications

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper examines backdoor attacks and defenses on semantic-symbol reconstruction in semantic communications.
  • Semantic communications aim to transmit the meaning of information rather than just its raw data, which can be more efficient.
  • Backdoor attacks are a type of malicious attack where the model is trained to misclassify inputs with a specific trigger pattern.
  • The paper investigates the vulnerability of semantic-symbol reconstruction models to backdoor attacks and proposes defense strategies.

Plain English Explanation

Semantic communications is a new way of transmitting information that focuses on conveying the meaning or context, rather than just the raw data. This can be more efficient than traditional communication methods. However, semantic communications models can be vulnerable to backdoor attacks, where the model is secretly trained to misclassify certain inputs with a specific "trigger" pattern.

This paper explores these backdoor attacks on semantic-symbol reconstruction models, which are a key part of semantic communications. The researchers investigate how backdoors can be introduced and how they might be detected and defended against. They propose several defense strategies to make these models more robust to these kinds of malicious attacks.

Overall, the work sheds light on an important security challenge for this emerging communication technology, and offers solutions to help make semantic communications more secure and reliable.

Technical Explanation

The paper begins by describing the system model for semantic-symbol reconstruction, which involves an encoder that maps input data to semantic symbols, and a decoder that reconstructs the original input from those symbols.

The researchers then show how backdoor attacks can be applied to this system. By injecting a specific trigger pattern into a subset of the training data, they are able to induce the model to misclassify those trigger inputs during inference, even if the overall reconstruction performance remains high.

To defend against these attacks, the paper proposes several techniques:

  1. Adversarial training to make the model more robust to trigger patterns during training.
  2. Input purification methods to detect and remove potential trigger patterns at inference time.
  3. Ensemble methods that combine multiple models to improve overall resilience.

The researchers evaluate these defenses on benchmark datasets and find that they can effectively mitigate the impact of backdoor attacks while preserving good semantic reconstruction performance.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a thorough investigation of backdoor attacks on semantic-symbol reconstruction and offers practical defense strategies. However, some caveats and limitations are worth noting:

Further research is needed to assess the robustness of semantic communications against more sophisticated adversarial attacks and to develop efficient, scalable defense mechanisms that can be readily deployed in practical systems.

Conclusion

This paper highlights the vulnerability of semantic-symbol reconstruction models to backdoor attacks and proposes several defense strategies to mitigate this threat. As semantic communications emerge as a promising approach for efficient data transmission, ensuring the security and reliability of these systems is crucial. The insights and techniques presented in this work contribute to the ongoing efforts to build more robust and secure semantic communication frameworks.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Backdoor Attacks and Defenses on Semantic-Symbol Reconstruction in Semantic Communications
Total Score

0

Backdoor Attacks and Defenses on Semantic-Symbol Reconstruction in Semantic Communications

Yuan Zhou, Rose Qingyang Hu, Yi Qian

Semantic communication is of crucial importance for the next-generation wireless communication networks. The existing works have developed semantic communication frameworks based on deep learning. However, systems powered by deep learning are vulnerable to threats such as backdoor attacks and adversarial attacks. This paper delves into backdoor attacks targeting deep learning-enabled semantic communication systems. Since current works on backdoor attacks are not tailored for semantic communication scenarios, a new backdoor attack paradigm on semantic symbols (BASS) is introduced, based on which the corresponding defense measures are designed. Specifically, a training framework is proposed to prevent BASS. Additionally, reverse engineering-based and pruning-based defense strategies are designed to protect against backdoor attacks in semantic communication. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of both the proposed attack paradigm and the defense strategies.

Read more

4/23/2024

An Invisible Backdoor Attack Based On Semantic Feature
Total Score

0

An Invisible Backdoor Attack Based On Semantic Feature

Yangming Chen

Backdoor attacks have severely threatened deep neural network (DNN) models in the past several years. These attacks can occur in almost every stage of the deep learning pipeline. Although the attacked model behaves normally on benign samples, it makes wrong predictions for samples containing triggers. However, most existing attacks use visible patterns (e.g., a patch or image transformations) as triggers, which are vulnerable to human inspection. In this paper, we propose a novel backdoor attack, making imperceptible changes. Concretely, our attack first utilizes the pre-trained victim model to extract low-level and high-level semantic features from clean images and generates trigger pattern associated with high-level features based on channel attention. Then, the encoder model generates poisoned images based on the trigger and extracted low-level semantic features without causing noticeable feature loss. We evaluate our attack on three prominent image classification DNN across three standard datasets. The results demonstrate that our attack achieves high attack success rates while maintaining robustness against backdoor defenses. Furthermore, we conduct extensive image similarity experiments to emphasize the stealthiness of our attack strategy.

Read more

5/21/2024

Breaking the False Sense of Security in Backdoor Defense through Re-Activation Attack
Total Score

0

Breaking the False Sense of Security in Backdoor Defense through Re-Activation Attack

Mingli Zhu, Siyuan Liang, Baoyuan Wu

Deep neural networks face persistent challenges in defending against backdoor attacks, leading to an ongoing battle between attacks and defenses. While existing backdoor defense strategies have shown promising performance on reducing attack success rates, can we confidently claim that the backdoor threat has truly been eliminated from the model? To address it, we re-investigate the characteristics of the backdoored models after defense (denoted as defense models). Surprisingly, we find that the original backdoors still exist in defense models derived from existing post-training defense strategies, and the backdoor existence is measured by a novel metric called backdoor existence coefficient. It implies that the backdoors just lie dormant rather than being eliminated. To further verify this finding, we empirically show that these dormant backdoors can be easily re-activated during inference, by manipulating the original trigger with well-designed tiny perturbation using universal adversarial attack. More practically, we extend our backdoor reactivation to black-box scenario, where the defense model can only be queried by the adversary during inference, and develop two effective methods, i.e., query-based and transfer-based backdoor re-activation attacks. The effectiveness of the proposed methods are verified on both image classification and multimodal contrastive learning (i.e., CLIP) tasks. In conclusion, this work uncovers a critical vulnerability that has never been explored in existing defense strategies, emphasizing the urgency of designing more robust and advanced backdoor defense mechanisms in the future.

Read more

5/31/2024

Exploiting the Vulnerability of Large Language Models via Defense-Aware Architectural Backdoor
Total Score

0

Exploiting the Vulnerability of Large Language Models via Defense-Aware Architectural Backdoor

Abdullah Arafat Miah, Yu Bi

Deep neural networks (DNNs) have long been recognized as vulnerable to backdoor attacks. By providing poisoned training data in the fine-tuning process, the attacker can implant a backdoor into the victim model. This enables input samples meeting specific textual trigger patterns to be classified as target labels of the attacker's choice. While such black-box attacks have been well explored in both computer vision and natural language processing (NLP), backdoor attacks relying on white-box attack philosophy have hardly been thoroughly investigated. In this paper, we take the first step to introduce a new type of backdoor attack that conceals itself within the underlying model architecture. Specifically, we propose to design separate backdoor modules consisting of two functions: trigger detection and noise injection. The add-on modules of model architecture layers can detect the presence of input trigger tokens and modify layer weights using Gaussian noise to disturb the feature distribution of the baseline model. We conduct extensive experiments to evaluate our attack methods using two model architecture settings on five different large language datasets. We demonstrate that the training-free architectural backdoor on a large language model poses a genuine threat. Unlike the-state-of-art work, it can survive the rigorous fine-tuning and retraining process, as well as evade output probability-based defense methods (i.e. BDDR). All the code and data is available https://github.com/SiSL-URI/Arch_Backdoor_LLM.

Read more

9/10/2024