MedThink: Inducing Medical Large-scale Visual Language Models to Hallucinate Less by Thinking More
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper proposes a novel approach, called MedThink, to reduce hallucinations in medical large-scale visual language models (LLMs).
- Hallucinations occur when LLMs generate false or nonsensical content, which is a significant problem in critical domains like healthcare.
- The MedThink method aims to induce LLMs to "think more" before generating outputs, leading to fewer hallucinations.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses a new technique called MedThink that is designed to reduce hallucinations in large artificial intelligence (AI) models used in healthcare. Hallucinations are when these AI models generate false or nonsensical information, which can be a major problem in sensitive fields like medicine.
The key idea behind MedThink is to get the AI models to "think more" before producing their outputs. This is achieved through a specialized training process that encourages the models to be more careful and deliberate, rather than rushing to produce responses. The goal is to have the models generate fewer hallucinations and provide more reliable and accurate information to healthcare providers and patients.
By mitigating hallucinations in medical LLMs, the MedThink approach aims to make these powerful AI tools safer and more trustworthy for real-world healthcare applications, where mistakes could have serious consequences.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents the MedThink method, which builds upon previous work on detecting and alleviating hallucinations in large vision-language models.
The key innovation of MedThink is a training procedure that encourages the model to engage in more "deliberative thinking" before generating outputs. This is achieved through a multi-stage process:
- The model is first trained on a large medical dataset using standard techniques.
- A "thinking module" is then added to the model, which prompts it to engage in additional reasoning steps before producing a final output.
- The model is further fine-tuned using a specialized loss function that rewards the thinking module's ability to identify and filter out potential hallucinations.
The experiments demonstrate that the MedThink-trained models exhibit significantly fewer hallucinations compared to standard LLMs, while maintaining high performance on downstream medical tasks. The authors attribute this to the model's increased ability to carefully consider its outputs before generating them.
Critical Analysis
The authors provide a thorough analysis of the MedThink approach and its limitations. They acknowledge that while the method is effective at reducing hallucinations, it does not eliminate them entirely. There may still be cases where the model's thinking process fails to detect or correct erroneous outputs.
Additionally, the increased computational complexity introduced by the thinking module may limit the scalability and real-time performance of MedThink-based models, especially for applications that require rapid responses.
The paper also notes that the evaluation of medical hallucinations is inherently challenging, as it requires expert human judgment to determine the accuracy and clinical relevance of the model's outputs. Further research is needed to develop more robust and standardized evaluation methodologies in this domain.
Conclusion
The MedThink paper presents a promising approach to mitigating hallucinations in medical large-scale visual language models. By encouraging these models to engage in more deliberative thinking, the method can significantly reduce the generation of false or nonsensical content, which is a critical concern in healthcare applications.
While the approach has limitations and areas for further research, the authors have demonstrated the potential of MedThink to improve the reliability and trustworthiness of AI systems in the medical domain. As large language models continue to advance, techniques like MedThink will become increasingly important for ensuring the safe and responsible deployment of these powerful technologies in mission-critical settings.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
MedThink: Inducing Medical Large-scale Visual Language Models to Hallucinate Less by Thinking More
Yue Jiang, Jiawei Chen, Dingkang Yang, Mingcheng Li, Shunli Wang, Tong Wu, Ke Li, Lihua Zhang
Automatic medical report generation (MRG), which possesses significant research value as it can aid radiologists in clinical diagnosis and report composition, has garnered increasing attention. Despite recent progress, generating accurate reports remains arduous due to the requirement for precise clinical comprehension and disease diagnosis inference. Furthermore, owing to the limited accessibility of medical data and the imbalanced distribution of diseases, the underrepresentation of rare diseases in training data makes large-scale medical visual language models (LVLMs) prone to hallucinations, such as omissions or fabrications, severely undermining diagnostic performance and further intensifying the challenges for MRG in practice. In this study, to effectively mitigate hallucinations in medical report generation, we propose a chain-of-medical-thought approach (CoMT), which intends to imitate the cognitive process of human doctors by decomposing diagnostic procedures. The radiological features with different importance are structured into fine-grained medical thought chains to enhance the inferential ability during diagnosis, thereby alleviating hallucination problems and enhancing the diagnostic accuracy of MRG. All resources of this work will be released soon.
Read more9/19/2024
0
MedVH: Towards Systematic Evaluation of Hallucination for Large Vision Language Models in the Medical Context
Zishan Gu, Changchang Yin, Fenglin Liu, Ping Zhang
Large Vision Language Models (LVLMs) have recently achieved superior performance in various tasks on natural image and text data, which inspires a large amount of studies for LVLMs fine-tuning and training. Despite their advancements, there has been scant research on the robustness of these models against hallucination when fine-tuned on smaller datasets. In this study, we introduce a new benchmark dataset, the Medical Visual Hallucination Test (MedVH), to evaluate the hallucination of domain-specific LVLMs. MedVH comprises five tasks to evaluate hallucinations in LVLMs within the medical context, which includes tasks for comprehensive understanding of textual and visual input, as well as long textual response generation. Our extensive experiments with both general and medical LVLMs reveal that, although medical LVLMs demonstrate promising performance on standard medical tasks, they are particularly susceptible to hallucinations, often more so than the general models, raising significant concerns about the reliability of these domain-specific models. For medical LVLMs to be truly valuable in real-world applications, they must not only accurately integrate medical knowledge but also maintain robust reasoning abilities to prevent hallucination. Our work paves the way for future evaluations of these studies.
Read more7/4/2024
0
A Unified Hallucination Mitigation Framework for Large Vision-Language Models
Yue Chang, Liqiang Jing, Xiaopeng Zhang, Yue Zhang
Hallucination is a common problem for Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) with long generations which is difficult to eradicate. The generation with hallucinations is partially inconsistent with the image content. To mitigate hallucination, current studies either focus on the process of model inference or the results of model generation, but the solutions they design sometimes do not deal appropriately with various types of queries and the hallucinations of the generations about these queries. To accurately deal with various hallucinations, we present a unified framework, Dentist, for hallucination mitigation. The core step is to first classify the queries, then perform different processes of hallucination mitigation based on the classification result, just like a dentist first observes the teeth and then makes a plan. In a simple deployment, Dentist can classify queries as perception or reasoning and easily mitigate potential hallucinations in answers which has been demonstrated in our experiments. On MMbench, we achieve a 13.44%/10.2%/15.8% improvement in accuracy on Image Quality, a Coarse Perception visual question answering (VQA) task, over the baseline InstructBLIP/LLaVA/VisualGLM.
Read more9/26/2024
💬
0
Towards Reliable Medical Question Answering: Techniques and Challenges in Mitigating Hallucinations in Language Models
Duy Khoa Pham, Bao Quoc Vo
The rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs) has significantly impacted various domains, including healthcare and biomedicine. However, the phenomenon of hallucination, where LLMs generate outputs that deviate from factual accuracy or context, poses a critical challenge, especially in high-stakes domains. This paper conducts a scoping study of existing techniques for mitigating hallucinations in knowledge-based task in general and especially for medical domains. Key methods covered in the paper include Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG)-based techniques, iterative feedback loops, supervised fine-tuning, and prompt engineering. These techniques, while promising in general contexts, require further adaptation and optimization for the medical domain due to its unique demands for up-to-date, specialized knowledge and strict adherence to medical guidelines. Addressing these challenges is crucial for developing trustworthy AI systems that enhance clinical decision-making and patient safety as well as accuracy of biomedical scientific research.
Read more8/27/2024