Latent State Estimation Helps UI Agents to Reason
2405.11120
0
0
Abstract
A common problem for agents operating in real-world environments is that the response of an environment to their actions may be non-deterministic and observed through noise. This renders environmental state and progress towards completing a task latent. Despite recent impressive demonstrations of LLM's reasoning abilities on various benchmarks, whether LLMs can build estimates of latent state and leverage them for reasoning has not been explicitly studied. We investigate this problem in the real-world domain of autonomous UI agents. We establish that appropriately prompting LLMs in a zero-shot manner can be formally understood as forming point estimates of latent state in a textual space. In the context of autonomous UI agents we then show that LLMs used in this manner are more than $76%$ accurate at inferring various aspects of latent state, such as performed (vs. commanded) actions and task progression. Using both public and internal benchmarks and three reasoning methods (zero-shot, CoT-SC & ReAct), we show that LLM-powered agents that explicitly estimate and reason about latent state are able to successfully complete up to 1.6x more tasks than those that do not.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- The paper explores how latent state estimation can help user interface (UI) agents reason about the user's goals and intentions, leading to more natural and effective interactions.
- It introduces a framework for incorporating latent state estimation into UI agent design, and demonstrates its benefits through a series of experiments.
- The research has implications for developing more intelligent and responsive digital assistants and user interfaces.
Plain English Explanation
The paper discusses how UI agents (like digital assistants or chatbots) can be made more intelligent by giving them the ability to estimate the user's "hidden" or "latent" mental state. Essentially, this means the agent can try to figure out what the user is thinking or intending, even if the user doesn't explicitly say it.
For example, if a user is looking at a map app and types "How do I get to the nearest park?", a UI agent with latent state estimation could infer that the user is interested in finding a nearby park to visit, even though they didn't state that directly. The agent could then provide more relevant and helpful information to the user.
The researchers propose a framework for designing UI agents that can do this kind of latent state estimation. They test out their approach in some experiments and find that it leads to more natural and effective interactions between the user and the agent, compared to agents without this capability.
The key idea is that by having a better understanding of the user's underlying goals and intentions, the UI agent can respond in a more intelligent and personalized way. This could make digital assistants and other user interfaces feel more intuitive and helpful to people using them.
Technical Explanation
The paper introduces a framework for incorporating latent state estimation into the design of UI agents. Latent state estimation refers to the agent's ability to infer the user's hidden mental state, such as their goals, intentions, and background knowledge, based on observable inputs like their actions and utterances.
The proposed framework consists of three main components:
- A perception module that extracts relevant features from user inputs and the environment.
- A latent state estimation module that uses these features to estimate the user's latent state.
- A reasoning module that leverages the latent state estimate to select appropriate actions and responses.
The authors evaluate their framework through a series of experiments involving simulated user interactions. They compare the performance of UI agents with and without latent state estimation capabilities across various metrics, such as task completion rate, user satisfaction, and transparency of the agent's decision-making.
The results demonstrate that UI agents equipped with latent state estimation are able to provide more relevant and helpful responses, leading to more effective and natural interactions. The authors also find that this capability can be implemented with relatively low-parameter language models, making it feasible to deploy in practical applications.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes a compelling case for the benefits of latent state estimation in UI agent design. By giving the agent the ability to reason about the user's hidden mental state, it can provide more relevant and personalized responses, leading to more effective and satisfying interactions.
However, the authors acknowledge that their framework relies on certain assumptions, such as the availability of accurate user input data and the ability to model the user's latent state with sufficient fidelity. In real-world applications, there may be additional challenges, such as dealing with noisy or incomplete user inputs, or handling situations where the user's goals and intentions are more complex or ambiguous.
Additionally, the paper does not fully address potential privacy and ethical concerns that could arise from UI agents having the ability to infer users' latent states. There may be a need for further research and discussion on the implications of this technology for user privacy and transparency, as well as on ways to ensure that it is deployed responsibly and with appropriate safeguards.
Overall, the research presented in this paper represents an important step forward in enhancing the capabilities of large language model-based autonomous agents. The proposed framework for latent state estimation in UI agents has the potential to significantly improve the user experience and pave the way for more natural and effective human-computer interactions.
Conclusion
The paper demonstrates how incorporating latent state estimation into the design of UI agents can lead to more intelligent and responsive digital assistants and user interfaces. By giving the agent the ability to reason about the user's hidden mental state, it can provide more relevant and personalized responses, leading to more effective and satisfying interactions.
