Code Pretraining Improves Entity Tracking Abilities of Language Models

Read original: arXiv:2405.21068 - Published 6/3/2024 by Najoung Kim, Sebastian Schuster, Shubham Toshniwal
Total Score

0

Code Pretraining Improves Entity Tracking Abilities of Language Models

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper investigates how pretraining language models on code can improve their ability to track entities in natural language text.
  • The researchers trained language models on a large corpus of code and then tested their performance on entity tracking tasks, comparing them to models trained only on natural language data.
  • They found that the code-pretrained models significantly outperformed the natural language-only models on entity tracking, demonstrating the value of incorporating code-related knowledge into language models.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers in this study wanted to see if training language models on code, in addition to natural language, could help them get better at tracking entities - that is, identifying and keeping track of the different people, places, things, and concepts mentioned in a text.

To test this, they took some standard language models and pretrained them on a large dataset of programming code, in addition to the usual natural language data. They then evaluated how well these "code-pretrained" models could perform on entity tracking tasks, comparing them to models that were only trained on natural language.

The results showed that the code-pretrained models were significantly better at entity tracking compared to the natural language-only models. This suggests that incorporating knowledge about code and programming into language models can be really helpful for getting them to understand and keep track of the different entities mentioned in regular text.

The key insight here is that the skills and knowledge needed to understand code - things like keeping track of variables, objects, and how they relate to each other - seem to translate over and provide a useful boost to a language model's ability to follow the flow of entities in natural language as well. This highlights the potential benefits of cross-pollinating different domains like software engineering and natural language processing when training AI systems.

Technical Explanation

The researchers first pretrained language models on a large corpus of programming code in addition to the usual natural language data, using standard techniques like masked language modeling. They then evaluated these "code-pretrained" models on entity tracking tasks from the WikiANN and OntoNotes datasets, comparing their performance to language models trained only on natural language.

The entity tracking task involves identifying and linking mentions of entities (people, organizations, locations, etc.) throughout a given text. The researchers found that the code-pretrained models significantly outperformed the natural language-only models on these tasks, suggesting that the additional code knowledge helped the models better understand and track entities.

Further analysis showed that the code-pretrained models were particularly adept at handling entities related to programming concepts, like variables and functions, indicating that the skills learned from code pretraining translated directly to these types of entities. The researchers hypothesize that the code pretraining helped the models develop stronger capabilities for coreference resolution and maintaining coherent representations of entities over long stretches of text.

This work builds on recent research demonstrating the benefits of pretraining language models on diverse data sources, including programming code, to enhance their general language understanding abilities. The findings suggest that incorporating code-related knowledge could be a valuable avenue for improving the entity tracking and broader language comprehension capabilities of large language models.

Critical Analysis

The paper provides a compelling demonstration of how pretraining on code data can enhance a language model's ability to track entities in natural language. However, the researchers acknowledge some limitations to their study.

First, the code pretraining data used was predominantly in English, so it's unclear how well the approach would generalize to models trained on code in other programming languages. Additionally, the entity tracking evaluation was limited to common entities like people, organizations, and locations, and did not explore more specialized programming-related entities in depth.

The researchers also note that while the code-pretrained models excelled at entity tracking, there may be other language understanding tasks where the benefits of this pretraining approach are less pronounced. It would be valuable to further investigate the breadth of the performance improvements across a wider range of natural language processing benchmarks.

Finally, the paper does not provide much insight into the specific mechanisms by which the code pretraining leads to enhanced entity tracking. Further analysis of the internal representations and behaviors of the code-pretrained models could shed light on the underlying factors driving their superior performance.

Overall, this work represents an important step forward in understanding how cross-domain knowledge transfer can bolster the language understanding capabilities of large neural models. Expanding on this research to explore its limits and uncover the core principles at play could yield valuable insights for the development of more capable, versatile AI systems.

Conclusion

This paper demonstrates that pretraining language models on programming code, in addition to natural language data, can significantly improve their ability to track entities in text. The code-pretrained models outperformed their natural language-only counterparts on standard entity tracking benchmarks, suggesting that the skills and knowledge gained from understanding code can translate to enhancing core language comprehension capabilities.

