Probabilistic Inference in Language Models via Twisted Sequential Monte Carlo
0
🤯
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- This paper explores techniques for improving the capabilities and safety of large language models (LLMs), including reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), automated red-teaming, prompt engineering, and infilling.
- The authors leverage the framework of sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) sampling to model these techniques as probabilistic inference problems, where the goal is to sample from an unnormalized target distribution defined by a reward or potential function.
- The paper introduces a novel approach called "twisted SMC" that uses learned "twist functions" to estimate the expected future value of the potential at each timestep, allowing the inference-time computation to focus on the most promising partial sequences.
- The authors also present a contrastive method for learning the twist functions and explore connections to the field of soft reinforcement learning.
- As a complementary application, the paper introduces techniques for evaluating the accuracy of language model inference methods using novel bidirectional SMC bounds on the log partition function.
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are powerful AI systems that can generate human-like text. However, ensuring the capabilities and safety of these models is a significant challenge. The authors of this paper explore several techniques to address this problem.
Towards Logically Consistent Language Models via Probabilistic is a method that trains LLMs to be more logically consistent by modeling the text generation process as a probabilistic inference problem. The authors in this paper build on this idea, using a statistical technique called sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) sampling to model various capability and safety techniques for LLMs.
The key idea is to think of these techniques, such as Supervised Knowledge Makes Large Language Models Better and Do LLMs Play Dice? Exploring Probability Distributions, as sampling from a target probability distribution that encodes the desired properties of the generated text. This distribution is defined by a "reward" or "potential" function, which the authors use to guide the SMC sampling process.
The authors introduce a novel twist on the SMC approach, using "twist functions" to estimate the expected future value of the potential at each step of the sampling process. This allows the computation to focus on the most promising partial sequences, making the overall process more efficient.
The authors also present a method for evaluating the accuracy of language model inference techniques, using Metric-Aware LLM Inference: Regression, Scoring and novel bidirectional SMC bounds on the log partition function. These bounds can be used to estimate the difference between the inference and target distributions, which is useful for assessing the performance of techniques like Distilled Self-Critique: LLMs, Synthetic Data, Bayesian.
Technical Explanation
The core idea of the paper is to cast various capability and safety techniques for large language models (LLMs) as probabilistic inference problems, where the goal is to sample from an unnormalized target distribution defined by a reward or potential function over the full sequence of generated text.
To achieve this, the authors leverage the framework of sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) sampling. SMC is a flexible approach for approximating probability distributions by iteratively constructing a set of weighted samples, or "particles," that converge to the target distribution.
The authors introduce a novel twist on the standard SMC approach, called "twisted SMC," which uses learned "twist functions" to estimate the expected future value of the potential at each timestep. This allows the inference-time computation to focus on the most promising partial sequences, making the overall process more efficient.
The twist functions are learned using a contrastive method that encourages the model to assign higher values to partial sequences that lead to higher-reward full sequences. This connection to soft reinforcement learning is explored in the paper.
As a complementary application, the authors present techniques for evaluating the accuracy of language model inference methods using novel bidirectional SMC bounds on the log partition function. These bounds can be used to estimate the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between the inference and target distributions in both directions, providing a more comprehensive assessment of the quality of the sampling process.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their twisted SMC framework on several tasks, including sampling undesirable outputs from a pretrained model (a useful component of harmlessness training and automated red-teaming), generating reviews with varied sentiment, and performing infilling tasks.
Critical Analysis
The paper presents a compelling approach for modeling various capability and safety techniques for large language models as probabilistic inference problems, leveraging the powerful framework of sequential Monte Carlo sampling. The introduction of twisted SMC, with its learned twist functions, is a novel and potentially impactful contribution that can improve the efficiency and effectiveness of these techniques.
One potential limitation of the approach is the reliance on a well-defined reward or potential function to guide the sampling process. In practice, defining such functions may be challenging, especially for more complex safety and value alignment objectives. The authors acknowledge this and suggest that future work could explore learning the twist functions in a more unsupervised or interactive manner.
Additionally, while the bidirectional SMC bounds provide a useful evaluation metric for language model inference techniques, the paper does not address the broader challenge of defining appropriate evaluation metrics and benchmarks for language model safety and value alignment. This is an important area for further research and discussion within the AI safety community.
Overall, the paper presents a novel and technically sophisticated approach to improving the capabilities and safety of large language models. The authors' contributions, particularly the twisted SMC framework and the inference evaluation techniques, represent valuable advancements in this active area of research. As the field of AI safety continues to evolve, the ideas and methods explored in this paper may serve as a foundation for further innovations and practical applications.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel framework for modeling various capability and safety techniques for large language models as probabilistic inference problems, leveraging the sequential Monte Carlo sampling approach. The key contributions include the twisted SMC method, which uses learned twist functions to focus inference-time computation on the most promising partial sequences, and novel bidirectional SMC bounds for evaluating the accuracy of language model inference techniques.
