Language Fairness in Multilingual Information Retrieval
0
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper examines the issue of language fairness in multilingual information retrieval systems.
- The researchers investigate whether these systems exhibit biases towards certain languages and how to mitigate such biases.
- They propose a statistical testing framework to assess language fairness and demonstrate its application on several real-world datasets.
Plain English Explanation
Information retrieval systems, such as search engines, are often designed to work with multiple languages. However, these multilingual systems may inadvertently favor some languages over others, leading to unfair results for users of certain languages. This paper explores this problem of "language fairness" and proposes a way to measure and address it.
The researchers developed a statistical testing framework to evaluate whether a multilingual information retrieval system is treating all languages fairly. This involves comparing the retrieval performance for different languages and determining if any significant differences exist. By applying this framework to real-world datasets, the researchers were able to identify cases where certain languages were disadvantaged compared to others.
Understanding and addressing language fairness is important to ensure that users of different languages have equal access to information and that no group is unfairly marginalized. This work contributes a useful tool for developers of multilingual systems to assess and improve the fairness of their systems.
Technical Explanation
The paper proposes a statistical testing framework to assess language fairness in multilingual information retrieval systems. The key steps of the framework are:
- Metric Calculation: The researchers compute standard information retrieval metrics, such as Precision@K and Normalized Discounted Cumulative Gain (NDCG), for each language in the system.
- Statistical Testing: They then perform statistical tests, such as the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, to determine if the metric values for different languages are significantly different.
- Fairness Evaluation: Based on the statistical test results, the researchers determine whether the system exhibits language fairness or unfairness.
The framework is evaluated on several real-world multilingual datasets, including CLEF and TREC collections. The results show that the tested systems exhibit varying degrees of language unfairness, with some languages performing significantly better than others.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a robust statistical approach to assessing language fairness in multilingual information retrieval systems. However, the authors acknowledge that their framework has some limitations. For instance, the choice of evaluation metrics and statistical tests may impact the fairness assessment, and the framework does not provide guidance on how to address identified unfairness.
Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential causes of language unfairness, such as differences in language resources, query formulation, or retrieval algorithm biases. Further research is needed to understand the underlying factors contributing to unfairness and develop more comprehensive solutions to address the trade-off between fair representations.
Conclusion
This paper presents a novel statistical framework for assessing language fairness in multilingual information retrieval systems. By applying this framework to real-world datasets, the researchers were able to identify cases of language unfairness, where certain languages performed significantly worse than others.
The work highlights the importance of ensuring language fairness in multilingual systems to provide equitable access to information for users of different languages. The proposed framework can be a valuable tool for system developers to evaluate and improve the fairness of their multilingual retrieval systems, contributing to more inclusive and accessible information retrieval.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
0
Language Fairness in Multilingual Information Retrieval
Eugene Yang, Thomas Janich, James Mayfield, Dawn Lawrie
Multilingual information retrieval (MLIR) considers the problem of ranking documents in several languages for a query expressed in a language that may differ from any of those languages. Recent work has observed that approaches such as combining ranked lists representing a single document language each or using multilingual pretrained language models demonstrate a preference for one language over others. This results in systematic unfair treatment of documents in different languages. This work proposes a language fairness metric to evaluate whether documents across different languages are fairly ranked through statistical equivalence testing using the Kruskal-Wallis test. In contrast to most prior work in group fairness, we do not consider any language to be an unprotected group. Thus our proposed measure, PEER (Probability of EqualExpected Rank), is the first fairness metric specifically designed to capture the language fairness of MLIR systems. We demonstrate the behavior of PEER on artificial ranked lists. We also evaluate real MLIR systems on two publicly available benchmarks and show that the PEER scores align with prior analytical findings on MLIR fairness. Our implementation is compatible with ir-measures and is available at http://github.com/hltcoe/peer_measure.
Read more5/3/2024
0
Do Large Language Models Rank Fairly? An Empirical Study on the Fairness of LLMs as Rankers
Yuan Wang, Xuyang Wu, Hsin-Tai Wu, Zhiqiang Tao, Yi Fang
The integration of Large Language Models (LLMs) in information retrieval has raised a critical reevaluation of fairness in the text-ranking models. LLMs, such as GPT models and Llama2, have shown effectiveness in natural language understanding tasks, and prior works (e.g., RankGPT) have also demonstrated that the LLMs exhibit better performance than the traditional ranking models in the ranking task. However, their fairness remains largely unexplored. This paper presents an empirical study evaluating these LLMs using the TREC Fair Ranking dataset, focusing on the representation of binary protected attributes such as gender and geographic location, which are historically underrepresented in search outcomes. Our analysis delves into how these LLMs handle queries and documents related to these attributes, aiming to uncover biases in their ranking algorithms. We assess fairness from both user and content perspectives, contributing an empirical benchmark for evaluating LLMs as the fair ranker.
Read more6/27/2024
0
Quantifying Multilingual Performance of Large Language Models Across Languages
Zihao Li, Yucheng Shi, Zirui Liu, Fan Yang, Ali Payani, Ninghao Liu, Mengnan Du
The development of Large Language Models (LLMs) relies on extensive text corpora, which are often unevenly distributed across languages. This imbalance results in LLMs performing significantly better on high-resource languages like English, German, and French, while their capabilities in low-resource languages remain inadequate. Currently, there is a lack of quantitative methods to evaluate the performance of LLMs in these low-resource languages. To address this gap, we propose the Language Ranker, an intrinsic metric designed to benchmark and rank languages based on LLM performance using internal representations. By comparing the LLM's internal representation of various languages against a baseline derived from English, we can assess the model's multilingual capabilities in a robust and language-agnostic manner. Our analysis reveals that high-resource languages exhibit higher similarity scores with English, demonstrating superior performance, while low-resource languages show lower similarity scores, underscoring the effectiveness of our metric in assessing language-specific capabilities. Besides, the experiments show that there is a strong correlation between the LLM's performance in different languages and the proportion of those languages in its pre-training corpus. These insights underscore the efficacy of the Language Ranker as a tool for evaluating LLM performance across different languages, particularly those with limited resources.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Era
Sunhao Dai, Chen Xu, Shicheng Xu, Liang Pang, Zhenhua Dong, Jun Xu
With the rapid advancements of large language models (LLMs), information retrieval (IR) systems, such as search engines and recommender systems, have undergone a significant paradigm shift. This evolution, while heralding new opportunities, introduces emerging challenges, particularly in terms of biases and unfairness, which may threaten the information ecosystem. In this paper, we present a comprehensive survey of existing works on emerging and pressing bias and unfairness issues in IR systems when the integration of LLMs. We first unify bias and unfairness issues as distribution mismatch problems, providing a groundwork for categorizing various mitigation strategies through distribution alignment. Subsequently, we systematically delve into the specific bias and unfairness issues arising from three critical stages of LLMs integration into IR systems: data collection, model development, and result evaluation. In doing so, we meticulously review and analyze recent literature, focusing on the definitions, characteristics, and corresponding mitigation strategies associated with these issues. Finally, we identify and highlight some open problems and challenges for future work, aiming to inspire researchers and stakeholders in the IR field and beyond to better understand and mitigate bias and unfairness issues of IR in this LLM era. We also consistently maintain a GitHub repository for the relevant papers and resources in this rising direction at https://github.com/KID-22/LLM-IR-Bias-Fairness-Survey.
Read more8/22/2024