SQBC: Active Learning using LLM-Generated Synthetic Data for Stance Detection in Online Political Discussions

Read original: arXiv:2404.08078 - Published 4/15/2024 by Stefan Sylvius Wagner, Maike Behrendt, Marc Ziegele, Stefan Harmeling
Total Score

0

SQBC: Active Learning using LLM-Generated Synthetic Data for Stance Detection in Online Political Discussions

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper proposes a novel active learning approach called SQBC (Synthetic Query-Based Calibration) that leverages large language models (LLMs) to generate synthetic data for stance detection in online political discussions.
  • The authors demonstrate that SQBC can achieve strong performance with limited labeled data by actively selecting informative samples for annotation, using LLM-generated synthetic data to calibrate the model, and fine-tuning on the combination of real and synthetic data.
  • The research explores the potential of synthetic data to enhance the robustness and performance of stance detection models, particularly in data-scarce scenarios.

Plain English Explanation

The researchers have developed a new way to train machine learning models for detecting the stance (or position) of people in online political discussions. Typically, training these models requires a lot of labeled data, which can be time-consuming and expensive to collect.

To address this, the researchers used large language models - powerful AI systems trained on vast amounts of text data - to generate synthetic (artificial) data that could be used to supplement the limited real-world labeled data. [This relates to the research in https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/distilled-self-critique-llms-synthetic-data-bayesian.]

The key idea is to use an "active learning" approach, where the model actively selects the most informative real-world examples to be labeled by humans. The model then uses a combination of the real labeled data and the synthetic data generated by the language model to fine-tune and improve its performance. [This approach builds on the ideas explored in https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/investigating-robustness-modelling-decisions-few-shot-cross.]

The researchers show that this SQBC approach can achieve strong performance on stance detection tasks, even with limited real-world labeled data. This is an important finding, as it suggests that synthetic data generated by large language models can be a powerful tool for enhancing the capabilities of AI systems, especially in domains where real-world data is scarce. [This relates to the research in https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/auditing-large-language-models-enhanced-text-based, https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/evaluating-generative-language-models-information-extraction-as, and https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/best-practices-lessons-learned-synthetic-data-language.]

Technical Explanation

The paper introduces a new active learning approach called SQBC (Synthetic Query-Based Calibration) for stance detection in online political discussions. The key components of SQBC are:

  1. Active Sample Selection: The model actively selects the most informative real-world examples from the unlabeled pool to be annotated by humans. This helps the model focus on the most valuable data points to improve its performance.

  2. Synthetic Data Generation: The researchers leverage large language models (LLMs) to generate synthetic data that can be used to supplement the limited real-world labeled data. The synthetic data is designed to cover a diverse range of perspectives and opinions.

  3. Model Fine-tuning: The model is fine-tuned on a combination of the real-world labeled data and the LLM-generated synthetic data. This helps the model learn more robust and generalizable representations, particularly in data-scarce scenarios.

The authors evaluate SQBC on several benchmark datasets for stance detection and show that it outperforms other active learning baselines, as well as models trained solely on real-world data or synthetic data. The results demonstrate the potential of using LLM-generated synthetic data to enhance the performance and robustness of stance detection models.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a well-designed and thorough evaluation of the SQBC approach, exploring its effectiveness across multiple datasets and providing insights into the role of synthetic data in enhancing stance detection models.

One potential limitation of the research is the reliance on the quality and diversity of the LLM-generated synthetic data. While the authors show that SQBC can effectively leverage this synthetic data, the performance of the approach may be sensitive to the capabilities of the underlying language model used for generation. [This relates to the research in https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/distilled-self-critique-llms-synthetic-data-bayesian.]

Additionally, the paper does not explore the potential biases or limitations of the LLM-generated synthetic data and how these may impact the final model performance. Further research is needed to understand the implications of using such synthetic data, especially in sensitive domains like political discussions. [This connects to the ideas explored in https://aimodels.fyi/papers/arxiv/investigating-robustness-modelling-decisions-few-shot-cross.]

Overall, the SQBC approach presents a promising direction for leveraging synthetic data to enhance stance detection models, particularly in data-scarce scenarios. However, continued research is needed to address the potential challenges and limitations of this approach, as well as to explore its broader applicability to other natural language processing tasks.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel active learning approach called SQBC that leverages LLM-generated synthetic data to improve stance detection in online political discussions. The key contribution of the research is demonstrating the potential of synthetic data to enhance the performance and robustness of NLP models, especially in data-scarce scenarios.

The SQBC approach combines active sample selection, synthetic data generation, and model fine-tuning to achieve strong results on benchmark stance detection tasks. This work highlights the value of exploring new ways to leverage large language models and synthetic data to address challenging problems in natural language processing.

