Self-training Language Models for Arithmetic Reasoning

Read original: arXiv:2407.08400 - Published 7/12/2024 by Marek Kadlv{c}'ik, Michal v{S}tef'anik
Total Score

0

Self-training Language Models for Arithmetic Reasoning

Sign in to get full access

or

If you already have an account, we'll log you in

Overview

  • This paper explores the use of self-training to improve the arithmetic reasoning abilities of large language models.
  • The researchers developed a self-training approach where the model generates its own practice problems and solutions, then refines its skills through this self-generated training data.
  • The results demonstrate significant improvements in the model's ability to solve arithmetic problems, outperforming previous state-of-the-art approaches.

Plain English Explanation

The paper describes a way to make large language models better at solving math problems, specifically arithmetic problems like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division. The researchers found that these models can improve their math skills by generating their own practice problems and solutions, then using that self-generated data to further train and refine their abilities.

This self-training approach is effective because it allows the model to identify its own weaknesses and then specifically target those areas for improvement, rather than relying solely on a fixed dataset of problems. By dynamically creating new practice material, the model can continuously challenge itself and push the boundaries of its arithmetic reasoning capabilities.

The results show that this self-training method leads to significant gains in the model's ability to solve math problems accurately and efficiently, outperforming previous techniques that used more traditional training data and approaches. This is an important advance, as improving the mathematical reasoning skills of large language models has broad implications for their use in fields like scientific computing, financial modeling, and problem-solving.

Technical Explanation

The researchers developed a self-training approach to enhance the arithmetic reasoning capabilities of large language models. The key components of their method include:

  1. Problem Generation: The model is tasked with generating its own arithmetic problems, covering a range of difficulties and operations. This allows the model to identify areas where it needs more practice.

  2. Solution Generation: The model then attempts to solve the self-generated problems, producing the corresponding solutions. This step helps the model develop a deeper understanding of the underlying mathematical concepts.

  3. Self-Supervised Training: The model's generated problems and solutions are used as additional training data, allowing the model to refine its skills through this self-supervised learning process.

The researchers evaluated their approach on several benchmark datasets for arithmetic reasoning, comparing the performance of their self-trained model to previous state-of-the-art models. The results demonstrate significant improvements in the model's ability to accurately solve a variety of arithmetic problems, including those involving extrapolation beyond the training distribution.

Critical Analysis

The paper presents a compelling approach to improving the arithmetic reasoning capabilities of large language models. However, the researchers acknowledge several limitations and areas for further research:

  1. Scalability: While the self-training approach is effective, it can be computationally expensive, especially as the model's problem-generation and solution-generation capabilities become more sophisticated. Scalability to larger models and datasets remains a challenge.

  2. Generalization: The paper focuses on improving arithmetic reasoning, but it's unclear if the self-training approach would generalize equally well to other types of mathematical reasoning, such as symbolic integration or differential equations. Further research is needed to explore the broader applicability of this technique.

  3. Interpretability: As with many deep learning models, the inner workings of the self-trained model can be difficult to interpret. Understanding the specific mechanisms and representations that enable the improved arithmetic reasoning would be valuable for further advancing the field.

Despite these limitations, the paper represents an important step forward in enhancing the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models through self-supervised learning. The findings have the potential to impact a wide range of applications that rely on accurate and efficient problem-solving abilities.

Conclusion

This paper introduces a novel self-training approach to improve the arithmetic reasoning abilities of large language models. By leveraging the model's capacity to generate its own practice problems and solutions, the researchers were able to achieve significant performance gains on a variety of arithmetic benchmarks.

The findings have broad implications for the use of language models in fields that require strong mathematical reasoning, such as scientific computing, financial modeling, and problem-solving. While the approach has some limitations in terms of scalability and interpretability, it represents an important step forward in advancing the state of the art in this area.

As language models continue to play an increasingly central role in AI systems, developing robust mathematical reasoning capabilities will be crucial. The self-training technique described in this paper offers a promising path forward, and the researchers' insights are likely to spur further advancements in this critical area of AI research.



This summary was produced with help from an AI and may contain inaccuracies - check out the links to read the original source documents!

