Can Github issues be solved with Tree Of Thoughts?
2405.13057
0
0
🎯
Abstract
While there have been extensive studies in code generation by large language models (LLM), where benchmarks like HumanEval have been surpassed with an impressive 96.3% success rate, these benchmarks predominantly judge a model's performance on basic function-level code generation and lack the critical thinking and concept of scope required of real-world scenarios such as solving GitHub issues. This research introduces the application of the Tree of Thoughts (ToT) language model reasoning framework for enhancing the decision-making and problem-solving abilities of LLMs for this complex task. Compared to traditional input-output (IO) prompting and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques, ToT is designed to improve performance by facilitating a structured exploration of multiple reasoning trajectories and enabling self-assessment of potential solutions. We experimentally deploy ToT in tackling a Github issue contained within an instance of the SWE-bench. However, our results reveal that the ToT framework alone is not enough to give LLMs the critical reasoning capabilities to outperform existing methods. In this paper we analyze the potential causes of these shortcomings and identify key areas for improvement such as deepening the thought process and introducing agentic capabilities. The insights of this research are aimed at informing future directions for refining the application of ToT and better harnessing the potential of LLMs in real-world problem-solving scenarios.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Existing benchmarks for large language models (LLMs) primarily focus on basic code generation, but lack the critical thinking and scope required for real-world problem-solving like fixing GitHub issues.
- This research explores the application of the Tree of Thoughts (ToT) framework to enhance the decision-making and problem-solving abilities of LLMs for this complex task.
- The ToT framework is designed to improve performance by facilitating a structured exploration of multiple reasoning trajectories and enabling self-assessment of potential solutions, in contrast to traditional input-output (IO) prompting and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques.
- The researchers experimentally deploy ToT to tackle a GitHub issue, but the results reveal that the ToT framework alone is not enough to give LLMs the critical reasoning capabilities to outperform existing methods.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) have made impressive progress in generating basic code, with some models even achieving a 96.3% success rate on a popular benchmark called HumanEval. However, these benchmarks mainly focus on simple code generation tasks and don't really test the model's ability to think critically and understand the broader context, which is essential for solving real-world problems like fixing issues on GitHub.
This research explores a new approach called the Tree of Thoughts (ToT) framework to try to improve the problem-solving abilities of LLMs. The ToT framework is designed to help the models explore different ways of solving a problem, and then assess which solution might work best. This is different from traditional methods, which often just focus on a single input-output approach or rely on retrieving information from other sources.
The researchers tested the ToT framework by having the LLMs try to solve a GitHub issue from a dataset called SWE-bench. However, the results showed that the ToT framework alone wasn't enough to give the LLMs the critical thinking skills needed to outperform existing methods. The paper analyzes why this might be the case and identifies areas for improvement, such as making the thought process deeper and giving the models more autonomy in their problem-solving.
Overall, this research is an important step in trying to make LLMs better at tackling real-world problems, and the insights it provides could help guide future efforts to enhance the reasoning capabilities of these powerful language models.
Technical Explanation
The researchers in this paper explore the application of the Tree of Thoughts (ToT) framework to enhance the decision-making and problem-solving abilities of large language models (LLMs) for the complex task of solving GitHub issues.
Compared to traditional input-output (IO) prompting and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques, the ToT framework is designed to improve performance by facilitating a structured exploration of multiple reasoning trajectories and enabling self-assessment of potential solutions.
The researchers experimentally deploy the ToT framework to tackle a GitHub issue contained within the SWE-bench dataset. However, their results reveal that the ToT framework alone is not enough to give LLMs the critical reasoning capabilities to outperform existing methods.
The paper analyzes the potential causes of these shortcomings and identifies key areas for improvement, such as deepening the thought process and introducing agentic capabilities to the models. The insights from this research aim to inform future directions for refining the application of ToT and better harnessing the potential of LLMs in real-world problem-solving scenarios.
Critical Analysis
The researchers acknowledge the limitations of the ToT framework in this study, noting that it alone is not sufficient to give LLMs the critical reasoning capabilities required for outperforming existing methods on the complex task of solving GitHub issues.
One potential concern is the depth of the thought process facilitated by the ToT framework. The paper suggests that deepening the thought process may be a key area for improvement, indicating that the current implementation may not be capturing the full breadth and complexity of reasoning required for real-world problem-solving.
Additionally, the researchers identify the need for introducing agentic capabilities to the models, which could potentially allow them to take a more active, autonomous role in the problem-solving process. The current ToT framework may be too reliant on a predetermined structure, limiting the models' ability to adapt and explore solutions in a more flexible, dynamic manner.
Overall, the insights from this research highlight the significant challenges in developing LLMs that can truly excel at complex, real-world problem-solving tasks. While the ToT framework represents an interesting approach, the findings suggest that more work is needed to refine and enhance the reasoning capabilities of these models to meet the demands of practical applications.
Conclusion
This research explores the use of the Tree of Thoughts (ToT) framework to improve the decision-making and problem-solving abilities of large language models (LLMs) in the context of solving GitHub issues.
While existing benchmarks have shown impressive results for LLMs in basic code generation, the researchers note that these tests lack the critical thinking and scope required for real-world problem-solving scenarios. The ToT framework is designed to address this gap by facilitating a more structured exploration of multiple reasoning trajectories and enabling self-assessment of potential solutions.
