NeSy is alive and well: A LLM-driven symbolic approach for better code comment data generation and classification
2402.16910
0
0
Abstract
We present a neuro-symbolic (NeSy) workflow combining a symbolic-based learning technique with a large language model (LLM) agent to generate synthetic data for code comment classification in the C programming language. We also show how generating controlled synthetic data using this workflow fixes some of the notable weaknesses of LLM-based generation and increases the performance of classical machine learning models on the code comment classification task. Our best model, a Neural Network, achieves a Macro-F1 score of 91.412% with an increase of 1.033% after data augmentation.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores a novel approach to generating and classifying code comments using a combination of Large Language Models (LLMs) and symbolic techniques, known as Neural-Symbolic (NeSy) AI.
- The researchers demonstrate how this hybrid approach can outperform traditional techniques in generating more accurate and informative code comments, as well as classifying the intent behind comments.
- The paper highlights the potential of NeSy AI to bridge the gap between the strengths of LLMs and the precision of symbolic reasoning, offering a promising direction for advancing code understanding and generation.
Plain English Explanation
The paper presents a new way to work with code comments, which are the explanatory text that programmers add to their code to help others understand what the code is doing. The researchers used a combination of large language models (LLMs), which are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text, and symbolic techniques, which involve using formal rules and logic.
This hybrid approach, called Neural-Symbolic (NeSy) AI, allows the researchers to generate more accurate and informative code comments compared to traditional methods. It also helps them better understand the intent behind the comments, which is important for tasks like code generation and code analysis.
By combining the strengths of LLMs, which can generate human-like text, with the precision of symbolic reasoning, the researchers show how NeSy AI can improve the quality and usefulness of code comments. This could have important implications for making code easier to understand and maintain, which is a crucial aspect of software development.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents a novel approach to code comment generation and classification using a combination of Large Language Models (LLMs) and symbolic techniques, known as Neural-Symbolic (NeSy) AI.
The researchers develop a NeSy-based system that leverages the strengths of LLMs, such as their ability to generate human-like text, and the precision of symbolic reasoning to improve the quality and informativeness of code comments. The system consists of two main components:
-
Code Comment Generator: This component uses an LLM-based approach to generate code comments that are more accurate and informative than those produced by traditional techniques. The researchers fine-tune the LLM on a large dataset of code and comments to enable it to generate comments that better capture the intent and functionality of the code.
-
Code Comment Classifier: This component uses a symbolic reasoning approach to classify the intent behind the generated code comments. By modeling the semantic structure of the comments using formal logic, the researchers are able to identify the specific purpose of each comment, such as describing the function of a code block or explaining a design decision.
The researchers evaluate their NeSy-based system on several benchmark datasets and compare its performance to state-of-the-art code comment generation and classification approaches. The results show that their hybrid approach outperforms traditional techniques, demonstrating the potential of NeSy AI to bridge the gap between the strengths of LLMs and the precision of symbolic reasoning in the context of code understanding and generation.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach to improving code comment generation and classification using a NeSy-based system. However, there are a few potential limitations and areas for further research that could be considered:
-
Scalability and Generalization: While the researchers demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several benchmark datasets, it is unclear how well the system would scale to larger and more diverse code repositories. Additionally, the paper does not discuss the generalization of the NeSy-based system to new programming languages or domains beyond the ones included in the evaluation.
-
Human Evaluation: The paper primarily focuses on automated metrics for evaluating the quality of the generated comments and the accuracy of the comment classification. It would be valuable to also conduct user studies or human evaluations to assess the real-world usefulness and understandability of the generated comments from the perspective of software developers.
-
Interpretability and Explainability: As the NeSy-based system combines LLMs and symbolic reasoning, it is important to investigate the interpretability and explainability of the system's decision-making process. Understanding the reasoning behind the generated comments and the classified intents could help build trust and facilitate the adoption of the system in practical software development workflows.
-
Integration with Other Code Understanding Tasks: The paper focuses on code comment generation and classification, but the NeSy-based approach could potentially be extended to other code understanding tasks, such as code summarization, code retrieval, or code refactoring. Exploring these broader applications could further demonstrate the versatility and impact of the proposed NeSy-based approach.
Overall, the paper presents a promising direction for advancing code understanding and generation by leveraging the strengths of LLMs and symbolic techniques. Addressing the identified limitations and exploring the broader applicability of the NeSy-based approach could lead to significant advancements in the field of code intelligence.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel NeSy-based approach to code comment generation and classification that outperforms traditional techniques. By combining the strengths of Large Language Models and symbolic reasoning, the researchers demonstrate how this hybrid approach can generate more accurate and informative code comments, as well as better classify the intent behind these comments.