The authors demonstrate the effectiveness of their approach on several tasks, showcasing its potential for improving the capabilities and safety of large language models. While the paper highlights some limitations and areas for further research, the ideas and methods presented represent a significant advancement in the field of AI safety and value alignment. As the development of powerful language models continues, the techniques explored in this paper may play an important role in ensuring these systems are safe, reliable, and aligned with human values.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🤯
0
Probabilistic Inference in Language Models via Twisted Sequential Monte Carlo
Stephen Zhao, Rob Brekelmans, Alireza Makhzani, Roger Grosse
Numerous capability and safety techniques of Large Language Models (LLMs), including RLHF, automated red-teaming, prompt engineering, and infilling, can be cast as sampling from an unnormalized target distribution defined by a given reward or potential function over the full sequence. In this work, we leverage the rich toolkit of Sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) for these probabilistic inference problems. In particular, we use learned twist functions to estimate the expected future value of the potential at each timestep, which enables us to focus inference-time computation on promising partial sequences. We propose a novel contrastive method for learning the twist functions, and establish connections with the rich literature of soft reinforcement learning. As a complementary application of our twisted SMC framework, we present methods for evaluating the accuracy of language model inference techniques using novel bidirectional SMC bounds on the log partition function. These bounds can be used to estimate the KL divergence between the inference and target distributions in both directions. We apply our inference evaluation techniques to show that twisted SMC is effective for sampling undesirable outputs from a pretrained model (a useful component of harmlessness training and automated red-teaming), generating reviews with varied sentiment, and performing infilling tasks.
Read more4/29/2024
0
Imitating Language via Scalable Inverse Reinforcement Learning
Markus Wulfmeier, Michael Bloesch, Nino Vieillard, Arun Ahuja, Jorg Bornschein, Sandy Huang, Artem Sokolov, Matt Barnes, Guillaume Desjardins, Alex Bewley, Sarah Maria Elisabeth Bechtle, Jost Tobias Springenberg, Nikola Momchev, Olivier Bachem, Matthieu Geist, Martin Riedmiller
The majority of language model training builds on imitation learning. It covers pretraining, supervised fine-tuning, and affects the starting conditions for reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF). The simplicity and scalability of maximum likelihood estimation (MLE) for next token prediction led to its role as predominant paradigm. However, the broader field of imitation learning can more effectively utilize the sequential structure underlying autoregressive generation. We focus on investigating the inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) perspective to imitation, extracting rewards and directly optimizing sequences instead of individual token likelihoods and evaluate its benefits for fine-tuning large language models. We provide a new angle, reformulating inverse soft-Q-learning as a temporal difference regularized extension of MLE. This creates a principled connection between MLE and IRL and allows trading off added complexity with increased performance and diversity of generations in the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) setting. We find clear advantages for IRL-based imitation, in particular for retaining diversity while maximizing task performance, rendering IRL a strong alternative on fixed SFT datasets even without online data generation. Our analysis of IRL-extracted reward functions further indicates benefits for more robust reward functions via tighter integration of supervised and preference-based LLM post-training.
Read more9/4/2024
0
Large language model validity via enhanced conformal prediction methods
John J. Cherian, Isaac Gibbs, Emmanuel J. Cand`es
We develop new conformal inference methods for obtaining validity guarantees on the output of large language models (LLMs). Prior work in conformal language modeling identifies a subset of the text that satisfies a high-probability guarantee of correctness. These methods work by filtering claims from the LLM's original response if a scoring function evaluated on the claim fails to exceed a threshold calibrated via split conformal prediction. Existing methods in this area suffer from two deficiencies. First, the guarantee stated is not conditionally valid. The trustworthiness of the filtering step may vary based on the topic of the response. Second, because the scoring function is imperfect, the filtering step can remove many valuable and accurate claims. We address both of these challenges via two new conformal methods. First, we generalize the conditional conformal procedure of Gibbs et al. (2023) in order to adaptively issue weaker guarantees when they are required to preserve the utility of the output. Second, we show how to systematically improve the quality of the scoring function via a novel algorithm for differentiating through the conditional conformal procedure. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
Read more6/17/2024
0
Efficient Reinforcement Learning via Large Language Model-based Search
Siddhant Bhambri, Amrita Bhattacharjee, Huan Liu, Subbarao Kambhampati
Reinforcement Learning (RL) suffers from sample inefficiency in sparse reward domains, and the problem is pronounced if there are stochastic transitions. To improve the sample efficiency, reward shaping is a well-studied approach to introduce intrinsic rewards that can help the RL agent converge to an optimal policy faster. However, designing a useful reward shaping function specific to each problem is challenging, even for domain experts. They would either have to rely on task-specific domain knowledge or provide an expert demonstration independently for each task. Given, that Large Language Models (LLMs) have rapidly gained prominence across a magnitude of natural language tasks, we aim to answer the following question: Can we leverage LLMs to construct a reward shaping function that can boost the sample efficiency of an RL agent? In this work, we aim to leverage off-the-shelf LLMs to generate a guide policy by solving a simpler deterministic abstraction of the original problem that can then be used to construct the reward shaping function for the downstream RL agent. Given the ineffectiveness of directly prompting LLMs, we propose MEDIC: a framework that augments LLMs with a Model-based feEDback critIC, which verifies LLM-generated outputs, to generate a possibly sub-optimal but valid plan for the abstract problem. Our experiments across domains from the BabyAI environment suite show 1) the effectiveness of augmenting LLMs with MEDIC, 2) a significant improvement in the sample complexity of PPO and A2C-based RL agents when guided by our LLM-generated plan, and finally, 3) pave the direction for further explorations of how these models can be used to augment existing RL pipelines.
Read more5/27/2024