A computational model for gender asset gap management with a focus on gender disparity in land acquisition and land tenure security
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper presents a computational model for managing the gender asset gap, with a focus on gender disparities in land acquisition and land tenure security.
- The research aims to develop a framework for understanding and addressing the systemic barriers that contribute to the unequal distribution of land ownership and access between men and women.
- The paper explores historical measures of gender disparity in land-related assets and proposes a novel approach to modeling and mitigating these disparities.
Plain English Explanation
This research paper looks at the problem of the "gender asset gap" - the unequal distribution of valuable assets, like land, between men and women. The authors want to create a computer model that can help understand and address this issue, with a specific focus on land ownership and access.
Land is a critical asset that can provide economic security, social status, and political influence. However, in many parts of the world, women face significant barriers to acquiring and securely owning land, compared to men. This gender disparity in land rights is a major contributor to broader gender inequalities.
The researchers examine how this problem has been measured and studied in the past. They then propose a new way to model and manage the gender asset gap, with the goal of developing strategies to close the gap and ensure more equal access to land for both men and women.
By creating a computational model to analyze this complex issue, the researchers hope to provide policymakers, advocates, and communities with a tool to identify the root causes of gender disparities in land ownership and tenure security. This could then inform the development of more effective interventions and policies to address this pressing social and economic challenge.
Technical Explanation
The paper begins by reviewing the history of measures of gender disparity in land acquisition and land tenure security. The authors note that previous research has used a variety of metrics, such as the percentage of land owned by women, the gender gap in land ownership, and the security of women's land rights.
The core of the paper presents the authors' computational model for gender asset gap management. This model incorporates factors such as cultural norms, legal frameworks, economic conditions, and power dynamics that influence the distribution of land-based assets between men and women.
The model is designed to simulate the complex interplay of these factors and predict the long-term trajectories of gender disparities in land ownership and tenure security. By running various scenarios and testing different policy interventions, the researchers aim to identify the most effective approaches for reducing gender disparities in access to and control over land.
The authors also discuss the challenge of data scarcity and biases in the available data on land ownership and tenure, which can make it difficult to accurately model and measure gender disparities. They propose strategies for addressing these data-related issues, such as incorporating alternative data sources and developing more robust regional approaches to data collection and analysis.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a promising approach to addressing a critical issue of gender inequality, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research.
One key limitation is the inherent complexity of the factors that contribute to the gender asset gap, which can make it challenging to capture all relevant variables in a computational model. The authors recognize the need for ongoing refinement and validation of the model as new data and insights become available.
Additionally, the paper notes that the effectiveness of the proposed interventions may vary significantly across different cultural, legal, and economic contexts. This underscores the importance of tailoring solutions to the specific needs and realities of local communities.
Further research could explore the intersections between gender, land rights, and other forms of social and economic marginalization, such as race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status. This could help develop more comprehensive and equitable strategies for closing the gender asset gap.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel computational model for understanding and addressing the gender asset gap, with a focus on the critical issue of gender disparities in land acquisition and tenure security. By developing a framework for simulating the complex interplay of cultural, legal, economic, and political factors, the researchers aim to inform the design of more effective policies and interventions to promote gender equality in access to and control over land-based assets.
The research highlights the importance of addressing this persistent form of gender inequality, which has significant implications for economic empowerment, social status, and political influence. The authors' approach of combining computational modeling with a deep understanding of the historical and contextual factors shaping land rights could provide a valuable tool for policymakers, advocates, and communities working to build a more equitable and inclusive society.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
A computational model for gender asset gap management with a focus on gender disparity in land acquisition and land tenure security
Oluwatosin Ogundare, Lewis Njualem
Gender inequality is a significant concern in many cultures, as women face significant barriers to asset acquisition particularly land ownership and control. Land acquisition and land tenure security are complex issues that affect various cultural groups differently, leading to disparities in access and ownership especially when superimposed with other socio-economic issues like gender inequality. Measuring the severity of these issues across different cultural groups is challenging due to variations in cultural norms, expectations and effectiveness of the measurement framework to correctly assess the level of severity. While nominal measures of gender asset gap provide valuable insights into land acquisition and tenure security issues, they do not fully capture the nuances of cultural differences and the impact of governmental and corporate policies that influence gender disparity in land ownership and control. The proposed framework aims to fill this gap by incorporating cultural and policy factors in developing a new measurement framework equipped with a more robust, comprehensive metric to standardize the approach to assessing the severity of gender asset disparity in a general sense but with a focus on land acquisition and tenure security to engender more effective interventions and policy recommendations.
