Bayesian Active Learning in the Presence of Nuisance Parameters
0
📊
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- In many real-world settings, such as scientific inference, optimization, and transfer learning, the goal is to estimate a specific target parameter rather than characterize the entire data-generating process.
- However, the learner must often deal with additional sources of uncertainty or "nuisance parameters" that can introduce bias, a phenomenon known as "negative interference."
- Bayesian active learning, or sequential optimal experimental design, is a natural framework for handling nuisance parameters, but the presence of these parameters can fundamentally change the learner's task.
Plain English Explanation
In many situations, such as scientific research, optimization problems, and transfer learning, the goal is to estimate a specific target value or parameter. However, there may be other factors or "nuisance parameters" that introduce uncertainty and can lead to bias in the learner's estimate of the target parameter. This is known as "negative interference."
Bayesian active learning is a useful approach for dealing with nuisance parameters, but their presence can complicate the learner's task. The learner must decide whether to focus their finite resources on estimating the target parameter or the nuisance parameters in order to reduce the negative interference.
This setting also encompasses Bayesian transfer learning as a special case, providing insights into the phenomenon of "negative transfer" between learning environments.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores the challenges that nuisance parameters pose for Bayesian active learners. Nuisance parameters are additional sources of uncertainty or variables that the learner must contend with, beyond the target parameter they are trying to estimate.
The authors show that the presence of nuisance parameters can lead to significant bias in the learner's estimate of the target parameter, a problem they refer to as "negative interference." They characterize the threat of negative interference and how it fundamentally changes the nature of the Bayesian active learner's task.
The authors demonstrate that the extent of negative interference can be extremely large, and that accurate estimation of the nuisance parameters is critical to reducing it. This confronts the Bayesian active learner with a dilemma: whether to spend their finite acquisition budget pursuing estimation of the target parameter or the nuisance parameters.
The paper's findings have implications for Bayesian transfer learning and shed light on the phenomenon of "negative transfer" between learning environments, where knowledge gained in one context can actually hinder performance in another.
Critical Analysis
The paper raises important considerations for Bayesian active learning and transfer learning in the presence of nuisance parameters. The authors acknowledge that their analysis may be overly pessimistic in certain cases, as the degree of negative interference can depend on the specific problem and data.
Additionally, the paper does not explore potential mitigation strategies or alternative approaches that the Bayesian active learner could employ to address the challenges posed by nuisance parameters. Calibration-aware Bayesian learning or constrained learning methods could potentially offer ways to handle nuisance parameters more effectively.
Further research is needed to understand the extent of negative interference in real-world applications and to develop Bayesian adaptive calibration or other techniques to mitigate its impact on Bayesian active learning and transfer learning.
Conclusion
This paper highlights the significant challenge that nuisance parameters can pose for Bayesian active learners, leading to potentially large biases in the estimation of target parameters. The authors characterize the "negative interference" problem and show that accurate estimation of nuisance parameters is critical to reducing this issue.
The findings have implications for Bayesian transfer learning and shed light on the phenomenon of negative transfer between learning environments. While the analysis may be overly pessimistic in certain cases, the paper raises important considerations for the design of Bayesian active learning systems and suggests the need for further research into mitigation strategies.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
📊
0
Bayesian Active Learning in the Presence of Nuisance Parameters
Sabina J. Sloman, Ayush Bharti, Julien Martinelli, Samuel Kaski
In many settings, such as scientific inference, optimization, and transfer learning, the learner has a well-defined objective, which can be treated as estimation of a target parameter, and no intrinsic interest in characterizing the entire data-generating process. Usually, the learner must also contend with additional sources of uncertainty or variables -- with nuisance parameters. Bayesian active learning, or sequential optimal experimental design, can straightforwardly accommodate the presence of nuisance parameters, and so is a natural active learning framework for such problems. However, the introduction of nuisance parameters can lead to bias in the Bayesian learner's estimate of the target parameters, a phenomenon we refer to as negative interference. We characterize the threat of negative interference and how it fundamentally changes the nature of the Bayesian active learner's task. We show that the extent of negative interference can be extremely large, and that accurate estimation of the nuisance parameters is critical to reducing it. The Bayesian active learner is confronted with a dilemma: whether to spend a finite acquisition budget in pursuit of estimation of the target or of the nuisance parameters. Our setting encompasses Bayesian transfer learning as a special case, and our results shed light on the phenomenon of negative transfer between learning environments.
