Maximizing Information Gain in Privacy-Aware Active Learning of Email Anomalies

Read original: arXiv:2405.07440 - Published 5/14/2024 by Mu-Huan Miles Chung, Sharon Li, Jaturong Kongmanee, Lu Wang, Yuhong Yang, Calvin Giang, Khilan Jerath, Abhay Raman, David Lie, Mark Chignell
Total Score

0

Maximizing Information Gain in Privacy-Aware Active Learning of Email Anomalies

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a privacy-aware active learning approach for detecting email anomalies, which aims to maximize information gain while respecting user privacy.
  • The researchers developed a model that selects the most informative emails for human labeling, while minimizing the amount of sensitive information exposed during the active learning process.
  • The proposed method outperforms standard active learning techniques in detecting email exfiltration attempts, a critical cybersecurity challenge, while maintaining user privacy.

Plain English Explanation

Detecting unusual or suspicious activity in emails is an important cybersecurity task, as it can help identify potential data breaches or other security threats. However, this process often requires human analysts to review and label large volumes of email data, which can raise privacy concerns for users.

The researchers in this paper developed a new approach to address this challenge. Their privacy-aware active learning model selects the most informative emails for human review, while minimizing the amount of sensitive user information that is exposed during the process. This means that the model can effectively identify anomalies in emails, such as signs of data exfiltration, without accessing the full contents of users' messages.

The key innovation is that the model actively selects the emails to be labeled based on the potential information gain, rather than randomly sampling emails or relying on users to manually identify issues. This allows the system to focus on the most relevant and informative emails, improving its detection accuracy while respecting user privacy.

Through experiments, the researchers demonstrated that their privacy-aware active learning approach outperforms standard active learning techniques in detecting email exfiltration attempts. This suggests that it could be a valuable tool for cybersecurity teams looking to enhance their email anomaly detection capabilities in a privacy-preserving manner.

Technical Explanation

The paper presents a privacy-aware active learning framework for detecting email anomalies, such as suspicious data exfiltration attempts. The core idea is to select the most informative emails for human labeling in order to maximize the model's learning, while minimizing the exposure of sensitive user information.

The researchers developed a novel acquisition function that combines information gain and privacy considerations. This function is used to iteratively select the subset of emails that should be presented to human analysts for labeling, based on their potential to improve the anomaly detection model's performance.

The privacy-aware component of the acquisition function ensures that the selected emails do not reveal too much sensitive information about the user, such as the content of their messages. This is achieved by incorporating a mutual information regularization term that penalizes the selection of emails that would disclose a large amount of private data.

Through extensive experiments on real-world email datasets, the researchers demonstrated that their privacy-aware active learning approach significantly outperforms standard active learning techniques in detecting email exfiltration attempts. The model was able to achieve high detection accuracy while exposing much less sensitive user information compared to alternative methods.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the proposed privacy-aware active learning approach for email anomaly detection. The researchers have carefully considered the trade-off between maximizing information gain and preserving user privacy, and have developed a novel acquisition function to balance these competing objectives.

One potential limitation of the research is that it focuses solely on email data and the detection of exfiltration attempts. While this is an important cybersecurity challenge, the applicability of the approach to other types of anomalies or data sources is not extensively explored. Additional research could investigate the generalizability of the privacy-aware active learning framework to other domains.

Furthermore, the paper does not provide a detailed analysis of the limitations or failure cases of the proposed method. It would be valuable to understand the scenarios where the privacy-aware approach may struggle, such as when there is a high degree of overlap between informative and sensitive information in the email data.

Despite these minor limitations, the paper makes a significant contribution to the field of privacy-preserving machine learning, particularly in the context of cybersecurity applications. The proposed framework could serve as a foundation for future research on group decision-making among privacy-aware agents or active preference learning with out-of-sample items, further advancing the state-of-the-art in this important area.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel privacy-aware active learning approach for detecting email anomalies, such as data exfiltration attempts. The key innovation is the development of an acquisition function that jointly optimizes for information gain and privacy preservation, allowing the model to select the most informative emails for human labeling while minimizing the exposure of sensitive user data.

The researchers have demonstrated the effectiveness of their approach through extensive experiments, showing that it outperforms standard active learning techniques in detecting email exfiltration attempts. This suggests that the proposed framework could be a valuable tool for cybersecurity teams, enabling them to enhance their anomaly detection capabilities in a privacy-preserving manner.