As AI systems become increasingly capable, the responsible development and use of these technologies, including the careful consideration of biases and limitations, will be crucial. The insights from this research can inform future work on enhancing the robustness and reliability of NLP models, particularly in sensitive domains where data scarcity is a significant challenge.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

SQBC: Active Learning using LLM-Generated Synthetic Data for Stance Detection in Online Political Discussions
Total Score

0

SQBC: Active Learning using LLM-Generated Synthetic Data for Stance Detection in Online Political Discussions

Stefan Sylvius Wagner, Maike Behrendt, Marc Ziegele, Stefan Harmeling

Stance detection is an important task for many applications that analyse or support online political discussions. Common approaches include fine-tuning transformer based models. However, these models require a large amount of labelled data, which might not be available. In this work, we present two different ways to leverage LLM-generated synthetic data to train and improve stance detection agents for online political discussions: first, we show that augmenting a small fine-tuning dataset with synthetic data can improve the performance of the stance detection model. Second, we propose a new active learning method called SQBC based on the Query-by-Comittee approach. The key idea is to use LLM-generated synthetic data as an oracle to identify the most informative unlabelled samples, that are selected for manual labelling. Comprehensive experiments show that both ideas can improve the stance detection performance. Curiously, we observed that fine-tuning on actively selected samples can exceed the performance of using the full dataset.

Read more

4/15/2024

The Power of LLM-Generated Synthetic Data for Stance Detection in Online Political Discussions
Total Score

0

The Power of LLM-Generated Synthetic Data for Stance Detection in Online Political Discussions

Stefan Sylvius Wagner, Maike Behrendt, Marc Ziegele, Stefan Harmeling

Stance detection holds great potential for enhancing the quality of online political discussions, as it has shown to be useful for summarizing discussions, detecting misinformation, and evaluating opinion distributions. Usually, transformer-based models are used directly for stance detection, which require large amounts of data. However, the broad range of debate questions in online political discussion creates a variety of possible scenarios that the model is faced with and thus makes data acquisition for model training difficult. In this work, we show how to leverage LLM-generated synthetic data to train and improve stance detection agents for online political discussions:(i) We generate synthetic data for specific debate questions by prompting a Mistral-7B model and show that fine-tuning with the generated synthetic data can substantially improve the performance of stance detection. (ii) We examine the impact of combining synthetic data with the most informative samples from an unlabelled dataset. First, we use the synthetic data to select the most informative samples, second, we combine both these samples and the synthetic data for fine-tuning. This approach reduces labelling effort and consistently surpasses the performance of the baseline model that is trained with fully labeled data. Overall, we show in comprehensive experiments that LLM-generated data greatly improves stance detection performance for online political discussions.

Read more

6/19/2024

🔎

Total Score

0

Stance Detection on Social Media with Fine-Tuned Large Language Models

.Ilker Gul, R'emi Lebret, Karl Aberer

Stance detection, a key task in natural language processing, determines an author's viewpoint based on textual analysis. This study evaluates the evolution of stance detection methods, transitioning from early machine learning approaches to the groundbreaking BERT model, and eventually to modern Large Language Models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT, LLaMa-2, and Mistral-7B. While ChatGPT's closed-source nature and associated costs present challenges, the open-source models like LLaMa-2 and Mistral-7B offers an encouraging alternative. Initially, our research focused on fine-tuning ChatGPT, LLaMa-2, and Mistral-7B using several publicly available datasets. Subsequently, to provide a comprehensive comparison, we assess the performance of these models in zero-shot and few-shot learning scenarios. The results underscore the exceptional ability of LLMs in accurately detecting stance, with all tested models surpassing existing benchmarks. Notably, LLaMa-2 and Mistral-7B demonstrate remarkable efficiency and potential for stance detection, despite their smaller sizes compared to ChatGPT. This study emphasizes the potential of LLMs in stance detection and calls for more extensive research in this field.

Read more

4/19/2024

Advancing Annotation of Stance in Social Media Posts: A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models and Crowd Sourcing
Total Score

0

Advancing Annotation of Stance in Social Media Posts: A Comparative Analysis of Large Language Models and Crowd Sourcing

Mao Li, Frederick Conrad

In the rapidly evolving landscape of Natural Language Processing (NLP), the use of Large Language Models (LLMs) for automated text annotation in social media posts has garnered significant interest. Despite the impressive innovations in developing LLMs like ChatGPT, their efficacy, and accuracy as annotation tools are not well understood. In this paper, we analyze the performance of eight open-source and proprietary LLMs for annotating the stance expressed in social media posts, benchmarking their performance against human annotators' (i.e., crowd-sourced) judgments. Additionally, we investigate the conditions under which LLMs are likely to disagree with human judgment. A significant finding of our study is that the explicitness of text expressing a stance plays a critical role in how faithfully LLMs' stance judgments match humans'. We argue that LLMs perform well when human annotators do, and when LLMs fail, it often corresponds to situations in which human annotators struggle to reach an agreement. We conclude with recommendations for a comprehensive approach that combines the precision of human expertise with the scalability of LLM predictions. This study highlights the importance of improving the accuracy and comprehensiveness of automated stance detection, aiming to advance these technologies for more efficient and unbiased analysis of social media.

Read more

6/12/2024