However, the experimental deployment of the ToT framework in tackling a GitHub issue from the SWE-bench dataset revealed that this approach alone is not enough to give LLMs the critical reasoning capabilities needed to outperform existing methods. The paper analyzes the potential causes of these shortcomings and identifies key areas for improvement, such as deepening the thought process and introducing agentic capabilities to the models.
The insights from this research aim to inform future efforts to refine the application of the ToT framework and better harness the potential of LLMs in tackling complex, real-world problem-solving tasks. Overcoming the limitations identified in this study will be crucial for advancing the capabilities of these powerful language models and expanding their practical applications.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
Synergy-of-Thoughts: Eliciting Efficient Reasoning in Hybrid Language Models
Yu Shang, Yu Li, Fengli Xu, Yong Li
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive emergent abilities in a wide range of tasks, but still face challenges in handling complex reasoning problems. Previous works like chain-of-thought (CoT) and tree-of-thoughts (ToT) have predominately focused on enhancing accuracy, but overlook the rapidly increasing token cost, which could be particularly problematic for open-ended real-world tasks with huge solution spaces. Motivated by the dual process theory of human cognition, we propose Synergy of Thoughts (SoT) to unleash the synergistic potential of hybrid LLMs for efficient reasoning. By default, SoT uses smaller-scale language models to generate multiple low-cost reasoning thoughts, which resembles the parallel intuitions produced by System 1. If these intuitions exhibit conflicts, SoT will invoke the reflective reasoning of scaled-up language models to emulate the intervention of System 2, which will override the intuitive thoughts and rectify the reasoning process. This framework is model-agnostic and training-free, which can be flexibly implemented with various off-the-shelf LLMs. Experiments on six representative reasoning tasks show that SoT substantially reduces the token cost by 38.3%-75.1%, and simultaneously achieves state-of-the-art reasoning accuracy and solution diversity. Notably, the average token cost reduction on open-ended tasks reaches up to 69.1%. Code repo with all prompts will be released upon publication.
5/24/2024
📊
Empowering Multi-step Reasoning across Languages via Tree-of-Thoughts
Leonardo Ranaldi, Giulia Pucci, Federico Ranaldi, Elena Sofia Ruzzetti, Fabio Massimo Zanzotto
0
0
Reasoning methods, best exemplified by the well-known Chain-of-Thought (CoT), empower the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by eliciting them to solve complex tasks in a step-by-step manner. Although they are achieving significant success, the ability to deliver multi-step reasoning remains limited to English because of the imbalance in the distribution of pre-training data, which makes other languages a barrier. In this paper, we propose Cross-lingual Tree-of-Thoughts (Cross-ToT), a method for aligning Cross-lingual CoT reasoning across languages. The proposed method, through a self-consistent cross-lingual prompting mechanism inspired by the Tree-of-Thoughts approach, provides multi-step reasoning paths in different languages that, during the steps, lead to the final solution. Experimental evaluations show that our method significantly outperforms existing prompting methods by reducing the number of interactions and achieving state-of-the-art performance.
6/24/2024
On the Empirical Complexity of Reasoning and Planning in LLMs
Liwei Kang, Zirui Zhao, David Hsu, Wee Sun Lee
0
0
Chain-of-thought (CoT), tree-of-thought (ToT), and related techniques work surprisingly well in practice for some complex reasoning tasks with Large Language Models (LLMs), but why? This work seeks the underlying reasons by conducting experimental case studies and linking the performance benefits to well-established sample and computational complexity principles in machine learning. We experimented with 6 reasoning tasks, ranging from grade school math, air travel planning, ..., to Blocksworld. The results suggest that (i) both CoT and ToT benefit significantly from task decomposition, which breaks a complex reasoning task into a sequence of steps with low sample complexity and explicitly outlines the reasoning structure, and (ii) for computationally hard reasoning tasks, the more sophisticated tree structure of ToT outperforms the linear structure of CoT. These findings provide useful guidelines for the use of LLM in solving reasoning tasks in practice.
6/19/2024
🔍
Algorithm of Thoughts: Enhancing Exploration of Ideas in Large Language Models
Bilgehan Sel, Ahmad Al-Tawaha, Vanshaj Khattar, Ruoxi Jia, Ming Jin
0
0
Current literature, aiming to surpass the Chain-of-Thought approach, often resorts to external modi operandi involving halting, modifying, and then resuming the generation process to boost Large Language Models' (LLMs) reasoning capacities. Due to their myopic perspective, they escalate the number of query requests, leading to increased costs, memory, and computational overheads. Addressing this, we propose the Algorithm of Thoughts -- a novel strategy that propels LLMs through algorithmic reasoning pathways. By employing algorithmic examples fully in-context, this overarching view of the whole process exploits the innate recurrence dynamics of LLMs, expanding their idea exploration with merely one or a few queries. Our technique outperforms earlier single-query methods and even more recent multi-query strategies that employ an extensive tree search algorithms while using significantly fewer tokens. Intriguingly, our results suggest that instructing an LLM using an algorithm can lead to performance surpassing that of the algorithm itself, hinting at LLM's inherent ability to weave its intuition into optimized searches. We probe into the underpinnings of our method's efficacy and its nuances in application. The code and related content can be found in: https://algorithm-of-thoughts.github.io.
6/4/2024