Tree of Reviews: A Tree-based Dynamic Iterative Retrieval Framework for Multi-hop Question Answering
2404.14464
0
0
š¤æ
Abstract
Multi-hop question answering is a knowledge-intensive complex problem. Large Language Models (LLMs) use their Chain of Thoughts (CoT) capability to reason complex problems step by step, and retrieval-augmentation can effectively alleviate factual errors caused by outdated and unknown knowledge in LLMs. Recent works have introduced retrieval-augmentation in the CoT reasoning to solve multi-hop question answering. However, these chain methods have the following problems: 1) Retrieved irrelevant paragraphs may mislead the reasoning; 2) An error in the chain structure may lead to a cascade of errors. In this paper, we propose a dynamic retrieval framework called Tree of Reviews (ToR), where the root node is the question, and the other nodes are paragraphs from retrieval, extending different reasoning paths from the root node to other nodes. Our framework dynamically decides to initiate a new search, reject, or accept based on the paragraphs on the reasoning paths. Compared to related work, we introduce a tree structure to handle each retrieved paragraph separately, alleviating the misleading effect of irrelevant paragraphs on the reasoning path; the diversity of reasoning path extension reduces the impact of a single reasoning error on the whole. We conducted experiments on three different multi-hop question answering datasets. The results show that compared to the baseline methods, ToR achieves state-of-the-art performance in both retrieval and response generation. In addition, we propose two tree-based search optimization strategies, pruning and effective expansion, to reduce time overhead and increase the diversity of path extension. We will release our code.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Outlines a new dynamic retrieval framework called Tree of Reviews (ToR) for multi-hop question answering
- Aims to address limitations of existing chain-based methods, such as the misleading effect of irrelevant paragraphs and the cascade of errors
- Experiments show ToR achieves state-of-the-art performance in both retrieval and response generation on multiple datasets
Plain English Explanation
Multi-hop question answering is a complex problem that requires reasoning and combining information from multiple sources. Large Language Models (LLMs) use a Chain of Thoughts (CoT) capability to solve these problems step-by-step. However, these chain-based methods have some issues: irrelevant paragraphs retrieved during the process can mislead the reasoning, and a single error in the chain can lead to a cascade of mistakes.
To address these problems, the authors propose a new framework called Tree of Reviews (ToR). Instead of a linear chain, ToR uses a tree structure where the root is the original question, and the other nodes are paragraphs retrieved to help answer the question. This allows ToR to handle each paragraph separately, reducing the impact of irrelevant information, and explore multiple reasoning paths, mitigating the effect of individual errors.
The researchers conducted experiments on several multi-hop question answering datasets and found that ToR outperformed existing methods in both retrieving relevant information and generating final answers. They also proposed two optimization strategies, pruning and effective expansion, to make the tree-based search more efficient and diverse.
Technical Explanation
The authors propose a Tree of Reviews (ToR) framework for multi-hop question answering. Unlike previous chain-based methods, ToR uses a tree structure where the root node is the original question, and the other nodes are paragraphs retrieved to help answer the question.
The key aspects of ToR are:
- Dynamic Retrieval: ToR dynamically decides whether to initiate a new search, reject a paragraph, or accept a paragraph based on the reasoning paths in the tree.
- Separate Paragraph Handling: By using a tree structure, ToR can handle each retrieved paragraph separately, reducing the misleading effect of irrelevant paragraphs.
- Diverse Reasoning Paths: The tree structure allows ToR to explore multiple reasoning paths, which reduces the impact of a single reasoning error on the overall performance.
The authors conducted experiments on three multi-hop question answering datasets and found that ToR outperformed baseline methods in both retrieval and response generation. They also proposed two optimization strategies:
- Pruning: Removing low-performing reasoning paths to reduce computational overhead.
- Effective Expansion: Prioritizing the expansion of promising reasoning paths to increase the diversity of the tree.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a compelling solution to the challenges of multi-hop question answering using large language models. The Tree of Reviews (ToR) framework addresses key issues with existing chain-based methods, such as the impact of irrelevant information and single points of failure.
One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses on improving the retrieval and reasoning process, but does not extensively explore the impact of the language model itself. Enhancing the language model's capabilities through techniques like knowledge graph integration could further improve the overall performance of multi-hop question answering systems.
Additionally, the authors mention the need for better enterprise knowledge base integration to handle real-world scenarios, which could be a fruitful area for future research.
Overall, the Tree of Reviews (ToR) framework represents a significant advancement in the field of multi-hop question answering, and the authors' contributions could have a meaningful impact on the development of more robust and reliable AI systems for complex reasoning tasks.
Conclusion
The paper proposes a new Tree of Reviews (ToR) framework for multi-hop question answering that addresses limitations of existing chain-based methods. ToR uses a dynamic tree structure to handle retrieved information separately and explore diverse reasoning paths, improving both retrieval and response generation performance.
