ROSE Doesn't Do That: Boosting the Safety of Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Reverse Prompt Contrastive Decoding
0
💬
Sign in to get full access
Overview
- Instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) have become more prominent, but ensuring their safety is critical
- Current approaches to align LLM outputs with safety expectations require substantial training efforts, which can be costly and inefficient
- This paper introduces "Reverse Prompt Contrastive Decoding (ROSE)," a simple yet effective method to directly boost the safety of existing instruction-tuned LLMs without additional training
Plain English Explanation
Large language models (LLMs) are AI systems that can generate human-like text. As these models become more advanced and widely used, it's important to make sure their outputs are safe and aligned with our expectations. However, the current ways of doing this often require a lot of time, effort, and resources to implement.
The researchers behind this paper have developed a new technique called "Reverse Prompt Contrastive Decoding (ROSE)" that can improve the safety of existing LLMs without needing to retrain them from scratch. The key idea is to use "reverse prompts" - carefully designed text inputs that encourage the model to produce safer outputs. By suppressing the model's tendency to generate undesirable content, ROSE can consistently and significantly boost the safety of LLMs across different tasks, while also maintaining or even improving their overall performance.
This is a valuable contribution because it provides a more efficient and cost-effective way to make LLMs safer, without having to start from scratch. It could help organizations and developers who are using these models in real-world applications to better manage risks and ensure their systems are behaving as intended.
Technical Explanation
The paper presents Reverse Prompt Contrastive Decoding (ROSE), a simple yet effective method to directly boost the safety of existing instruction-tuned LLMs without any additional training.
The key principle of ROSE is to improve the probability of desired safe output by suppressing the undesired output induced by carefully-designed "reverse prompts." These reverse prompts are text inputs that encourage the model to generate content that is misaligned with the expected safety criteria.
The researchers evaluated ROSE on 6 safety tasks and 2 general-purpose tasks, using 5 different types of instruction-tuned LLMs. The results show that ROSE consistently and significantly improves safety scores (up to +13.8%) compared to the baseline models, while also maintaining or even enhancing the models' general-purpose abilities.
The paper also includes in-depth analyses to explore the underlying mechanism of ROSE. These insights reveal when and where ROSE is most effective, providing guidance on how to apply the technique in practice.
Critical Analysis
The ROSE technique represents an interesting and potentially valuable approach to improving the safety of instruction-tuned LLMs. By leveraging reverse prompts to directly influence the model's output distribution, the method offers a more efficient alternative to the resource-intensive training approaches typically used for safety alignment.
However, the paper does acknowledge some limitations. For example, the effectiveness of ROSE may depend on the specific safety criteria being optimized for, and it may not be as effective at mitigating certain types of unsafe outputs, such as those driven by inherent model biases. Additionally, the researchers note that further investigation is needed to fully understand the generalization capabilities of the technique across different tasks and models.
It would also be worthwhile to explore how ROSE might interact with or complement other safety-focused techniques, such as the learning of diverse attacks or cross-task defense through instruction-tuning. Combining multiple approaches could potentially lead to more robust and comprehensive safety measures for LLMs.
Overall, the ROSE method represents a promising step forward in the ongoing efforts to ensure the safety and reliability of large language models. As the technology continues to advance, it will be crucial to develop a range of complementary techniques to address the various safety challenges that may arise.
Conclusion
This paper introduces a novel technique called Reverse Prompt Contrastive Decoding (ROSE) that can directly improve the safety of existing instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs) without requiring additional training. By leveraging carefully designed "reverse prompts" to suppress undesirable model outputs, ROSE consistently and significantly boosts safety scores across a range of tasks and LLM architectures.
The key advantage of ROSE is that it provides a more efficient and cost-effective approach to LLM safety alignment compared to traditional training-based methods. This could make it easier for organizations and developers to adopt and deploy these powerful AI models in real-world applications, while better managing the associated risks and ensuring the models behave as intended.