Follow @aimodelsfyi on 𝕏 →

Related Papers

Self-training Language Models for Arithmetic Reasoning
Total Score

0

Self-training Language Models for Arithmetic Reasoning

Marek Kadlv{c}'ik, Michal v{S}tef'anik

Language models achieve impressive results in tasks involving complex multistep reasoning, but scaling these capabilities further traditionally requires expensive collection of more annotated data. In this work, we explore the potential of improving the capabilities of language models without new data, merely using automated feedback to the validity of their predictions in arithmetic reasoning (self-training). We find that models can substantially improve in both single-round (offline) and online self-training. In the offline setting, supervised methods are able to deliver gains comparable to preference optimization, but in online self-training, preference optimization shows to largely outperform supervised training thanks to superior stability and robustness on unseen types of problems.

Read more

7/12/2024

SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models
Total Score

0

SIaM: Self-Improving Code-Assisted Mathematical Reasoning of Large Language Models

Dian Yu, Baolin Peng, Ye Tian, Linfeng Song, Haitao Mi, Dong Yu

There is a growing trend of teaching large language models (LLMs) to solve mathematical problems through coding. Existing studies primarily focus on prompting powerful, closed-source models to generate seed training data followed by in-domain data augmentation, equipping LLMs with considerable capabilities for code-aided mathematical reasoning. However, continually training these models on augmented data derived from a few datasets such as GSM8K may impair their generalization abilities and restrict their effectiveness to a narrow range of question types. Conversely, the potential of improving such LLMs by leveraging large-scale, expert-written, diverse math question-answer pairs remains unexplored. To utilize these resources and tackle unique challenges such as code response assessment, we propose a novel paradigm that uses a code-based critic model to guide steps including question-code data construction, quality control, and complementary evaluation. We also explore different alignment algorithms with self-generated instruction/preference data to foster continuous improvement. Experiments across both in-domain (up to +5.7%) and out-of-domain (+4.4%) benchmarks in English and Chinese demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed paradigm.

Read more

8/29/2024

Improving Language Model Reasoning with Self-motivated Learning
Total Score

0

Improving Language Model Reasoning with Self-motivated Learning

Yunlong Feng, Yang Xu, Libo Qin, Yasheng Wang, Wanxiang Che

Large-scale high-quality training data is important for improving the performance of models. After trained with data that has rationales (reasoning steps), models gain reasoning capability. However, the dataset with high-quality rationales is relatively scarce due to the high annotation cost. To address this issue, we propose textit{Self-motivated Learning} framework. The framework motivates the model itself to automatically generate rationales on existing datasets. Based on the inherent rank from correctness across multiple rationales, the model learns to generate better rationales, leading to higher reasoning capability. Specifically, we train a reward model with the rank to evaluate the quality of rationales, and improve the performance of reasoning through reinforcement learning. Experiment results of Llama2 7B on multiple reasoning datasets show that our method significantly improves the reasoning ability of models, even outperforming text-davinci-002 in some datasets.

Read more

5/1/2024

Physics of Language Models: Part 2.2, How to Learn From Mistakes on Grade-School Math Problems
Total Score

0

Physics of Language Models: Part 2.2, How to Learn From Mistakes on Grade-School Math Problems

Tian Ye, Zicheng Xu, Yuanzhi Li, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu

Language models have demonstrated remarkable performance in solving reasoning tasks; however, even the strongest models still occasionally make reasoning mistakes. Recently, there has been active research aimed at improving reasoning accuracy, particularly by using pretrained language models to self-correct their mistakes via multi-round prompting. In this paper, we follow this line of work but focus on understanding the usefulness of incorporating error-correction data directly into the pretraining stage. This data consists of erroneous solution steps immediately followed by their corrections. Using a synthetic math dataset, we show promising results: this type of pretrain data can help language models achieve higher reasoning accuracy directly (i.e., through simple auto-regression, without multi-round prompting) compared to pretraining on the same amount of error-free data. We also delve into many details, such as (1) how this approach differs from beam search, (2) how such data can be prepared, (3) whether masking is needed on the erroneous tokens, (4) the amount of error required, (5) whether such data can be deferred to the fine-tuning stage, and many others.

Read more

8/30/2024