Benchmarking Representations for Speech, Music, and Acoustic Events
0
🌐
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- The paper presents a new benchmark called ARCH for evaluating audio representation learning (ARL) methods on a diverse range of audio classification tasks.
- ARCH comprises 12 datasets covering acoustic events, music, and speech, which allows for a comprehensive assessment of pre-trained self-supervised learning (SSL) models.
- The authors also release new pre-trained models for non-speech audio tasks, as this has been a lack in the current open-source landscape.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new benchmark called ARCH that is designed to more thoroughly evaluate the capabilities of audio representation learning (ARL) methods. ARL is a technique used to extract meaningful features from audio data that can be useful for a variety of tasks, such as acoustic music understanding or speech analysis.
The authors argue that existing benchmarks for evaluating ARL methods have limited diversity, which can make it difficult to systematically compare the capabilities of different methods. ARCH aims to address this by including a wide range of audio datasets covering acoustic events, music, and speech. This allows researchers to more comprehensively assess how well pre-trained self-supervised learning (SSL) models perform on different types of audio data.
In addition, the paper presents new pre-trained models for non-speech audio tasks, as the authors note that there is a lack of open-source models available for these types of applications. By providing these new models, the researchers hope to enable more progress in the field of audio representation learning.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces ARCH, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating audio representation learning (ARL) methods. ARCH consists of 12 diverse datasets covering acoustic events, music, and speech, which allows for thorough assessment of pre-trained self-supervised learning (SSL) models of different sizes.
The authors argue that existing benchmarks have limited diversity, which can hinder systematic comparison of current ARL methods' capabilities. ARCH aims to address this by providing unified access to a wide range of audio domains, as well as the ability to readily incorporate new datasets and models.
To address the current lack of open-source, pre-trained models for non-speech audio, the paper also presents new pre-trained models that demonstrate strong performance on non-speech datasets. The authors believe that the wide-ranging evaluation provided by ARCH offers valuable insights into the state-of-the-art in ARL and can help identify promising research directions.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the need for a more comprehensive benchmark like ARCH to evaluate ARL methods. The authors acknowledge that ARCH has some limitations, such as the specific datasets included and the potential for bias in the pre-trained models they provide.
One area for further research could be exploring the transfer learning capabilities of the pre-trained models across different domains and tasks, which was not the main focus of this paper. Additionally, the authors could have provided more details on their model training and evaluation procedures to allow for easier replication and extension of their work.
Overall, the ARCH benchmark represents a valuable contribution to the field of audio representation learning. By providing a standardized, diverse evaluation platform, the authors have laid the groundwork for more systematic comparisons of ARL techniques and the identification of promising areas for future research and development.
Conclusion
The paper presents ARCH, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating audio representation learning (ARL) methods. ARCH addresses the limited diversity in existing benchmarks by including a wide range of audio datasets covering acoustic events, music, and speech. This allows for a thorough assessment of pre-trained self-supervised learning (SSL) models and their capabilities across different audio domains.
In addition, the authors release new pre-trained models for non-speech audio tasks, filling a gap in the current open-source landscape. The wide-ranging evaluation provided by ARCH offers valuable insights into the state-of-the-art in ARL and can help identify promising research directions to advance the field.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🌐
0
Benchmarking Representations for Speech, Music, and Acoustic Events
Moreno La Quatra, Alkis Koudounas, Lorenzo Vaiani, Elena Baralis, Luca Cagliero, Paolo Garza, Sabato Marco Siniscalchi
Limited diversity in standardized benchmarks for evaluating audio representation learning (ARL) methods may hinder systematic comparison of current methods' capabilities. We present ARCH, a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating ARL methods on diverse audio classification domains, covering acoustic events, music, and speech. ARCH comprises 12 datasets, that allow us to thoroughly assess pre-trained SSL models of different sizes. ARCH streamlines benchmarking of ARL techniques through its unified access to a wide range of domains and its ability to readily incorporate new datasets and models. To address the current lack of open-source, pre-trained models for non-speech audio, we also release new pre-trained models that demonstrate strong performance on non-speech datasets. We argue that the presented wide-ranging evaluation provides valuable insights into state-of-the-art ARL methods, and is useful to pinpoint promising research directions.