While ROSE has shown promising results, the paper also highlights areas for further research, such as understanding its limitations and exploring how it might be combined with other safety-focused techniques. As the field of LLM development continues to evolve, innovative solutions like ROSE will play an important role in shaping the future of safe and reliable artificial intelligence.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
💬
0
ROSE Doesn't Do That: Boosting the Safety of Instruction-Tuned Large Language Models with Reverse Prompt Contrastive Decoding
Qihuang Zhong, Liang Ding, Juhua Liu, Bo Du, Dacheng Tao
With the development of instruction-tuned large language models (LLMs), improving the safety of LLMs has become more critical. However, the current approaches for aligning the LLMs output with expected safety usually require substantial training efforts, e.g., high-quality safety data and expensive computational resources, which are costly and inefficient. To this end, we present reverse prompt contrastive decoding (ROSE), a simple-yet-effective method to directly boost the safety of existing instruction-tuned LLMs without any additional training. The principle of ROSE is to improve the probability of desired safe output via suppressing the undesired output induced by the carefully-designed reverse prompts. Experiments on 6 safety and 2 general-purpose tasks show that, our ROSE not only brings consistent and significant safety improvements (up to +13.8% safety score) upon 5 types of instruction-tuned LLMs, but also benefits the general-purpose ability of LLMs. In-depth analyses explore the underlying mechanism of ROSE, and reveal when and where to use it.
Read more6/18/2024
0
Adversarial Contrastive Decoding: Boosting Safety Alignment of Large Language Models via Opposite Prompt Optimization
Zhengyue Zhao, Xiaoyun Zhang, Kaidi Xu, Xing Hu, Rui Zhang, Zidong Du, Qi Guo, Yunji Chen
With the widespread application of Large Language Models (LLMs), it has become a significant concern to ensure their safety and prevent harmful responses. While current safe-alignment methods based on instruction fine-tuning and Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) can effectively reduce harmful responses from LLMs, they often require high-quality datasets and heavy computational overhead during model training. Another way to align language models is to modify the logit of tokens in model outputs without heavy training. Recent studies have shown that contrastive decoding can enhance the performance of language models by reducing the likelihood of confused tokens. However, these methods require the manual selection of contrastive models or instruction templates. To this end, we propose Adversarial Contrastive Decoding (ACD), an optimization-based framework to generate two opposite system prompts for prompt-based contrastive decoding. ACD only needs to apply a lightweight prompt tuning on a rather small anchor dataset (< 3 min for each model) without training the target model. Experiments conducted on extensive models and benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed method achieves much better safety performance than previous model training-free decoding methods without sacrificing its original generation ability.
Read more6/26/2024
0
Mitigating Exaggerated Safety in Large Language Models
Ruchira Ray, Ruchi Bhalani
As the popularity of Large Language Models (LLMs) grow, combining model safety with utility becomes increasingly important. The challenge is making sure that LLMs can recognize and decline dangerous prompts without sacrificing their ability to be helpful. The problem of exaggerated safety demonstrates how difficult this can be. To reduce excessive safety behaviours -- which was discovered to be 26.1% of safe prompts being misclassified as dangerous and refused -- we use a combination of XSTest dataset prompts as well as interactive, contextual, and few-shot prompting to examine the decision bounds of LLMs such as Llama2, Gemma Command R+, and Phi-3. We find that few-shot prompting works best for Llama2, interactive prompting works best Gemma, and contextual prompting works best for Command R+ and Phi-3. Using a combination of these prompting strategies, we are able to mitigate exaggerated safety behaviors by an overall 92.9% across all LLMs. Our work presents a multiple prompting strategies to jailbreak LLMs' decision-making processes, allowing them to navigate the tight line between refusing unsafe prompts and remaining helpful.
Read more8/30/2024
0
Refuse Whenever You Feel Unsafe: Improving Safety in LLMs via Decoupled Refusal Training
Youliang Yuan, Wenxiang Jiao, Wenxuan Wang, Jen-tse Huang, Jiahao Xu, Tian Liang, Pinjia He, Zhaopeng Tu
This study addresses a critical gap in safety tuning practices for Large Language Models (LLMs) by identifying and tackling a refusal position bias within safety tuning data, which compromises the models' ability to appropriately refuse generating unsafe content. We introduce a novel approach, Decoupled Refusal Training (DeRTa), designed to empower LLMs to refuse compliance to harmful prompts at any response position, significantly enhancing their safety capabilities. DeRTa incorporates two novel components: (1) Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) with Harmful Response Prefix, which trains models to recognize and avoid unsafe content by appending a segment of harmful response to the beginning of a safe response, and (2) Reinforced Transition Optimization (RTO), which equips models with the ability to transition from potential harm to safety refusal consistently throughout the harmful response sequence. Our empirical evaluation, conducted using LLaMA3 and Mistral model families across six attack scenarios, demonstrates that our method not only improves model safety without compromising performance but also surpasses well-known models such as GPT-4 in defending against attacks. Importantly, our approach successfully defends recent advanced attack methods (e.g., CodeAttack) that have jailbroken GPT-4 and LLaMA3-70B-Instruct. Our code and data can be found at https://github.com/RobustNLP/DeRTa.
Read more7/15/2024