Explainable AI for engineering design: A unified approach of systems engineering and component-based deep learning

Overview

• Machine learning models are becoming increasingly important in design and engineering fields
• These data-driven models have high potential to help create novel, high-performing, and sustainable artifacts
• However, they often suffer from limited generalization and lack of explainability, hindering their reusability

Plain English Explanation

Machine learning models have become very powerful tools in design and engineering. They can help create new and improved products and systems by learning from data. However, these "black-box" models often struggle to generalize beyond the data they were trained on, and it can be difficult to understand how they arrive at their outputs. This makes it hard to reuse and trust these models.

To address this, the researchers propose a "component-based" approach that aligns deep learning with traditional systems engineering methods. The key idea is to break down the problem into interpretable engineering components and have the deep neural network model the interactions between these components. This allows the model to be more transparent and explainable, while still benefiting from the power of machine learning.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed a component-based modeling approach that combines deep learning with systems engineering principles. The main idea is to break down the overall system into individual components, each with its own machine learning model. These component models are then connected through their interfaces, forming a hierarchical deep neural network.

The key advantage of this approach is that the activations at the component interfaces represent interpretable engineering quantities. This means the inner workings of the deep neural network can be directly related to the underlying physical system, making the model more explainable and reusable.

The researchers evaluated their approach in the domain of energy-efficient building design. They found that the component-based method showed better generalization performance compared to conventional monolithic models, especially for structurally different building designs. Additionally, they demonstrated how the sensitivity information from systems engineering and insights from decision trees can be used to explain the model's predictions.

Critical Analysis

The researchers provide a compelling approach to improving the explainability and reusability of data-driven models in engineering applications. By aligning the deep learning model with the underlying systems engineering principles, they are able to create a more transparent and interpretable model.

One potential limitation is that the component-based approach may require more upfront effort to define the appropriate component structure and interfaces. This could be a barrier to adoption, especially in cases where the system is highly complex or not well-understood.

Additionally, the researchers focused their evaluation on the domain of building energy design. While this is an important application, it would be valuable to see how the approach performs in other engineering domains to assess its broader applicability.

Conclusion

The component-based approach proposed in this paper represents a promising step towards making data-driven models more explainable and reusable in engineering and design. By aligning deep learning with systems engineering principles, the researchers have developed a method that can provide better generalization and more interpretable insights, which could lead to more trust and adoption of these powerful modeling techniques.