Read more4/16/2024
0
GenderCARE: A Comprehensive Framework for Assessing and Reducing Gender Bias in Large Language Models
Kunsheng Tang, Wenbo Zhou, Jie Zhang, Aishan Liu, Gelei Deng, Shuai Li, Peigui Qi, Weiming Zhang, Tianwei Zhang, Nenghai Yu
Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable capabilities in natural language generation, but they have also been observed to magnify societal biases, particularly those related to gender. In response to this issue, several benchmarks have been proposed to assess gender bias in LLMs. However, these benchmarks often lack practical flexibility or inadvertently introduce biases. To address these shortcomings, we introduce GenderCARE, a comprehensive framework that encompasses innovative Criteria, bias Assessment, Reduction techniques, and Evaluation metrics for quantifying and mitigating gender bias in LLMs. To begin, we establish pioneering criteria for gender equality benchmarks, spanning dimensions such as inclusivity, diversity, explainability, objectivity, robustness, and realisticity. Guided by these criteria, we construct GenderPair, a novel pair-based benchmark designed to assess gender bias in LLMs comprehensively. Our benchmark provides standardized and realistic evaluations, including previously overlooked gender groups such as transgender and non-binary individuals. Furthermore, we develop effective debiasing techniques that incorporate counterfactual data augmentation and specialized fine-tuning strategies to reduce gender bias in LLMs without compromising their overall performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate a significant reduction in various gender bias benchmarks, with reductions peaking at over 90% and averaging above 35% across 17 different LLMs. Importantly, these reductions come with minimal variability in mainstream language tasks, remaining below 2%. By offering a realistic assessment and tailored reduction of gender biases, we hope that our GenderCARE can represent a significant step towards achieving fairness and equity in LLMs. More details are available at https://github.com/kstanghere/GenderCARE-ccs24.
Read more8/23/2024
0
High-Impact Innovations and Hidden Gender Disparities in Inventor-Evaluator Networks
Tara Sowrirajan, Ryan Whalen, Brian Uzzi
We study of millions of scientific, technological, and artistic innovations and find that the innovation gap faced by women is far from universal. No gap exists for conventional innovations. Rather, the gap is pervasively rooted in innovations that combine ideas in unexpected ways - innovations most critical to scientific breakthroughs. Further, at the USPTO we find that female examiners reject up to 33 percent more unconventional innovations by women inventors than do male examiners, suggesting that gender discrimination weakly explains this innovation gap. Instead, new data indicate that a configuration of institutional practices explains the innovation gap. These practices compromise the expertise women examiners need to accurately assess unconventional innovations and then over-assign women examiners to women innovators, undermining women's innovations. These institutional impediments negatively impact innovation rates in science but have the virtue of being more amenable to actionable policy changes than does culturally ingrained gender discrimination.
Read more8/6/2024
🚀
0
Examining the Legal Status of Digital Assets as Property: A Comparative Analysis of Jurisdictional Approaches
Luke Lee
This paper examines the complex legal landscape surrounding digital assets, analysing how they are defined and regulated as property across various jurisdictions. As digital assets such as cryptocurrencies and non-fungible tokens (NFTs) increasingly integrate with global economies, their intangible nature presents unique challenges to traditional property law concepts, necessitating a re-evaluation of legal definitions and ownership frameworks. This research presents a comparative analysis, reviewing how different legal systems classify and manage digital assets within property law, highlighting the variations in regulatory approaches and their implications on ownership, transfer, and inheritance rights. By examining seminal cases and regulatory developments in major jurisdictions, including the United States, the European Union, and Singapore, this paper explores the emerging trends and potential legal evolutions that could influence the global handling of digital assets. The study aims to contribute to the scholarly discourse by proposing a harmonized approach to digital asset regulation, seeking to balance innovation with legal certainty and consumer protection.
Read more6/26/2024