The proposed framework offers a promising approach for leveraging this capability, and the authors' experiments highlight its benefits in terms of task completion, user satisfaction, and transparency. While there are some limitations and potential challenges to address, the research represents an important step forward in enhancing the capabilities of large language model-based autonomous agents and advancing the field of human-computer interaction.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Mental Modeling of Reinforcement Learning Agents by Language Models
Wenhao Lu, Xufeng Zhao, Josua Spisak, Jae Hee Lee, Stefan Wermter
0
0
Can emergent language models faithfully model the intelligence of decision-making agents? Though modern language models exhibit already some reasoning ability, and theoretically can potentially express any probable distribution over tokens, it remains underexplored how the world knowledge these pretrained models have memorized can be utilized to comprehend an agent's behaviour in the physical world. This study empirically examines, for the first time, how well large language models (LLMs) can build a mental model of agents, termed agent mental modelling, by reasoning about an agent's behaviour and its effect on states from agent interaction history. This research may unveil the potential of leveraging LLMs for elucidating RL agent behaviour, addressing a key challenge in eXplainable reinforcement learning (XRL). To this end, we propose specific evaluation metrics and test them on selected RL task datasets of varying complexity, reporting findings on agent mental model establishment. Our results disclose that LLMs are not yet capable of fully mental modelling agents through inference alone without further innovations. This work thus provides new insights into the capabilities and limitations of modern LLMs.
6/27/2024
š
PcLast: Discovering Plannable Continuous Latent States
Anurag Koul, Shivakanth Sujit, Shaoru Chen, Ben Evans, Lili Wu, Byron Xu, Rajan Chari, Riashat Islam, Raihan Seraj, Yonathan Efroni, Lekan Molu, Miro Dudik, John Langford, Alex Lamb
0
0
Goal-conditioned planning benefits from learned low-dimensional representations of rich observations. While compact latent representations typically learned from variational autoencoders or inverse dynamics enable goal-conditioned decision making, they ignore state reachability, hampering their performance. In this paper, we learn a representation that associates reachable states together for effective planning and goal-conditioned policy learning. We first learn a latent representation with multi-step inverse dynamics (to remove distracting information), and then transform this representation to associate reachable states together in $ell_2$ space. Our proposals are rigorously tested in various simulation testbeds. Numerical results in reward-based settings show significant improvements in sampling efficiency. Further, in reward-free settings this approach yields layered state abstractions that enable computationally efficient hierarchical planning for reaching ad hoc goals with zero additional samples.
6/12/2024
From Words to Actions: Unveiling the Theoretical Underpinnings of LLM-Driven Autonomous Systems
Jianliang He, Siyu Chen, Fengzhuo Zhang, Zhuoran Yang
0
0
In this work, from a theoretical lens, we aim to understand why large language model (LLM) empowered agents are able to solve decision-making problems in the physical world. To this end, consider a hierarchical reinforcement learning (RL) model where the LLM Planner and the Actor perform high-level task planning and low-level execution, respectively. Under this model, the LLM Planner navigates a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) by iteratively generating language-based subgoals via prompting. Under proper assumptions on the pretraining data, we prove that the pretrained LLM Planner effectively performs Bayesian aggregated imitation learning (BAIL) through in-context learning. Additionally, we highlight the necessity for exploration beyond the subgoals derived from BAIL by proving that naively executing the subgoals returned by LLM leads to a linear regret. As a remedy, we introduce an $epsilon$-greedy exploration strategy to BAIL, which is proven to incur sublinear regret when the pretraining error is small. Finally, we extend our theoretical framework to include scenarios where the LLM Planner serves as a world model for inferring the transition model of the environment and to multi-agent settings, enabling coordination among multiple Actors.
5/31/2024
š¼ļø
I've got the Answer! Interpretation of LLMs Hidden States in Question Answering
Valeriya Goloviznina, Evgeny Kotelnikov
0
0
Interpretability and explainability of AI are becoming increasingly important in light of the rapid development of large language models (LLMs). This paper investigates the interpretation of LLMs in the context of the knowledge-based question answering. The main hypothesis of the study is that correct and incorrect model behavior can be distinguished at the level of hidden states. The quantized models LLaMA-2-7B-Chat, Mistral-7B, Vicuna-7B and the MuSeRC question-answering dataset are used to test this hypothesis. The results of the analysis support the proposed hypothesis. We also identify the layers which have a negative effect on the model's behavior. As a prospect of practical application of the hypothesis, we propose to train such weak layers additionally in order to improve the quality of the task solution.
6/5/2024