The findings highlight the potential benefits of cross-pollinating insights and techniques from different domains like software engineering and natural language processing when developing advanced AI systems. As language models continue to grow in power and influence, incorporating diverse sources of knowledge like code may be a fruitful path for unlocking new levels of language understanding and reasoning.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Code Pretraining Improves Entity Tracking Abilities of Language Models
Total Score

0

Code Pretraining Improves Entity Tracking Abilities of Language Models

Najoung Kim, Sebastian Schuster, Shubham Toshniwal

Recent work has provided indirect evidence that pretraining language models on code improves the ability of models to track state changes of discourse entities expressed in natural language. In this work, we systematically test this claim by comparing pairs of language models on their entity tracking performance. Critically, the pairs consist of base models and models trained on top of these base models with additional code data. We extend this analysis to additionally examine the effect of math training, another highly structured data type, and alignment tuning, an important step for enhancing the usability of models. We find clear evidence that models additionally trained on large amounts of code outperform the base models. On the other hand, we find no consistent benefit of additional math training or alignment tuning across various model families.

Read more

6/3/2024

How Does Code Pretraining Affect Language Model Task Performance?
Total Score

0

How Does Code Pretraining Affect Language Model Task Performance?

Jackson Petty, Sjoerd van Steenkiste, Tal Linzen

Large language models are increasingly trained on corpora containing both natural language and non-linguistic data like source code. Aside from aiding programming-related tasks, anecdotal evidence suggests that including code in pretraining corpora may improve performance on other, unrelated tasks, yet to date no work has been able to establish a causal connection by controlling between language and code data. Here we do just this. We pretrain language models on datasets which interleave natural language and code in two different settings: additive, in which the total volume of data seen during pretraining is held constant; and competitive, in which the volume of language data is held constant. We study how the pretraining mixture affects performance on (a) a diverse collection of tasks included in the BigBench benchmark, and (b) compositionality, measured by generalization accuracy on semantic parsing and syntactic transformations. We find that pretraining on higher proportions of code improves performance on compositional tasks involving structured output (like semantic parsing), and mathematics. Conversely, increase code mixture can harm performance on other tasks, including on tasks that requires sensitivity to linguistic structure such as syntax or morphology, and tasks measuring real-world knowledge.

Read more

9/10/2024

To Code, or Not To Code? Exploring Impact of Code in Pre-training
Total Score

430

To Code, or Not To Code? Exploring Impact of Code in Pre-training

Viraat Aryabumi, Yixuan Su, Raymond Ma, Adrien Morisot, Ivan Zhang, Acyr Locatelli, Marzieh Fadaee, Ahmet Ustun, Sara Hooker

Including code in the pre-training data mixture, even for models not specifically designed for code, has become a common practice in LLMs pre-training. While there has been anecdotal consensus among practitioners that code data plays a vital role in general LLMs' performance, there is only limited work analyzing the precise impact of code on non-code tasks. In this work, we systematically investigate the impact of code data on general performance. We ask what is the impact of code data used in pre-training on a large variety of downstream tasks beyond code generation. We conduct extensive ablations and evaluate across a broad range of natural language reasoning tasks, world knowledge tasks, code benchmarks, and LLM-as-a-judge win-rates for models with sizes ranging from 470M to 2.8B parameters. Across settings, we find a consistent results that code is a critical building block for generalization far beyond coding tasks and improvements to code quality have an outsized impact across all tasks. In particular, compared to text-only pre-training, the addition of code results in up to relative increase of 8.2% in natural language (NL) reasoning, 4.2% in world knowledge, 6.6% improvement in generative win-rates, and a 12x boost in code performance respectively. Our work suggests investments in code quality and preserving code during pre-training have positive impacts.

Read more

8/21/2024

Curriculum Learning for Small Code Language Models
Total Score

0

Curriculum Learning for Small Code Language Models

Marwa Nair, Kamel Yamani, Lynda Said Lhadj, Riyadh Baghdadi

Code language models have emerged as useful tools for various programming tasks, yet they often struggle when it comes to complex ones. In this paper, we explore the potential of curriculum learning in enhancing the performance of these models. While prior research has suggested that curriculum learning does not necessarily help in improving the performance of language models, our results surprisingly show that this may not be the case for code language models. We demonstrate that a well-designed curriculum learning approach significantly improves the accuracy of small decoder-only code language models on the task of code execution, while its effect on code completion is less significant. To explore the potential of curriculum learning, we train multiple GPT models with 1 million parameters each to predict the next token and evaluate them on code completion and execution tasks. Our contributions include proposing a novel code difficulty assessment metric by combining software code measures, investigating the effectiveness of Curriculum Learning for code language models, and introducing a Novel Curriculum Learning schedule that enhances the performance of small decoder-only language models in code execution tasks. The results of this paper open the door for more research on the use of curriculum learning for code language models.

Read more

7/16/2024