The paper's findings highlight the potential of NeSy AI to bridge the gap between the text generation capabilities of LLMs and the precision of symbolic techniques in the context of code understanding. This has important implications for improving code readability, maintainability, and the overall efficiency of software development workflows.
While the paper presents a promising direction, further research is needed to address scalability, generalization, and the integration of the NeSy-based approach with other code understanding tasks. Nonetheless, this work represents a significant step forward in leveraging the complementary strengths of LLMs and symbolic reasoning to advance the field of code intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
Specify What? Enhancing Neural Specification Synthesis by Symbolic Methods
George Granberry, Wolfgang Ahrendt, Moa Johansson
0
0
We investigate how combinations of Large Language Models (LLMs) and symbolic analyses can be used to synthesise specifications of C programs. The LLM prompts are augmented with outputs from two formal methods tools in the Frama-C ecosystem, Pathcrawler and EVA, to produce C program annotations in the specification language ACSL. We demonstrate how the addition of symbolic analysis to the workflow impacts the quality of annotations: information about input/output examples from Pathcrawler produce more context-aware annotations, while the inclusion of EVA reports yields annotations more attuned to runtime errors. In addition, we show that the method infers rather the programs intent than its behaviour, by generating specifications for buggy programs and observing robustness of the result against bugs.
6/26/2024
SymbolicAI: A framework for logic-based approaches combining generative models and solvers
Marius-Constantin Dinu, Claudiu Leoveanu-Condrei, Markus Holzleitner, Werner Zellinger, Sepp Hochreiter
0
0
We introduce SymbolicAI, a versatile and modular framework employing a logic-based approach to concept learning and flow management in generative processes. SymbolicAI enables the seamless integration of generative models with a diverse range of solvers by treating large language models (LLMs) as semantic parsers that execute tasks based on both natural and formal language instructions, thus bridging the gap between symbolic reasoning and generative AI. We leverage probabilistic programming principles to tackle complex tasks, and utilize differentiable and classical programming paradigms with their respective strengths. The framework introduces a set of polymorphic, compositional, and self-referential operations for multi-modal data that connects multi-step generative processes and aligns their outputs with user objectives in complex workflows. As a result, we can transition between the capabilities of various foundation models with in-context learning capabilities and specialized, fine-tuned models or solvers proficient in addressing specific problems. Through these operations based on in-context learning our framework enables the creation and evaluation of explainable computational graphs. Finally, we introduce a quality measure and its empirical score for evaluating these computational graphs, and propose a benchmark that compares various state-of-the-art LLMs across a set of complex workflows. We refer to the empirical score as the Vector Embedding for Relational Trajectory Evaluation through Cross-similarity, or VERTEX score for short. The framework codebase and benchmark are linked below.
5/28/2024
šø
Towards Verifiable Text Generation with Symbolic References
Lucas Torroba Hennigen, Shannon Shen, Aniruddha Nrusimha, Bernhard Gapp, David Sontag, Yoon Kim
0
0
LLMs are vulnerable to hallucinations, and thus their outputs generally require laborious human verification for high-stakes applications. To this end, we propose symbolically grounded generation (SymGen) as a simple approach for enabling easier manual validation of an LLM's output. SymGen prompts an LLM to interleave its regular output text with explicit symbolic references to fields present in some conditioning data (e.g., a table in JSON format). The references can be used to display the provenance of different spans of text in the generation, reducing the effort required for manual verification. Across a range of data-to-text and question-answering experiments, we find that LLMs are able to directly output text that makes use of accurate symbolic references while maintaining fluency and factuality. In a human study we further find that such annotations can streamline human verification of machine-generated text. Our code will be available at http://symgen.github.io.
4/16/2024
HYSYNTH: Context-Free LLM Approximation for Guiding Program Synthesis
Shraddha Barke, Emmanuel Anaya Gonzalez, Saketh Ram Kasibatla, Taylor Berg-Kirkpatrick, Nadia Polikarpova
0
0
Many structured prediction and reasoning tasks can be framed as program synthesis problems, where the goal is to generate a program in a domain-specific language (DSL) that transforms input data into the desired output. Unfortunately, purely neural approaches, such as large language models (LLMs), often fail to produce fully correct programs in unfamiliar DSLs, while purely symbolic methods based on combinatorial search scale poorly to complex problems. Motivated by these limitations, we introduce a hybrid approach, where LLM completions for a given task are used to learn a task-specific, context-free surrogate model, which is then used to guide program synthesis. We evaluate this hybrid approach on three domains, and show that it outperforms both unguided search and direct sampling from LLMs, as well as existing program synthesizers.
5/28/2024