Read more5/3/2024
0
AudioBench: A Universal Benchmark for Audio Large Language Models
Bin Wang, Xunlong Zou, Geyu Lin, Shuo Sun, Zhuohan Liu, Wenyu Zhang, Zhengyuan Liu, AiTi Aw, Nancy F. Chen
We introduce AudioBench, a universal benchmark designed to evaluate Audio Large Language Models (AudioLLMs). It encompasses 8 distinct tasks and 26 datasets, among which, 7 are newly proposed datasets. The evaluation targets three main aspects: speech understanding, audio scene understanding, and voice understanding (paralinguistic). Despite recent advancements, there lacks a comprehensive benchmark for AudioLLMs on instruction following capabilities conditioned on audio signals. AudioBench addresses this gap by setting up datasets as well as desired evaluation metrics. Besides, we also evaluated the capabilities of five popular models and found that no single model excels consistently across all tasks. We outline the research outlook for AudioLLMs and anticipate that our open-sourced evaluation toolkit, data, and leaderboard will offer a robust testbed for future model developments.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Audio-Language Datasets of Scenes and Events: A Survey
Gijs Wijngaard, Elia Formisano, Michele Esposito, Michel Dumontier
Audio-language models (ALMs) process sounds to provide a linguistic description of sound-producing events and scenes. Recent advances in computing power and dataset creation have led to significant progress in this domain. This paper surveys existing datasets used for training audio-language models, emphasizing the recent trend towards using large, diverse datasets to enhance model performance. Key sources of these datasets include the Freesound platform and AudioSet that have contributed to the field's rapid growth. Although prior surveys primarily address techniques and training details, this survey categorizes and evaluates a wide array of datasets, addressing their origins, characteristics, and use cases. It also performs a data leak analysis to ensure dataset integrity and mitigate bias between datasets. This survey was conducted by analyzing research papers up to and including December 2023, and does not contain any papers after that period.
Read more7/10/2024
0
AIR-Bench: Benchmarking Large Audio-Language Models via Generative Comprehension
Qian Yang, Jin Xu, Wenrui Liu, Yunfei Chu, Ziyue Jiang, Xiaohuan Zhou, Yichong Leng, Yuanjun Lv, Zhou Zhao, Chang Zhou, Jingren Zhou
Recently, instruction-following audio-language models have received broad attention for human-audio interaction. However, the absence of benchmarks capable of evaluating audio-centric interaction capabilities has impeded advancements in this field. Previous models primarily focus on assessing different fundamental tasks, such as Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR), and lack an assessment of the open-ended generative capabilities centered around audio. Thus, it is challenging to track the progression in the Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) domain and to provide guidance for future improvement. In this paper, we introduce AIR-Bench (textbf{A}udio textbf{I}nsttextbf{R}uction textbf{Bench}mark), the first benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of LALMs to understand various types of audio signals (including human speech, natural sounds, and music), and furthermore, to interact with humans in the textual format. AIR-Bench encompasses two dimensions: textit{foundation} and textit{chat} benchmarks. The former consists of 19 tasks with approximately 19k single-choice questions, intending to inspect the basic single-task ability of LALMs. The latter one contains 2k instances of open-ended question-and-answer data, directly assessing the comprehension of the model on complex audio and its capacity to follow instructions. Both benchmarks require the model to generate hypotheses directly. We design a unified framework that leverages advanced language models, such as GPT-4, to evaluate the scores of generated hypotheses given the meta-information of the audio. Experimental results demonstrate a high level of consistency between GPT-4-based evaluation and human evaluation. By revealing the limitations of existing LALMs through evaluation results, AIR-Bench can provide insights into the direction of future research.
Read more7/29/2024