BUFF: Boosted Decision Tree based Ultra-Fast Flow matching
2404.18219
0
0
๐งช
Abstract
Tabular data stands out as one of the most frequently encountered types in high energy physics. Unlike commonly homogeneous data such as pixelated images, simulating high-dimensional tabular data and accurately capturing their correlations are often quite challenging, even with the most advanced architectures. Based on the findings that tree-based models surpass the performance of deep learning models for tasks specific to tabular data, we adopt the very recent generative modeling class named conditional flow matching and employ different techniques to integrate the usage of Gradient Boosted Trees. The performances are evaluated for various tasks on different analysis level with several public datasets. We demonstrate the training and inference time of most high-level simulation tasks can achieve speedup by orders of magnitude. The application can be extended to low-level feature simulation and conditioned generations with competitive performance.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Tabular data is a common type of data in high energy physics
- Simulating high-dimensional tabular data and capturing their correlations is challenging, even with advanced architectures
- Tree-based models have been found to outperform deep learning models for tabular data tasks
- The paper explores a generative modeling approach called conditional flow matching, integrating the use of Gradient Boosted Trees
Plain English Explanation
The paper focuses on a type of data called tabular data, which is frequently encountered in high energy physics. Tabular data is different from more common types of data like images, which are often homogeneous (similar) in nature. Simulating high-dimensional tabular data and accurately capturing the relationships between the different parts of the data can be very difficult, even using the most advanced machine learning models.
The researchers found that tree-based models tend to perform better than deep learning models for tasks involving tabular data. Based on this, they adopted a newer type of generative modeling approach called conditional flow matching, and combined it with techniques using Gradient Boosted Trees.
The paper evaluates the performance of this approach on various tasks and datasets. The results show that the training and inference (the process of making predictions) time for high-level simulation tasks can be sped up significantly, by orders of magnitude. The researchers also suggest that this approach could be extended to simulate low-level features and generate data with specific conditions.
Technical Explanation
The paper explores the use of a generative modeling technique called conditional flow matching, combined with Gradient Boosted Trees, to work with high-dimensional tabular data. The researchers note that while tree-based models have been shown to outperform deep learning models for tasks specific to tabular data, simulating and capturing the correlations in such high-dimensional data remains a challenge.
To address this, the paper adopts the conditional flow matching approach, which is a recent development in generative modeling. The researchers integrate the use of Gradient Boosted Trees, a type of ensemble learning method, into this framework. The performance of this approach is evaluated on various analysis tasks and public datasets, including comparative studies of deep learning approaches for multi-dimensional flow cytometry data.
The results show that the training and inference time for high-level simulation tasks can be improved by orders of magnitude compared to previous methods. The researchers also suggest that this approach could be extended to simulate low-level features and generate data with specific conditions, potentially with competitive performance.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach for working with high-dimensional tabular data, which is a common challenge in fields like high energy physics. The integration of Gradient Boosted Trees with the conditional flow matching framework appears to be a valuable contribution, as the researchers demonstrate significant improvements in simulation speed and performance.
However, the paper does not delve deeply into the limitations or potential drawbacks of the proposed method. For example, it would be helpful to understand the computational complexity of the approach, or how it scales with the size and dimensionality of the tabular data. Additionally, the paper does not provide a detailed comparison to other state-of-the-art generative modeling techniques for tabular data, which could help readers better assess the relative merits of the proposed solution.
Further research could also explore the robustness of the method to different types of tabular data, such as data with missing values, imbalanced classes, or mixed data types. Investigating the interpretability and explainability of the generated samples could also be a valuable avenue for future work.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel approach for working with high-dimensional tabular data, a common challenge in fields like high energy physics. By integrating Gradient Boosted Trees with a generative modeling technique called conditional flow matching, the researchers demonstrate significant improvements in the training and inference time for high-level simulation tasks.
The potential to extend this approach to simulate low-level features and generate data with specific conditions is promising, and could have broader implications for fields that rely on complex, high-dimensional tabular data. While the paper does not fully address the limitations of the method, it represents an important step forward in addressing a long-standing challenge in working with this type of data.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Generative modeling of density regression through tree flows
Zhuoqun Wang, Naoki Awaya, Li Ma
0
0
A common objective in the analysis of tabular data is estimating the conditional distribution (in contrast to only producing predictions) of a set of outcome variables given a set of covariates, which is sometimes referred to as the density regression problem. Beyond estimation on the conditional distribution, the generative ability of drawing synthetic samples from the learned conditional distribution is also desired as it further widens the range of applications. We propose a flow-based generative model tailored for the density regression task on tabular data. Our flow applies a sequence of tree-based piecewise-linear transforms on initial uniform noise to eventually generate samples from complex conditional densities of (univariate or multivariate) outcomes given the covariates and allows efficient analytical evaluation of the fitted conditional density on any point in the sample space. We introduce a training algorithm for fitting the tree-based transforms using a divide-and-conquer strategy that transforms maximum likelihood training of the tree-flow into training a collection of binary classifiers--one at each tree split--under cross-entropy loss. We assess the performance of our method under out-of-sample likelihood evaluation and compare it with a variety of state-of-the-art conditional density learners on a range of simulated and real benchmark tabular datasets. Our method consistently achieves comparable or superior performance at a fraction of the training and sampling budget. Finally, we demonstrate the utility of our method's generative ability through an application to generating synthetic longitudinal microbiome compositional data based on training our flow on a publicly available microbiome study.