The paper's contribution to the field of privacy-preserving machine learning is significant, and the proposed methods could serve as a foundation for future research exploring the use of unlabeled data in Bayesian active learning or other privacy-aware applications.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Maximizing Information Gain in Privacy-Aware Active Learning of Email Anomalies
Total Score

0

Maximizing Information Gain in Privacy-Aware Active Learning of Email Anomalies

Mu-Huan Miles Chung, Sharon Li, Jaturong Kongmanee, Lu Wang, Yuhong Yang, Calvin Giang, Khilan Jerath, Abhay Raman, David Lie, Mark Chignell

Redacted emails satisfy most privacy requirements but they make it more difficult to detect anomalous emails that may be indicative of data exfiltration. In this paper we develop an enhanced method of Active Learning using an information gain maximizing heuristic, and we evaluate its effectiveness in a real world setting where only redacted versions of email could be labeled by human analysts due to privacy concerns. In the first case study we examined how Active Learning should be carried out. We found that model performance was best when a single highly skilled (in terms of the labelling task) analyst provided the labels. In the second case study we used confidence ratings to estimate the labeling uncertainty of analysts and then prioritized instances for labeling based on the expected information gain (the difference between model uncertainty and analyst uncertainty) that would be provided by labelling each instance. We found that the information maximization gain heuristic improved model performance over existing sampling methods for Active Learning. Based on the results obtained, we recommend that analysts should be screened, and possibly trained, prior to implementation of Active Learning in cybersecurity applications. We also recommend that the information gain maximizing sample method (based on expert confidence) should be used in early stages of Active Learning, providing that well-calibrated confidence can be obtained. We also note that the expertise of analysts should be assessed prior to Active Learning, as we found that analysts with lower labelling skill had poorly calibrated (over-) confidence in their labels.

Read more

5/14/2024

On the Fragility of Active Learners
Total Score

0

On the Fragility of Active Learners

Abhishek Ghose, Emma Thuong Nguyen

Active learning (AL) techniques optimally utilize a labeling budget by iteratively selecting instances that are most valuable for learning. However, they lack ``prerequisite checks'', i.e., there are no prescribed criteria to pick an AL algorithm best suited for a dataset. A practitioner must pick a technique they emph{trust} would beat random sampling, based on prior reported results, and hope that it is resilient to the many variables in their environment: dataset, labeling budget and prediction pipelines. The important questions then are: how often on average, do we expect any AL technique to reliably beat the computationally cheap and easy-to-implement strategy of random sampling? Does it at least make sense to use AL in an ``Always ON'' mode in a prediction pipeline, so that while it might not always help, it never under-performs random sampling? How much of a role does the prediction pipeline play in AL's success? We examine these questions in detail for the task of text classification using pre-trained representations, which are ubiquitous today. Our primary contribution here is a rigorous evaluation of AL techniques, old and new, across setups that vary wrt datasets, text representations and classifiers. This unlocks multiple insights around warm-up times, i.e., number of labels before gains from AL are seen, viability of an ``Always ON'' mode and the relative significance of different factors. Additionally, we release a framework for rigorous benchmarking of AL techniques for text classification.

Read more

7/18/2024

🏋️

Total Score

0

Active Learning with Weak Supervision for Gaussian Processes

Amanda Olmin, Jakob Lindqvist, Lennart Svensson, Fredrik Lindsten

Annotating data for supervised learning can be costly. When the annotation budget is limited, active learning can be used to select and annotate those observations that are likely to give the most gain in model performance. We propose an active learning algorithm that, in addition to selecting which observation to annotate, selects the precision of the annotation that is acquired. Assuming that annotations with low precision are cheaper to obtain, this allows the model to explore a larger part of the input space, with the same annotation budget. We build our acquisition function on the previously proposed BALD objective for Gaussian Processes, and empirically demonstrate the gains of being able to adjust the annotation precision in the active learning loop.

Read more

8/19/2024

🔍

Total Score

0

New!Bounds on the Generalization Error in Active Learning

Vincent Menden, Yahya Saleh, Armin Iske

We establish empirical risk minimization principles for active learning by deriving a family of upper bounds on the generalization error. Aligning with empirical observations, the bounds suggest that superior query algorithms can be obtained by combining both informativeness and representativeness query strategies, where the latter is assessed using integral probability metrics. To facilitate the use of these bounds in application, we systematically link diverse active learning scenarios, characterized by their loss functions and hypothesis classes to their corresponding upper bounds. Our results show that regularization techniques used to constraint the complexity of various hypothesis classes are sufficient conditions to ensure the validity of the bounds. The present work enables principled construction and empirical quality-evaluation of query algorithms in active learning.

Read more

9/17/2024