Imprecise Probabilities Meet Partial Observability: Game Semantics for Robust POMDPs
2405.04941
0
0
🤯
Abstract
Partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) rely on the key assumption that probability distributions are precisely known. Robust POMDPs (RPOMDPs) alleviate this concern by defining imprecise probabilities, referred to as uncertainty sets. While robust MDPs have been studied extensively, work on RPOMDPs is limited and primarily focuses on algorithmic solution methods. We expand the theoretical understanding of RPOMDPs by showing that 1) different assumptions on the uncertainty sets affect optimal policies and values; 2) RPOMDPs have a partially observable stochastic game (POSG) semantic; and 3) the same RPOMDP with different assumptions leads to semantically different POSGs and, thus, different policies and values. These novel semantics for RPOMDPS give access to results for the widely studied POSG model; concretely, we show the existence of a Nash equilibrium. Finally, we classify the existing RPOMDP literature using our semantics, clarifying under which uncertainty assumptions these existing works operate.
Create account to get full access
Overview
- Partially observable Markov decision processes (POMDPs) assume precise probability distributions, which is a strong requirement.
- Robust POMDPs (RPOMDPs) address this by defining imprecise probabilities, called uncertainty sets.
- While robust MDPs have been studied extensively, work on RPOMDPs is limited and focuses on algorithmic solutions.
- This paper expands the theoretical understanding of RPOMDPs.
Plain English Explanation
POMDPs are a type of decision-making framework used in various fields, like robotics and finance. They rely on the assumption that the probabilities of different outcomes are precisely known. However, in many real-world situations, this assumption may not hold. RPOMDPs alleviate this concern by allowing for imprecise probabilities, represented as uncertainty sets.
This paper delves deeper into the theoretical underpinnings of RPOMDPs. It shows that the assumptions made about these uncertainty sets can significantly impact the optimal policies and values. Additionally, it reveals that RPOMDPs have a connection to a broader class of decision-making problems called partially observable stochastic games (POSGs). Interestingly, the same RPOMDP with different assumptions can lead to semantically different POSGs, resulting in different policies and values.
These novel insights into the semantics of RPOMDPs provide a bridge to the well-studied POSG model, allowing the researchers to demonstrate the existence of a Nash equilibrium, a fundamental game-theoretic concept. This work also classifies the existing RPOMDP literature based on the underlying uncertainty assumptions, helping to clarify the different approaches and their implications.
Technical Explanation
The paper starts by highlighting the key assumption in POMDPs: the probability distributions are precisely known. Robust POMDPs (RPOMDPs) address this concern by allowing for imprecise probabilities, referred to as uncertainty sets. While robust MDPs have been extensively studied, research on RPOMDPs is limited and mainly focuses on algorithmic solution methods.
The paper makes three main contributions to the theoretical understanding of RPOMDPs:
- It shows that different assumptions on the uncertainty sets can affect the optimal policies and values.
- It demonstrates that RPOMDPs have a partially observable stochastic game (POSG) semantic.
- It reveals that the same RPOMDP with different assumptions can lead to semantically different POSGs, resulting in different policies and values.
These novel insights into the semantics of RPOMDPs provide a connection to the widely studied POSG model, allowing the researchers to show the existence of a Nash equilibrium. The paper also classifies the existing RPOMDP literature based on the underlying uncertainty assumptions, clarifying the different approaches and their implications.
Critical Analysis
The paper makes valuable contributions to the theoretical understanding of RPOMDPs, but it also acknowledges several limitations and areas for further research. The authors note that the analysis assumes specific structures for the uncertainty sets, and it would be interesting to explore the implications of relaxing these assumptions.
Additionally, the paper focuses on the theoretical aspects of RPOMDPs, and more empirical studies are needed to understand the practical implications of these findings. It would be beneficial to see how the different uncertainty assumptions and POSG semantics translate to real-world applications and decision-making scenarios.
Another potential area for further exploration is the computational complexity and scalability of RPOMDP solutions, as the POSG connection may introduce additional challenges in solving these problems efficiently.
Conclusion
This paper expands the theoretical understanding of Robust Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (RPOMDPs) by revealing novel insights into their semantics. It shows that the assumptions made about the uncertainty sets can significantly impact the optimal policies and values, and that RPOMDPs have a connection to the broader class of partially observable stochastic games (POSGs).
These findings provide a bridge to the well-studied POSG model, allowing the researchers to demonstrate the existence of a Nash equilibrium. The paper also classifies the existing RPOMDP literature based on the underlying uncertainty assumptions, helping to clarify the different approaches and their implications.