6/11/2024
A Federated Learning Benchmark on Tabular Data: Comparing Tree-Based Models and Neural Networks
William Lindskog, Christian Prehofer
0
0
Federated Learning (FL) has lately gained traction as it addresses how machine learning models train on distributed datasets. FL was designed for parametric models, namely Deep Neural Networks (DNNs).Thus, it has shown promise on image and text tasks. However, FL for tabular data has received little attention. Tree-Based Models (TBMs) have been considered to perform better on tabular data and they are starting to see FL integrations. In this study, we benchmark federated TBMs and DNNs for horizontal FL, with varying data partitions, on 10 well-known tabular datasets. Our novel benchmark results indicates that current federated boosted TBMs perform better than federated DNNs in different data partitions. Furthermore, a federated XGBoost outperforms all other models. Lastly, we find that federated TBMs perform better than federated parametric models, even when increasing the number of clients significantly.
5/6/2024
New!A Closer Look at Deep Learning on Tabular Data
Han-Jia Ye, Si-Yang Liu, Hao-Run Cai, Qi-Le Zhou, De-Chuan Zhan
0
0
Tabular data is prevalent across various domains in machine learning. Although Deep Neural Network (DNN)-based methods have shown promising performance comparable to tree-based ones, in-depth evaluation of these methods is challenging due to varying performance ranks across diverse datasets. In this paper, we propose a comprehensive benchmark comprising 300 tabular datasets, covering a wide range of task types, size distributions, and domains. We perform an extensive comparison between state-of-the-art deep tabular methods and tree-based methods, revealing the average rank of all methods and highlighting the key factors that influence the success of deep tabular methods. Next, we analyze deep tabular methods based on their training dynamics, including changes in validation metrics and other statistics. For each dataset-method pair, we learn a mapping from both the meta-features of datasets and the first part of the validation curve to the final validation set performance and even the evolution of validation curves. This mapping extracts essential meta-features that influence prediction accuracy, helping the analysis of tabular methods from novel aspects. Based on the performance of all methods on this large benchmark, we identify two subsets of 45 datasets each. The first subset contains datasets that favor either tree-based methods or DNN-based methods, serving as effective analysis tools to evaluate strategies (e.g., attribute encoding strategies) for improving deep tabular models. The second subset contains datasets where the ranks of methods are consistent with the overall benchmark, acting as a probe for tabular analysis. These ``tiny tabular benchmarks'' will facilitate further studies on tabular data.
7/2/2024
โจ
Optimized Feature Generation for Tabular Data via LLMs with Decision Tree Reasoning
Jaehyun Nam, Kyuyoung Kim, Seunghyuk Oh, Jihoon Tack, Jaehyung Kim, Jinwoo Shin
0
0
Learning effective representations from raw data is crucial for the success of deep learning methods. However, in the tabular domain, practitioners often prefer augmenting raw column features over using learned representations, as conventional tree-based algorithms frequently outperform competing approaches. As a result, feature engineering methods that automatically generate candidate features have been widely used. While these approaches are often effective, there remains ambiguity in defining the space over which to search for candidate features. Moreover, they often rely solely on validation scores to select good features, neglecting valuable feedback from past experiments that could inform the planning of future experiments. To address the shortcomings, we propose a new tabular learning framework based on large language models (LLMs), coined Optimizing Column feature generator with decision Tree reasoning (OCTree). Our key idea is to leverage LLMs' reasoning capabilities to find good feature generation rules without manually specifying the search space and provide language-based reasoning information highlighting past experiments as feedback for iterative rule improvements. Here, we choose a decision tree as reasoning as it can be interpreted in natural language, effectively conveying knowledge of past experiments (i.e., the prediction models trained with the generated features) to the LLM. Our empirical results demonstrate that this simple framework consistently enhances the performance of various prediction models across diverse tabular benchmarks, outperforming competing automatic feature engineering methods.
6/14/2024