The authors' experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the ToR approach, and the proposed optimization strategies show promise for improving the efficiency and diversity of the tree-based search. This research represents an important step forward in the development of more capable and reliable AI systems for complex knowledge-intensive tasks.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
š
Empowering Multi-step Reasoning across Languages via Tree-of-Thoughts
Leonardo Ranaldi, Giulia Pucci, Federico Ranaldi, Elena Sofia Ruzzetti, Fabio Massimo Zanzotto
0
0
Reasoning methods, best exemplified by the well-known Chain-of-Thought (CoT), empower the reasoning abilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) by eliciting them to solve complex tasks in a step-by-step manner. Although they are achieving significant success, the ability to deliver multi-step reasoning remains limited to English because of the imbalance in the distribution of pre-training data, which makes other languages a barrier. In this paper, we propose Cross-lingual Tree-of-Thoughts (Cross-ToT), a method for aligning Cross-lingual CoT reasoning across languages. The proposed method, through a self-consistent cross-lingual prompting mechanism inspired by the Tree-of-Thoughts approach, provides multi-step reasoning paths in different languages that, during the steps, lead to the final solution. Experimental evaluations show that our method significantly outperforms existing prompting methods by reducing the number of interactions and achieving state-of-the-art performance.
6/24/2024
š¬
Aggregation of Reasoning: A Hierarchical Framework for Enhancing Answer Selection in Large Language Models
Zhangyue Yin, Qiushi Sun, Qipeng Guo, Zhiyuan Zeng, Xiaonan Li, Tianxiang Sun, Cheng Chang, Qinyuan Cheng, Ding Wang, Xiaofeng Mou, Xipeng Qiu, XuanJing Huang
0
0
Recent advancements in Chain-of-Thought prompting have facilitated significant breakthroughs for Large Language Models (LLMs) in complex reasoning tasks. Current research enhances the reasoning performance of LLMs by sampling multiple reasoning chains and ensembling based on the answer frequency. However, this approach fails in scenarios where the correct answers are in the minority. We identify this as a primary factor constraining the reasoning capabilities of LLMs, a limitation that cannot be resolved solely based on the predicted answers. To address this shortcoming, we introduce a hierarchical reasoning aggregation framework AoR (Aggregation of Reasoning), which selects answers based on the evaluation of reasoning chains. Additionally, AoR incorporates dynamic sampling, adjusting the number of reasoning chains in accordance with the complexity of the task. Experimental results on a series of complex reasoning tasks show that AoR outperforms prominent ensemble methods. Further analysis reveals that AoR not only adapts various LLMs but also achieves a superior performance ceiling when compared to current methods.
5/22/2024
Direct Evaluation of Chain-of-Thought in Multi-hop Reasoning with Knowledge Graphs
Minh-Vuong Nguyen, Linhao Luo, Fatemeh Shiri, Dinh Phung, Yuan-Fang Li, Thuy-Trang Vu, Gholamreza Haffari
0
0
Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning abilities when prompted to generate chain-of-thought (CoT) explanations alongside answers. However, previous research on evaluating LLMs has solely focused on answer accuracy, neglecting the correctness of the generated CoT. In this paper, we delve deeper into the CoT reasoning capabilities of LLMs in multi-hop question answering by utilizing knowledge graphs (KGs). We propose a novel discriminative and generative CoT evaluation paradigm to assess LLMs' knowledge of reasoning and the accuracy of the generated CoT. Through experiments conducted on 5 different families of LLMs across 2 multi-hop question-answering datasets, we find that LLMs possess sufficient knowledge to perform reasoning. However, there exists a significant disparity between answer accuracy and faithfulness of the CoT reasoning generated by LLMs, indicating that they often arrive at correct answers through incorrect reasoning.
6/21/2024
šÆ
Can Github issues be solved with Tree Of Thoughts?
Ricardo La Rosa, Corey Hulse, Bangdi Liu
0
0
While there have been extensive studies in code generation by large language models (LLM), where benchmarks like HumanEval have been surpassed with an impressive 96.3% success rate, these benchmarks predominantly judge a model's performance on basic function-level code generation and lack the critical thinking and concept of scope required of real-world scenarios such as solving GitHub issues. This research introduces the application of the Tree of Thoughts (ToT) language model reasoning framework for enhancing the decision-making and problem-solving abilities of LLMs for this complex task. Compared to traditional input-output (IO) prompting and Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) techniques, ToT is designed to improve performance by facilitating a structured exploration of multiple reasoning trajectories and enabling self-assessment of potential solutions. We experimentally deploy ToT in tackling a Github issue contained within an instance of the SWE-bench. However, our results reveal that the ToT framework alone is not enough to give LLMs the critical reasoning capabilities to outperform existing methods. In this paper we analyze the potential causes of these shortcomings and identify key areas for improvement such as deepening the thought process and introducing agentic capabilities. The insights of this research are aimed at informing future directions for refining the application of ToT and better harnessing the potential of LLMs in real-world problem-solving scenarios.
5/24/2024