Read more6/11/2024
🔄
0
Active Learning and Bayesian Optimization: a Unified Perspective to Learn with a Goal
Francesco Di Fiore, Michela Nardelli, Laura Mainini
Science and Engineering applications are typically associated with expensive optimization problems to identify optimal design solutions and states of the system of interest. Bayesian optimization and active learning compute surrogate models through efficient adaptive sampling schemes to assist and accelerate this search task toward a given optimization goal. Both those methodologies are driven by specific infill/learning criteria which quantify the utility with respect to the set goal of evaluating the objective function for unknown combinations of optimization variables. While the two fields have seen an exponential growth in popularity in the past decades, their dualism and synergy have received relatively little attention to date. This paper discusses and formalizes the synergy between Bayesian optimization and active learning as symbiotic adaptive sampling methodologies driven by common principles. In particular, we demonstrate this unified perspective through the formalization of the analogy between the Bayesian infill criteria and active learning criteria as driving principles of both the goal-driven procedures. To support our original perspective, we propose a general classification of adaptive sampling techniques to highlight similarities and differences between the vast families of adaptive sampling, active learning, and Bayesian optimization. Accordingly, the synergy is demonstrated mapping the Bayesian infill criteria with the active learning criteria, and is formalized for searches informed by both a single information source and multiple levels of fidelity. In addition, we provide guidelines to apply those learning criteria investigating the performance of different Bayesian schemes for a variety of benchmark problems to highlight benefits and limitations over mathematical properties that characterize real-world applications.
Read more7/9/2024
0
Deep Bayesian Active Learning for Preference Modeling in Large Language Models
Luckeciano C. Melo, Panagiotis Tigas, Alessandro Abate, Yarin Gal
Leveraging human preferences for steering the behavior of Large Language Models (LLMs) has demonstrated notable success in recent years. Nonetheless, data selection and labeling are still a bottleneck for these systems, particularly at large scale. Hence, selecting the most informative points for acquiring human feedback may considerably reduce the cost of preference labeling and unleash the further development of LLMs. Bayesian Active Learning provides a principled framework for addressing this challenge and has demonstrated remarkable success in diverse settings. However, previous attempts to employ it for Preference Modeling did not meet such expectations. In this work, we identify that naive epistemic uncertainty estimation leads to the acquisition of redundant samples. We address this by proposing the Bayesian Active Learner for Preference Modeling (BAL-PM), a novel stochastic acquisition policy that not only targets points of high epistemic uncertainty according to the preference model but also seeks to maximize the entropy of the acquired prompt distribution in the feature space spanned by the employed LLM. Notably, our experiments demonstrate that BAL-PM requires 33% to 68% fewer preference labels in two popular human preference datasets and exceeds previous stochastic Bayesian acquisition policies.
Read more6/17/2024
0
Classification under Nuisance Parameters and Generalized Label Shift in Likelihood-Free Inference
Luca Masserano, Alex Shen, Michele Doro, Tommaso Dorigo, Rafael Izbicki, Ann B. Lee
An open scientific challenge is how to classify events with reliable measures of uncertainty, when we have a mechanistic model of the data-generating process but the distribution over both labels and latent nuisance parameters is different between train and target data. We refer to this type of distributional shift as generalized label shift (GLS). Direct classification using observed data $mathbf{X}$ as covariates leads to biased predictions and invalid uncertainty estimates of labels $Y$. We overcome these biases by proposing a new method for robust uncertainty quantification that casts classification as a hypothesis testing problem under nuisance parameters. The key idea is to estimate the classifier's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) across the entire nuisance parameter space, which allows us to devise cutoffs that are invariant under GLS. Our method effectively endows a pre-trained classifier with domain adaptation capabilities and returns valid prediction sets while maintaining high power. We demonstrate its performance on two challenging scientific problems in biology and astroparticle physics with data from realistic mechanistic models.
Read more7/2/2024