While the theoretical contributions are valuable, further empirical research is needed to understand the practical applications and implications of these insights. Exploring the computational complexity and scalability of RPOMDP solutions is another area that warrants further investigation.
This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!
Related Papers
🖼️
What should be observed for optimal reward in POMDPs?
Alyzia-Maria Konsta, Alberto Lluch Lafuente, Christoph Matheja
0
0
Partially observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs) are a standard model for agents making decisions in uncertain environments. Most work on POMDPs focuses on synthesizing strategies based on the available capabilities. However, system designers can often control an agent's observation capabilities, e.g. by placing or selecting sensors. This raises the question of how one should select an agent's sensors cost-effectively such that it achieves the desired goals. In this paper, we study the novel optimal observability problem OOP: Given a POMDP M, how should one change M's observation capabilities within a fixed budget such that its (minimal) expected reward remains below a given threshold? We show that the problem is undecidable in general and decidable when considering positional strategies only. We present two algorithms for a decidable fragment of the OOP: one based on optimal strategies of M's underlying Markov decision process and one based on parameter synthesis with SMT. We report promising results for variants of typical examples from the POMDP literature.
5/20/2024
👀
Recursively-Constrained Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes
Qi Heng Ho, Tyler Becker, Benjamin Kraske, Zakariya Laouar, Martin S. Feather, Federico Rossi, Morteza Lahijanian, Zachary N. Sunberg
0
0
Many sequential decision problems involve optimizing one objective function while imposing constraints on other objectives. Constrained Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (C-POMDP) model this case with transition uncertainty and partial observability. In this work, we first show that C-POMDPs violate the optimal substructure property over successive decision steps and thus may exhibit behaviors that are undesirable for some (e.g., safety critical) applications. Additionally, online re-planning in C-POMDPs is often ineffective due to the inconsistency resulting from this violation. To address these drawbacks, we introduce the Recursively-Constrained POMDP (RC-POMDP), which imposes additional history-dependent cost constraints on the C-POMDP. We show that, unlike C-POMDPs, RC-POMDPs always have deterministic optimal policies and that optimal policies obey Bellman's principle of optimality. We also present a point-based dynamic programming algorithm for RC-POMDPs. Evaluations on benchmark problems demonstrate the efficacy of our algorithm and show that policies for RC-POMDPs produce more desirable behaviors than policies for C-POMDPs.
6/6/2024
🏅
Provable Representation with Efficient Planning for Partial Observable Reinforcement Learning
Hongming Zhang, Tongzheng Ren, Chenjun Xiao, Dale Schuurmans, Bo Dai
0
0
In most real-world reinforcement learning applications, state information is only partially observable, which breaks the Markov decision process assumption and leads to inferior performance for algorithms that conflate observations with state. Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes (POMDPs), on the other hand, provide a general framework that allows for partial observability to be accounted for in learning, exploration and planning, but presents significant computational and statistical challenges. To address these difficulties, we develop a representation-based perspective that leads to a coherent framework and tractable algorithmic approach for practical reinforcement learning from partial observations. We provide a theoretical analysis for justifying the statistical efficiency of the proposed algorithm, and also empirically demonstrate the proposed algorithm can surpass state-of-the-art performance with partial observations across various benchmarks, advancing reliable reinforcement learning towards more practical applications.
6/12/2024
Measurement Simplification in rho-POMDP with Performance Guarantees
Tom Yotam, Vadim Indelman
0
0
Decision making under uncertainty is at the heart of any autonomous system acting with imperfect information. The cost of solving the decision making problem is exponential in the action and observation spaces, thus rendering it unfeasible for many online systems. This paper introduces a novel approach to efficient decision-making, by partitioning the high-dimensional observation space. Using the partitioned observation space, we formulate analytical bounds on the expected information-theoretic reward, for general belief distributions. These bounds are then used to plan efficiently while keeping performance guarantees. We show that the bounds are adaptive, computationally efficient, and that they converge to the original solution. We extend the partitioning paradigm and present a hierarchy of partitioned spaces that allows greater efficiency in planning. We then propose a specific variant of these bounds for Gaussian beliefs and show a theoretical performance improvement of at least a factor of 4. Finally, we compare our novel method to other state of the art algorithms in active SLAM scenarios, in simulation and in real experiments. In both cases we show a significant speed-up in planning with performance guarantees.
6/18/2024