Towards Efficient LLM Grounding for Embodied Multi-Agent Collaboration

Overview

• Grounding the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs) for embodied tasks is challenging due to the physical world's complexity.
• LLM planning for multi-agent collaboration requires communication or credit assignment to re-adjust proposed plans and achieve effective coordination.
• Existing methods that rely on physical verification or self-reflection suffer from excessive and inefficient querying of LLMs.

Plain English Explanation

Large language models (LLMs) are advanced AI systems that can understand and generate human-like text. However, using these models for real-world, physical tasks can be challenging. This is because the physical world is complex, and LLMs may struggle to reason about the details and logistics of a task.

One area where this is particularly evident is in multi-agent collaboration, where multiple LLMs need to work together to achieve a common goal. To do this effectively, the LLMs need to communicate with each other and adjust their plans based on feedback. However, current methods that rely on physically verifying the plans or having the LLMs reflect on their own performance can be inefficient and require a lot of back-and-forth.

Technical Explanation

In this paper, the researchers propose a novel framework called Reinforced Advantage feedback (ReAd) to address the challenges of grounding LLMs for multi-agent collaboration. The key idea is to use a "critic" model to learn a sequential advantage function from the data generated by the LLM planners. This advantage function can then be used to guide the LLM planners, helping them generate actions that are more likely to contribute to the final task success.

Theoretically, the researchers extend the advantage-weighted regression technique from reinforcement learning to the multi-agent setting, providing a formal analysis of how ReAd can improve the efficiency of LLM planning.

Experimentally, the researchers evaluate ReAd on two challenging tasks: Overcooked-AI and a variant of RoCoBench. The results show that ReAd outperforms baseline methods in terms of success rate and significantly reduces the number of interaction steps between agents and the number of queries to the LLMs, demonstrating its efficiency in grounding LLMs for real-world tasks.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a thoughtful approach to addressing the challenges of grounding LLMs for embodied, multi-agent tasks. By leveraging a critic model to provide feedback to the LLM planners, the researchers have found a way to improve the efficiency of the planning process without relying on excessive physical verification or self-reflection.

However, the paper does not fully address the limitations of this approach. For example, the researchers acknowledge that the critic model itself may be biased or imperfect, which could lead to suboptimal planning decisions. Additionally, the paper does not explore the scalability of ReAd to larger, more complex multi-agent scenarios.

Further research could investigate ways to make the critic model more robust and reliable, as well as explore how ReAd might perform in more diverse and challenging multi-agent environments. Grounding the reasoning ability of large language models (LLMs) for embodied tasks is challenging due to the complexity of the physical world, and the ReAd framework represents an important step towards effective large language model adaptation and improved grounding.

Conclusion

This paper presents a novel framework called Reinforced Advantage feedback (ReAd) that aims to improve the efficiency of grounding large language models (LLMs) for multi-agent collaboration tasks. By leveraging a critic model to provide feedback to the LLM planners, ReAd helps the LLMs generate actions that are more likely to contribute to the final task success, reducing the need for excessive physical verification or self-reflection.

The researchers' theoretical analysis and experimental results demonstrate the potential of ReAd to ground language plans and demonstrations through counterfactual perturbations and improve LLM coordination and multi-agent collaboration. While the approach has some limitations, it represents an important step towards better confidence calibration and rationalization of LLMs via multi-agent techniques, which could have far-reaching implications for the field of embodied AI.